Center for Behavioral Health Research and Services, University of Alaska Anchorage, Anchorage, AK, United States.
Kaiser Permanente Colorado, Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO, United States.
Front Public Health. 2020 Mar 3;8:59. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00059. eCollection 2020.
RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) and CFIR (Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research) dissemination and implementation frameworks define theory-based domains associated with the adoption, implementation and maintenance of evidence-based interventions. Used together, the two frameworks identify metrics for evaluating implementation success, i.e., high reach and effectiveness resulting in sustained practice change (RE-AIM), and modifiable factors that explain and enhance implementation outcomes (CFIR). We applied both frameworks to study the implementation planning process for a technology-delivered asthma care intervention called Breathewell within an integrated care organization. The goal of the Breathewell intervention is to increase the efficiency of delivering resource-intensive asthma care services. We reviewed historical documents (i.e., meeting agendas; minutes) from 14 months of planning to evaluate alignment of implementation team priorities with RE-AIM domains. Key content was extracted and analyzed on topics, frequency and amount of discussion within each RE-AIM domain. Implementation team members were interviewed using questions adapted from the to focus their reflection on the process and contextual factors considered during pre-implementation planning. Documents and transcripts were initially coded using RE-AIM domain definitions, and recoded using CFIR constructs, with intent to help explain how team decisions and actions can contribute to adoption, implementation and maintenance outcomes. Qualitative analysis of team documents and interviews demonstrated strong alignment with the RE-AIM domains: Reach, Effectiveness, and Implementation; and with the CFIR constructs: of provider and staff stakeholders in implementation planning, of the intervention with workflows and systems, and alignment of the intervention with organizational . Focus on these factors likely contributed to RE-AIM outcomes of high implementation fidelity. However, team members expressed low confidence that Breathewell would be adopted and maintained post-trial. A potential explanation was weak alignment with several CFIR constructs, including that contribute to organizational receptivity and motivation to sustain change. While RE-AIM provides a practical framework for planning and evaluating practice change interventions to assure their external validity, CFIR explains implementation succeeded or failed, and when used proactively, identifies relevant modifiable factors that can promote or undermine adoption, implementation, and maintenance.
RE-AIM(可及性、有效性、采用、实施、维持)和 CFIR(实施研究综合框架)传播和实施框架定义了与采用、实施和维持基于证据的干预措施相关的基于理论的领域。这两个框架一起确定了评估实施成功的指标,即高可及性和有效性导致持续的实践改变(RE-AIM),以及可解释和增强实施结果的可修改因素(CFIR)。我们将这两个框架应用于研究一个名为 Breathewell 的技术提供的哮喘护理干预措施在综合护理组织中的实施计划过程。Breathewell 干预措施的目标是提高提供资源密集型哮喘护理服务的效率。我们回顾了 14 个月的计划中的历史文件(即会议议程;会议记录),以评估实施团队的优先事项与 RE-AIM 领域的一致性。对每个 RE-AIM 领域的主题、讨论频率和讨论量进行了关键内容的提取和分析。使用改编自的问题对实施团队成员进行了访谈,以关注他们在实施前规划期间考虑的过程和背景因素的反思。文件和记录首先使用 RE-AIM 领域定义进行编码,然后使用 CFIR 结构进行重新编码,目的是帮助解释团队决策和行动如何有助于采用、实施和维持结果。团队文件和访谈的定性分析表明与 RE-AIM 领域具有很强的一致性:可及性、有效性和实施;以及与 CFIR 结构的一致性:提供者和员工利益相关者在实施计划中的、干预措施与工作流程和系统的、干预措施与组织的。关注这些因素可能有助于实现高实施保真度的 RE-AIM 结果。然而,团队成员表示对 Breathewell 在试验后是否会被采用和维持缺乏信心。一个潜在的解释是与几个 CFIR 结构的弱一致性,包括有助于组织接受度和维持变革动机的。虽然 RE-AIM 为规划和评估实践改变干预措施提供了一个实用的框架,以确保其外部有效性,但 CFIR 解释了实施成功或失败的原因,并且在积极使用时,可以确定相关的可修改因素,这些因素可以促进或破坏采用、实施和维持。