• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于系统文献综述中主题筛选的聚类方法。

A clustering approach for topic filtering within systematic literature reviews.

作者信息

Weißer Tim, Saßmannshausen Till, Ohrndorf Dennis, Burggräf Peter, Wagner Johannes

机构信息

Chair for International Production Engineering and Management, University of Siegen.

出版信息

MethodsX. 2020 Feb 22;7:100831. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100831. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1016/j.mex.2020.100831
PMID:32195145
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7078380/
Abstract

Within a systematic literature review (SLR), researchers are confronted with vast amounts of articles from scientific databases, which have to be manually evaluated regarding their relevance for a certain field of observation. The evaluation and filtering phase of prevalent SLR methodologies is therefore time consuming and hardly expressible to the intended audience. The proposed method applies natural language processing (NLP) on article meta data and a k-means clustering algorithm to automatically convert large article corpora into a distribution of focal topics. This allows efficient filtering as well as objectifying the process through the discussion of the clustering results. Beyond that, it allows to quickly identify scientific communities and therefore provides an iterative perspective for the so far linear SLR methodology.•NLP and k-means clustering to filter large article corpora during systematic literature reviews.•Automated clustering allows filtering very efficiently as well as effectively compared to manual selection.•Presentation and discussion of the clustering results helps to objectify the nontransparent filtering step in systematic literature reviews.

摘要

在系统文献综述(SLR)中,研究人员面临着来自科学数据库的大量文章,必须人工评估这些文章与特定观察领域的相关性。因此,流行的SLR方法的评估和筛选阶段既耗时,又难以向目标受众说明。所提出的方法对文章元数据应用自然语言处理(NLP)和k均值聚类算法,以自动将大型文章语料库转换为焦点主题分布。这允许进行高效筛选,并通过对聚类结果的讨论使过程客观化。除此之外,它还能快速识别科学社群,从而为目前线性的SLR方法提供迭代视角。

  • NLP和k均值聚类用于在系统文献综述期间筛选大型文章语料库。

  • 与人工选择相比,自动聚类允许非常高效且有效地进行筛选。

  • 聚类结果的展示和讨论有助于使系统文献综述中不透明的筛选步骤客观化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/b3e87a335b73/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/1db8e5b79f0b/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/c781725e9d2f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/e8bf502cc89c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/d20503a0168d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/0ad6b7136fef/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/2e539abbee3c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/b3e87a335b73/gr6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/1db8e5b79f0b/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/c781725e9d2f/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/e8bf502cc89c/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/d20503a0168d/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/0ad6b7136fef/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/2e539abbee3c/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f253/7078380/b3e87a335b73/gr6.jpg

相似文献

1
A clustering approach for topic filtering within systematic literature reviews.一种用于系统文献综述中主题筛选的聚类方法。
MethodsX. 2020 Feb 22;7:100831. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.100831. eCollection 2020.
2
Automatically Detecting Failures in Natural Language Processing Tools for Online Community Text.自动检测在线社区文本自然语言处理工具中的故障。
J Med Internet Res. 2015 Aug 31;17(8):e212. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4612.
3
Machine learning in systematic reviews: Comparing automated text clustering with Lingo3G and human researcher categorization in a rapid review.系统评价中的机器学习:在快速综述中比较 Lingo3G 自动化文本聚类与人工研究者分类
Res Synth Methods. 2022 Mar;13(2):229-241. doi: 10.1002/jrsm.1541. Epub 2021 Dec 22.
4
Automatic extraction of quantitative data from ClinicalTrials.gov to conduct meta-analyses.从 ClinicalTrials.gov 自动提取定量数据进行荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Jan;105:92-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
5
An automated method for developing search strategies for systematic review using Natural Language Processing (NLP).一种使用自然语言处理(NLP)为系统评价制定检索策略的自动化方法。
MethodsX. 2022 Nov 23;10:101935. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2022.101935. eCollection 2023.
6
Novel keyword co-occurrence network-based methods to foster systematic reviews of scientific literature.基于新型关键词共现网络的方法促进科学文献的系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Mar 22;12(3):e0172778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0172778. eCollection 2017.
7
A Super-Clustering Approach for Fully Automated Single Particle Picking in Cryo-EM.一种用于冷冻电镜中全自动单颗粒挑选的超级聚类方法。
Genes (Basel). 2019 Aug 30;10(9):666. doi: 10.3390/genes10090666.
8
9
Increased workload for systematic review literature searches of diagnostic tests compared with treatments: challenges and opportunities.与治疗相比,诊断测试系统评价文献检索的工作量增加:挑战与机遇。
JMIR Med Inform. 2014 May 27;2(1):e11. doi: 10.2196/medinform.3037.
10
Scoping Reviews, Systematic Reviews, and Meta-Analysis: Applications in Veterinary Medicine.综述、系统评价和荟萃分析:在兽医学中的应用
Front Vet Sci. 2020 Jan 28;7:11. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2020.00011. eCollection 2020.

引用本文的文献

1
AI-pocalypse now: Automating the systematic literature review with SPARK (Systematic processing and automated review Kit) - gathering, organising, filtering, and scaffolding.当下的人工智能大灾难:使用SPARK(系统处理与自动综述工具包)实现系统文献综述的自动化——收集、整理、筛选及搭建框架。
MethodsX. 2024 Dec 21;14:103129. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2024.103129. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Automation of systematic reviews of biomedical literature: a scoping review of studies indexed in PubMed.生物医学文献系统评价自动化:PubMed 索引研究的范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jul 8;13(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02592-3.
3
A method of Mapping Process for scientific production using the Smart Bibliometrics.

本文引用的文献

1
Clustering algorithms: A comparative approach.聚类算法:一种比较方法。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 15;14(1):e0210236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210236. eCollection 2019.
2
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135. Epub 2009 Jul 20.
3
"Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.“满是星光”:迈向文献检索报告标准
一种使用智能文献计量学的科学产出映射过程方法。
MethodsX. 2023 Sep 6;11:102367. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2023.102367. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Lessons Learned from a Two-Round Delphi-based Scenario Study.基于两轮德尔菲法的情景研究的经验教训
MethodsX. 2020 Dec 13;8:101179. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2020.101179. eCollection 2021.
J Med Libr Assoc. 2006 Oct;94(4):421-9, e205.