Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom
Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London WC1H 0AP, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):8196-8202. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1909011117. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
Our ability to recognize objects in peripheral vision is fundamentally limited by crowding, the deleterious effect of clutter that disrupts the recognition of features ranging from orientation and color to motion and depth. Previous research is equivocal on whether this reflects a singular process that disrupts all features simultaneously or multiple processes that affect each independently. We examined crowding for motion and color, two features that allow a strong test of feature independence. "Cowhide" stimuli were presented 15° in peripheral vision, either in isolation or surrounded by flankers to give crowding. Observers reported either the target direction (clockwise/counterclockwise from upward) or its hue (blue/purple). We first established that both features show systematic crowded errors (biased predominantly toward the flanker identities) and selectivity for target-flanker similarity (with reduced crowding for dissimilar target/flanker elements). The multiplicity of crowding was then tested with observers identifying both features. Here, a singular object-selective mechanism predicts that when crowding is weak for one feature and strong for the other that crowding should be all-or-none for both. In contrast, when crowding was weak for color and strong for motion, errors were reduced for color but remained for motion, and vice versa with weak motion and strong color crowding. This double dissociation reveals that crowding disrupts certain combinations of visual features in a feature-specific manner, ruling out a singular object-selective mechanism. Thus, the ability to recognize one aspect of a cluttered scene, like color, offers no guarantees for the correct recognition of other aspects, like motion.
我们在周边视觉中识别物体的能力受到拥挤的限制,这种杂乱无章的效应会破坏从方向、颜色到运动和深度等特征的识别。之前的研究对于这种拥挤是否反映了一种同时破坏所有特征的单一过程,还是影响每个特征的多个过程,存在分歧。我们研究了运动和颜色的拥挤,这两个特征可以对特征独立性进行强有力的测试。“牛皮纸”刺激在周边视觉中以 15°的角度呈现,要么单独呈现,要么被侧翼包围以产生拥挤。观察者报告目标的方向(顺时针/逆时针从向上)或其色调(蓝色/紫色)。我们首先确定了这两个特征都显示出系统的拥挤错误(主要偏向于侧翼身份),并且对目标-侧翼相似性具有选择性(相似的目标-侧翼元素的拥挤减少)。然后,通过观察者识别两个特征来测试拥挤的多重性。在这里,单一的物体选择性机制预测,当一个特征的拥挤较弱而另一个特征的拥挤较强时,两者都应该是全有或全无的。相反,当颜色的拥挤较弱而运动的拥挤较强时,颜色的错误减少,但运动的错误仍然存在,反之亦然,当运动的拥挤较弱而颜色的拥挤较强时。这种双重分离表明,拥挤以特定于特征的方式破坏了某些视觉特征的组合,排除了单一的物体选择性机制。因此,识别杂乱场景中某一方面(如颜色)的能力并不能保证正确识别其他方面(如运动)。