• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

临床实践中的微创医学(MDM):人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)临床护理模式的定性案例研究。

Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic Florida, 4500 San Pablo Rd S, Jacksonville, FL, USA.

Knowledge and Evaluation Research (KER) Unit, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x
PMID:33407451
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7788961/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests the need to reframe healthcare delivery for patients with chronic conditions, with emphasis on minimizing healthcare footprint/workload on patients, caregivers, clinicians and health systems through the proposed Minimally Disruptive Medicine (MDM) care model named. HIV care models have evolved to further focus on understanding barriers and facilitators to care delivery while improving patient-centered outcomes (e.g., disease progression, adherence, access, quality of life). It is hypothesized that these models may provide an example of MDM care model in clinic practice. Therefore, this study aimed to observe and ascertain MDM-concordant and discordant elements that may exist within a tertiary-setting HIV clinic care model for patients living with HIV or AIDS (PLWHA). We also aimed to identify lessons learned from this setting to inform improving the feasibility and usefulness of MDM care model.

METHODS

This qualitative case study occurred in multidisciplinary HIV comprehensive-care clinic within an urban tertiary-medical center. Participants included Adult PLWHA and informal caregivers (e.g. family/friends) attending the clinic for regular appointments were recruited. All clinic staff were eligible for recruitment. Measurements included; semi-guided interviews with patients, caregivers, or both; semi-guided interviews with varied clinicians (individually); and direct observations of clinical encounters (patient-clinicians), as well as staff daily operations in 2015-2017. The qualitative-data synthesis used iterative, mainly inductive thematic coding.

RESULTS

Researcher interviews and observations data included 28 patients, 5 caregivers, and 14 care-team members. With few exceptions, the clinic care model elements aligned closely to the MDM model of care through supporting patient capacity/abilities (with some patients receiving minimal social support and limited assistance with reframing their biography) and minimizing workload/demands (with some patients challenged by the clinic hours of operation).

CONCLUSIONS

The studied HIV clinic incorporated many of the MDM tenants, contributing to its validation, and informing gaps in knowledge. While these findings may support the design and implementation of care that is both minimally disruptive and maximally supportive, the impact of MDM on patient-important outcomes and different care settings require further studying.

摘要

背景

最近的证据表明,需要重新构建慢性病患者的医疗服务模式,强调通过拟议的最小化医疗干扰(MDM)护理模式,最大限度地减少医疗足迹/工作量对患者、护理人员、临床医生和医疗系统的影响。该模式命名为最小化医疗干扰(MDM)护理模式。艾滋病毒护理模式已经发展到进一步关注理解护理提供的障碍和促进因素,同时改善以患者为中心的结果(例如,疾病进展、依从性、获得、生活质量)。假设这些模型可能为临床实践中的 MDM 护理模式提供范例。因此,本研究旨在观察和确定在为艾滋病毒/艾滋病(PLWHA)患者提供的三级设置艾滋病毒诊所护理模式中可能存在的 MDM 一致和不一致的因素。我们还旨在从该环境中吸取经验教训,为改善 MDM 护理模式的可行性和实用性提供信息。

方法

本定性案例研究发生在城市三级医疗中心的多学科艾滋病毒综合护理诊所内。参与者包括定期就诊的成年 PLWHA 和非正规护理人员(例如,家庭/朋友)。所有临床医生都有资格参加招聘。测量包括:对患者、护理人员或两者进行半引导访谈;对不同临床医生(单独)进行半引导访谈;以及对临床医生与患者的临床接触(患者-临床医生)以及 2015-2017 年期间工作人员的日常运营进行直接观察。使用迭代的、主要是归纳主题编码进行定性数据综合。

结果

研究人员的访谈和观察数据包括 28 名患者、5 名护理人员和 14 名护理团队成员。除了少数例外,诊所护理模式元素与 MDM 护理模式非常吻合,通过支持患者能力(一些患者接受的社会支持很少,在重新构建他们的传记方面的帮助有限)和最小化工作量/需求(一些患者面临诊所的运营时间挑战)。

