• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有助于和阻碍最小化治疗负担和最大化患者能力的医疗保健服务提供的因素有哪些?一项针对中风健康专业人员观点的定性研究。

What helps and hinders the provision of healthcare that minimises treatment burden and maximises patient capacity? A qualitative study of stroke health professional perspectives.

机构信息

General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.

General Practice and Primary Care, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e034113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034113.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034113
PMID:32193265
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7150601/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Treatment burden is the healthcare workload experienced by individuals with long-term conditions and the impact on well-being. Excessive treatment burden can negatively affect quality-of-life and adherence to treatments. Patient capacity is the ability of an individual to manage their life and health problems and is dependent on a variety of physical, psychological and social factors. Previous work has suggested that stroke survivors experience considerable treatment burden and limitations on their capacity to manage their health. We aimed to examine the potential barriers and enablers to minimising treatment burden and maximising patient capacity faced by health professionals and managers providing care to those affected by stroke.

SETTING

Primary and secondary care stroke services in a single health board area in Scotland.

PARTICIPANTS

Face-to-face qualitative interviews with 21 participants including stroke consultants, nurses, physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech and language therapists, psychologists, general practitioners and health-service managers.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Data were analysed using thematic analysis to ascertain any factors that influence the provision of low-burden healthcare.

RESULTS

Barriers and facilitators to the provision of healthcare that minimises treatment burden and maximises patient capacity were reported under five themes: healthcare system structure (e.g. care coordination and autonomous working); resources (e.g. availability of ward nurses and community psychologists); knowledge and awareness (e.g. adequate time and materials for optimal information delivery); availability of social care (e.g. waiting times for home adaptations or extra social support) and patient complexity (e.g. multimorbidity).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings have important implications for the design and implementation of stroke care pathways, emphasising the importance of removing barriers to health professional provision of person-centred care. This work can inform the design of interventions aimed at nurturing autonomous working by health professionals, improving communication and care coordination or ensuring availability of a named person throughout the patient journey.

摘要

目的

治疗负担是患有慢性病的个体所经历的医疗工作量,以及对幸福感的影响。过多的治疗负担会对生活质量和治疗依从性产生负面影响。患者能力是个体管理生活和健康问题的能力,取决于各种身体、心理和社会因素。先前的研究表明,中风幸存者经历了相当大的治疗负担,并限制了他们管理健康的能力。我们旨在研究为受中风影响的患者提供护理的卫生专业人员和管理人员在减轻治疗负担和最大限度地提高患者能力方面面临的潜在障碍和促进因素。

地点

苏格兰单一卫生委员会区域内的初级和二级保健中风服务。

参与者

对 21 名参与者进行了面对面的定性访谈,包括中风顾问、护士、物理治疗师、职业治疗师、言语和语言治疗师、心理学家、全科医生和卫生服务经理。

结果测量

使用主题分析对数据进行分析,以确定影响提供低负担医疗保健的任何因素。

结果

报告了减轻治疗负担和最大限度地提高患者能力的医疗保健提供的障碍和促进因素,分为五个主题:医疗保健系统结构(例如,护理协调和自主工作);资源(例如,病房护士和社区心理学家的可用性);知识和意识(例如,充足的时间和材料以提供最佳信息);社会保健的可用性(例如,家庭改造或额外社会支持的等待时间)和患者的复杂性(例如,多种疾病)。

结论

我们的研究结果对中风护理途径的设计和实施具有重要意义,强调了消除卫生专业人员提供以患者为中心的护理的障碍的重要性。这项工作可以为旨在培养卫生专业人员自主工作、改善沟通和护理协调或确保患者整个治疗过程中都有指定人员的干预措施的设计提供信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a8d/7150601/a5ce8d94059f/bmjopen-2019-034113f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a8d/7150601/a5ce8d94059f/bmjopen-2019-034113f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a8d/7150601/a5ce8d94059f/bmjopen-2019-034113f01.jpg

相似文献

1
What helps and hinders the provision of healthcare that minimises treatment burden and maximises patient capacity? A qualitative study of stroke health professional perspectives.有助于和阻碍最小化治疗负担和最大化患者能力的医疗保健服务提供的因素有哪些?一项针对中风健康专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e034113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034113.
2
A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke.中风治疗负担与患者能力的概念模型。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 9;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0691-4.
3
How has the impact of 'care pathway technologies' on service integration in stroke care been measured and what is the strength of the evidence to support their effectiveness in this respect?“护理路径技术”对卒中护理服务整合的影响是如何衡量的,以及有哪些证据支持其在这方面的有效性?
Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2008 Mar;6(1):78-110. doi: 10.1111/j.1744-1609.2007.00098.x.
4
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
5
A qualitative case study in the social capital of co-professional collaborative co-practice for children with speech, language and communication needs.一项关于有言语、语言和沟通需求儿童的跨专业协作共同实践社会资本的定性案例研究。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2017 Jul;52(4):514-527. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12296. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
6
Healthcare professionals' perspective on treatment burden and patient capacity in low-income rural populations: challenges and opportunities.医疗保健专业人员对低收入农村人口的治疗负担和患者能力的看法:挑战与机遇。
BMC Fam Pract. 2021 Mar 9;22(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s12875-021-01387-y.
7
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
8
Gaps in care for patients with memory deficits after stroke: views of healthcare providers.中风后记忆缺陷患者护理中的差距:医疗服务提供者的观点
BMC Health Serv Res. 2017 Sep 8;17(1):634. doi: 10.1186/s12913-017-2569-5.
9
Stroke education for healthcare professionals: making it fit for purpose.面向医疗保健专业人员的中风教育:使其符合目的。
Nurse Educ Today. 2008 Apr;28(3):337-47. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2007.06.008. Epub 2007 Sep 18.
10
Healthcare professionals' perspectives of the provision of, and challenges for, eating, drinking and psychological support post stroke: findings from semistructured interviews across India.医护人员对脑卒中后饮食、饮水和心理支持服务的看法,以及所面临的挑战:来自印度各地半结构化访谈的结果。
BMJ Open. 2023 Oct 25;13(10):e069150. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069150.

