Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
NIHR Biomedical Research Centre @ Moorfields Eye Hospital, London, UK.
J Vis. 2022 May 3;22(6):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.22.6.3.
Visual crowding is the disruptive effect of clutter on object recognition. Although most prominent in adult peripheral vision, crowding also disrupts foveal vision in typically developing children and those with strabismic amblyopia. Do these crowding effects share the same mechanism? Here we exploit observations that crowded errors in peripheral vision are not random: Target objects appear either averaged with the flankers (assimilation) or replaced by them (substitution). If amblyopic and developmental crowding share the same mechanism, then their errors should be similarly systematic. We tested foveal vision in children aged 3 to 8 years with typical vision or strabismic amblyopia and peripheral vision in typical adults. The perceptual effects of crowding were measured by requiring observers to adjust a reference stimulus to match the perceived orientation of a target "Vac-Man" element. When the target was surrounded by flankers that differed by ± 30°, all three groups (adults and children with typical or amblyopic vision) reported orientations between the target and flankers (assimilation). Errors were reduced with ± 90° differences but primarily matched the flanker orientation (substitution) when they did occur. A population pooling model of crowding successfully simulated this pattern of errors in all three groups. We conclude that the perceptual effects of amblyopic and developing crowding are systematic and resemble the near periphery in adults, suggesting a common underlying mechanism.
视觉拥挤是指杂乱对物体识别的干扰效应。尽管在成人周边视野中最为明显,但拥挤也会干扰正常发育的儿童和斜视性弱视儿童的中心凹视力。这些拥挤效应是否具有相同的机制?在这里,我们利用了这样一个观察结果,即周边视野中的拥挤错误不是随机的:目标物体要么与侧翼平均(同化),要么被它们取代(替代)。如果弱视和发育性拥挤具有相同的机制,那么它们的错误应该是类似的系统。我们测试了年龄在 3 至 8 岁的具有正常视力或斜视性弱视的儿童以及具有正常视力的成年人的中心凹视力。通过要求观察者调整参考刺激以匹配目标“Vac-Man”元素的感知方向,来测量拥挤的感知效应。当目标被±30°差异的侧翼包围时,所有三组(具有正常或弱视视力的成年人和儿童)都报告了目标和侧翼之间的方向(同化)。当存在±90°差异时,误差会减小,但主要与侧翼方向匹配(替代)。拥挤的群体池模型成功地模拟了所有三组的这种错误模式。我们得出结论,弱视和发育性拥挤的感知效应是系统的,类似于成人的近周边,表明存在共同的潜在机制。