Patel Pritesh R, Senyuk Vitalyi, Sweiss Karen, Calip Greg S, Pan Dipanjan, Rodriguez Natalie, Oh Annie, Mahmud Nadim, Rondelli Damiano
Division of Hematology/ Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Division of Hematology/ Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2020 Jul;26(7):1273-1279. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2020.03.008. Epub 2020 Mar 17.
High-dose melphalan (MEL) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is the standard of care in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Resistance to MEL has been linked to increased DNA repair. Here we sought to identify whether inhibition of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) synergizes with MEL and can overcome resistance. We tested the synergistic cytotoxicity of 3 inhibitors of PARP (PARPi)-veliparib (VEL), olaparib (OLA), and niraparib (NIRA)-combined with MEL in RPMI8226 and U266 MM cell lines, as well as in their MEL resistance counterparts, RPMI8226-LR5 (LR5) and U266-LR6 (LR6). The addition of VEL, OLA, and NIRA to MEL reduced the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC) in RPMI8226 cells from 27.8 µM to 23.1 µM, 22.5 µM, and 18.0 µM, respectively. Similarly, the IC of MEL in U266 cells was decreased from 6.2 µM to 3.2 µM, 3.3 µM, and 3.0 µM, respectively. In LR5 and LR6 cells, PARPi did not reverse MEL resistance. We confirmed this in a NOD/SCID/gamma null xenograft mouse model with either MEL-sensitive (RPMI8226) or MEL-resistant (LR5) MM. Treatment with a MEL-VEL combination prolonged survival compared with MEL alone in RPMI8226 mice (107 days versus 67.5 days; P = .0009), but not in LR5 mice (41 versus 39 days; P = .09). We next tested whether 2 double-stranded DNA repair mechanisms, homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end-joining (NHEJ), cause MEL resistance in LR5 and LR6 cells. In an HR assay, LR6 cells had a 4.5-fold greater HR capability than parent U226 cells (P = .05); however, LR5 cells had an equivalent HR ability as parent RPMI8226 cells. We hypothesized that NHEJ may be a mediator of MEL resistance in LR5 cells. Given that DNA-PK is integral to NHEJ and may be a therapeutic target, we treated LR5 cells with the DNA-PK inhibitor NU7026 in combination with MEL. Although NU7026 alone at 2.5 µM had no cytotoxicity, in combination it completely reversed resistance to MEL (MEL IC, 46.4 µM versus 14.4 µM). We examined the clinical implications of our findings in a dataset of 414 patients treated with tandem ASCT. High PARP1 expressers had lower survival compared with patients with low expression (median 42.7 months versus median not reached; P = .003). We hypothesized that combined expression of the HR gene BRCA1, the NHEJ gene PRKDC (DNA-PK), and PARP1 may predict survival and found that overexpression of 0 (n = 101), 1 or 2 (n = 287), or all 3 (n = 26) genes had a negative impact on median survival (undefined versus 57.8 months versus 14.8 months; P < .0001). Here we demonstrate that PARPi synergized with MEL, but that resistance (which may be due to HR and NHEJ pathways) is not completely reversed by PARPi. In addition, we observed that a 3-gene analysis may be tested to identify patients resistant or sensitive to high-dose MEL.
大剂量美法仑(MEL)和自体干细胞移植(ASCT)是治疗多发性骨髓瘤(MM)的标准治疗方法。对MEL的耐药性与DNA修复增加有关。在此,我们试图确定聚(ADP - 核糖)聚合酶(PARP)的抑制是否与MEL协同作用并能克服耐药性。我们测试了3种PARP抑制剂(PARPi)——维利帕尼(VEL)、奥拉帕尼(OLA)和尼拉帕尼(NIRA)——与MEL联合在RPMI8226和U266 MM细胞系及其MEL耐药对应细胞系RPMI8226 - LR5(LR5)和U266 - LR6(LR6)中的协同细胞毒性。在RPMI8226细胞中,将VEL、OLA和NIRA添加到MEL中可使半数最大抑制浓度(IC)分别从27.8 μM降至23.1 μM、22.5 μM和18.0 μM。同样,在U266细胞中,MEL的IC分别从6.2 μM降至3.2 μM、3.3 μM和3.0 μM。在LR5和LR6细胞中,PARPi并未逆转MEL耐药性。我们在NOD/SCID/γnull异种移植小鼠模型中用MEL敏感(RPMI8226)或MEL耐药(LR5)的MM证实了这一点。与单独使用MEL相比,MEL - VEL联合治疗延长了RPMI8226小鼠的生存期(107天对67.5天;P = 0.0009),但在LR5小鼠中未延长(41天对39天;P = 0.09)。接下来,我们测试了2种双链DNA修复机制,即同源重组(HR)和非同源末端连接(NHEJ),是否导致LR5和LR6细胞中的MEL耐药性。在一项HR检测中,LR6细胞的HR能力比亲代U226细胞高4.5倍(P = 0.05);然而,LR5细胞的HR能力与亲代RPMI8226细胞相当。我们推测NHEJ可能是LR5细胞中MEL耐药性的介导因素。鉴于DNA - PK是NHEJ所必需的且可能是一个治疗靶点,我们用DNA - PK抑制剂NU7026与MEL联合处理LR5细胞。尽管单独使用2.5 μM的NU7026没有细胞毒性,但联合使用时它完全逆转了对MEL的耐药性(MEL的IC,46.4 μM对14.4 μM)。我们在一个接受串联ASCT治疗的414例患者的数据集中研究了我们发现的临床意义。高PARP1表达者的生存期低于低表达患者(中位生存期42.7个月对未达到;P = 0.003)。我们推测HR基因BRCA1、NHEJ基因PRKDC(DNA - PK)和PARP1的联合表达可能预测生存期,并发现0个(n = 101)、1个或2个(n = 287)或所有3个(n = 26)基因的过表达对中位生存期有负面影响(未定义对57.8个月对14.8个月;P < 0.0001)。在此,我们证明PARPi与MEL协同作用,但PARPi不能完全逆转耐药性(这可能归因于HR和NHEJ途径)。此外,我们观察到可以进行一项三基因分析以识别对大剂量MEL耐药或敏感的患者。