引用本文的文献

1
Implementing a new model of primary care for stroke survivors living in the community: a mixed-methods process evaluation.为社区中风幸存者实施新的初级保健模式:一项混合方法的过程评估。
Trials. 2025 Jul 19;26(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08957-w.
2
A systematic review of the use of burden of treatment theory.治疗负担理论应用的系统评价
J Multimorb Comorb. 2025 May 9;15:26335565251314828. doi: 10.1177/26335565251314828. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Looking beyond the eyes of the patient: The importance of effective communication in the treatment of age-related macular degeneration.

本文引用的文献

1
Development and validation of the Multimorbidity Treatment Burden Questionnaire (MTBQ).多重疾病治疗负担问卷(MTBQ)的开发与验证
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 12;8(4):e019413. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019413.
2
Stroke survivors' and informal caregivers' experiences of primary care and community healthcare services - A systematic review and meta-ethnography.中风幸存者及非正式照护者对初级保健和社区医疗服务的体验——一项系统评价与元民族志研究
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 21;13(2):e0192533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192533. eCollection 2018.
3
A conceptual model of treatment burden and patient capacity in stroke.
超越患者的视角:有效沟通在年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗中的重要性。
Acta Ophthalmol. 2025 Mar;103(2):205-214. doi: 10.1111/aos.16777. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
4
Technology Use for Home-Based Stroke Rehabilitation in Switzerland From the Perspectives of Persons Living With Stroke, Informal Caregivers, and Therapists: Qualitative Interview and Focus Group Study.从脑卒中患者、非正式照护者和治疗师的角度看瑞士家庭脑卒中康复的技术应用:定性访谈与焦点小组研究
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2024 Jul 18;11:e59781. doi: 10.2196/59781.
5
A scoping review of patient and public involvement in empirical stroke research.患者和公众参与实证性卒中研究的范围综述。
Int J Stroke. 2024 Oct;19(9):962-972. doi: 10.1177/17474930241262638. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
6
Treatment burden for patients with multimorbidity: cross-sectional study with exploration of a single-item measure.多病共存患者的治疗负担:一项探索单一指标测量方法的横断面研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2021 Apr 29;71(706):e381-e390. doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2020.0883. Print 2021 May.
7
Decreasing patient-reported burden of treatment: A systematic review of quantitative interventional studies.降低患者治疗负担:定量干预研究的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 12;16(1):e0245112. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245112. eCollection 2021.
8
Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model.临床实践中的微创医学(MDM):人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)临床护理模式的定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x.
9
Patients' and kidney care team's perspectives of treatment burden and capacity in older people with chronic kidney disease: a qualitative study.慢性肾脏病老年患者及肾脏护理团队对治疗负担和能力的看法:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2020 Dec 12;10(12):e042548. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042548.
10
Neurosurgeons and the fight with COVID-19: a position statement from the EANS Individual Membership Committee.神经外科医生与新冠疫情的抗争:欧洲神经外科协会个人会员委员会的立场声明
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Aug;162(8):1777-1782. doi: 10.1007/s00701-020-04360-3. Epub 2020 May 29.
中风治疗负担与患者能力的概念模型。
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Jan 9;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s12875-017-0691-4.
4
Development and validation of the Patient Experience with Treatment and Self-management (PETS): a patient-reported measure of treatment burden.治疗与自我管理患者体验量表(PETS)的开发与验证:一种患者报告的治疗负担测量方法
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):489-503. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1397-0. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
Experiences of Self-Management Support Following a Stroke: A Meta-Review of Qualitative Systematic Reviews.中风后自我管理支持的经验:定性系统评价的元综述
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 14;10(12):e0141803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141803. eCollection 2015.
6
Thinking about the burden of treatment.考虑治疗负担。
BMJ. 2014 Nov 10;349:g6680. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g6680.
7
Stroke, multimorbidity and polypharmacy in a nationally representative sample of 1,424,378 patients in Scotland: implications for treatment burden.苏格兰1424378名具有全国代表性患者样本中的中风、多种疾病并存及多重用药情况:对治疗负担的影响
BMC Med. 2014 Oct 3;12:151. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0151-0.
8
Adaptation and validation of the Treatment Burden Questionnaire (TBQ) in English using an internet platform.使用互联网平台对英文版本的治疗负担问卷(TBQ)进行改编与验证。
BMC Med. 2014 Jul 2;12:109. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-12-109.
9
Rethinking the patient: using Burden of Treatment Theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness.重新审视患者:运用治疗负担理论理解疾病动态的变化
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Jun 26;14:281. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-281.
10
Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research.揭示治疗负担作为卒中护理的关键概念:定性研究的系统评价。
PLoS Med. 2013;10(6):e1001473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001473. Epub 2013 Jun 25.