结论

研究中的艾滋病毒诊所采用了许多 MDM 租户,这验证了该模式,并为知识空白提供了信息。虽然这些发现可能支持设计和实施最小化干扰和最大程度支持的护理,但 MDM 对患者重要结果和不同护理环境的影响需要进一步研究。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/cd5ac9ad96fa/12913_2020_6010_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/6ee175eb3b48/12913_2020_6010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/d931035d780f/12913_2020_6010_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/e46740603bf8/12913_2020_6010_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/cd5ac9ad96fa/12913_2020_6010_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/6ee175eb3b48/12913_2020_6010_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/d931035d780f/12913_2020_6010_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/e46740603bf8/12913_2020_6010_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4c85/7788961/cd5ac9ad96fa/12913_2020_6010_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally disruptive medicine (MDM) in clinical practice: a qualitative case study of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) clinic care model.临床实践中的微创医学(MDM):人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)临床护理模式的定性案例研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jan 6;21(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-06010-x.
2
Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.慢性病照护模式是否满足患有多种慢性病患者的新需求?一项系统综述与主题综合分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0190852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852. eCollection 2018.
3
Minimally disruptive medicine: the evidence and conceptual progress supporting a new era of healthcare.微创医学:支持医疗新时代的证据与概念进展
J R Coll Physicians Edinb. 2015;45(2):114-7. doi: 10.4997/JRCPE.2015.205.
4
[Implementation of a continuum of care for people living with HIV/AIDS in Hanoi (Vietnam)].[越南河内为艾滋病毒/艾滋病感染者提供连续护理的实施情况]
Sante. 2009 Jul-Sep;19(3):141-8. doi: 10.1684/san.2009.0169.
5
'There are no more secrets': acceptability of a family-centered model of care for HIV positive children in Eswatini.“不再有秘密”:在斯威士兰,艾滋病毒阳性儿童以家庭为中心的护理模式的可接受性。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Oct 15;20(1):951. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05810-5.
6
What helps and hinders the provision of healthcare that minimises treatment burden and maximises patient capacity? A qualitative study of stroke health professional perspectives.有助于和阻碍最小化治疗负担和最大化患者能力的医疗保健服务提供的因素有哪些?一项针对中风健康专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e034113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034113.
7
Improving Sexual and Gender Minority Cancer Care: Patient and Caregiver Perspectives From a Multi-Methods Pilot Study.改善性少数群体和性别少数群体的癌症护理:一项多方法试点研究中患者和护理人员的观点
Front Oncol. 2022 May 6;12:833195. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.833195. eCollection 2022.
8
Enablers of adherence to clinic appointments for children attending an antiretroviral clinic in Northern Nigeria: Perspectives of caregivers and care providers.促进尼日利亚北部一所艾滋病诊所就诊的儿童遵守预约的因素:照顾者和医护人员的观点。
J Trop Pediatr. 2019 Jun 1;65(3):273-279. doi: 10.1093/tropej/fmy047.
9
A qualitative study on the experiences and perspectives of public sector patients in Cape Town in managing the workload of demands of HIV and type 2 diabetes multimorbidity.开普敦公共部门患者在管理 HIV 和 2 型糖尿病共病的需求工作量方面的经验和观点的定性研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Mar 14;13(3):e0194191. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194191. eCollection 2018.
10
Experiences of HIV-infected adults and healthcare providers with healthcare delivery practices that influence engagement in US primary healthcare settings: a qualitative systematic review.美国初级医疗环境中,感染艾滋病毒的成年人及医疗服务提供者在影响参与度的医疗服务实践方面的经历:一项定性系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2019 Jun;17(6):1154-1228. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2017-003756.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review of the use of burden of treatment theory.治疗负担理论应用的系统评价
J Multimorb Comorb. 2025 May 9;15:26335565251314828. doi: 10.1177/26335565251314828. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
2
Determining Patient Panel Size in Primary Care: A Meta-Narrative Review.确定初级保健中的患者群体规模:一项元叙事综述
J Prim Care Community Health. 2025 Jan-Dec;16:21501319251321294. doi: 10.1177/21501319251321294.

本文引用的文献

1
Patient Work and Their Contexts: Scoping Review.患者工作及其背景:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Jun 2;22(6):e16656. doi: 10.2196/16656.
2
What helps and hinders the provision of healthcare that minimises treatment burden and maximises patient capacity? A qualitative study of stroke health professional perspectives.有助于和阻碍最小化治疗负担和最大化患者能力的医疗保健服务提供的因素有哪些?一项针对中风健康专业人员观点的定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 18;10(3):e034113. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034113.
3
Patient-centred and not disease-focused: a review of guidelines and multimorbidity.
以患者为中心而非以疾病为中心:对指南和多病共存的综述。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Nov;61(11):584-590. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019109. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
4
Not Until We Lose Our Sanity or Anymore Lives.直到我们失去理智或更多生命。 (原英文表述不太符合常规语法规范,翻译出来的中文也稍显生硬,但按照要求严格翻译)
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2019 May 27;3(2):248. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2019.02.004. eCollection 2019 Jun.
5
Safety work and risk management as burdens of treatment in primary care: insights from a focused ethnographic study of patients with multimorbidity.基层医疗中作为治疗负担的安全工作与风险管理:对患有多种疾病患者的聚焦人种志研究见解
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 8;19(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0844-0.
6
Sharing is Caring: Minimizing the Disruption with Palliative Care.分享即关怀:通过姑息治疗将干扰降至最低。
Cureus. 2018 Mar 13;10(3):e2321. doi: 10.7759/cureus.2321.
7
Minimally disruptive medicine for patients with complex multimorbidity.微创医学治疗复杂共病患者。
Aust J Gen Pract. 2018 Apr;47(4):175-179. doi: 10.31128/AFP-10-17-4374.
8
Does the chronic care model meet the emerging needs of people living with multimorbidity? A systematic review and thematic synthesis.慢性病照护模式是否满足患有多种慢性病患者的新需求?一项系统综述与主题综合分析。
PLoS One. 2018 Feb 8;13(2):e0190852. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0190852. eCollection 2018.
9
Development of a Conceptual Etiological Model of Treatment Regimen Fatigue Among Patients Engaged in HIV Care: A Qualitative Study.参与艾滋病护理的患者治疗方案疲劳概念性病因模型的构建:一项定性研究
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2017 Jul-Aug;28(4):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2017.02.008. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Meaningful conversations in living with and treating chronic conditions: development of the ICAN discussion aid.与慢性病共处及治疗过程中的有意义对话:ICAN讨论辅助工具的开发
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 23;16(1):514. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1742-6.