Dias Emanuelle M, Walker Timothy J, Balasubramanian Bijal A, Cuccaro Paula M, Workman Lauren, Wandersman Abraham, Fernandez Maria E
UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
UTHealth Houston Institute for Implementation Science, UTHealth Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA.
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Dec 26;9(1):e26. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.689. eCollection 2025.
Evidence-based interventions (EBIs) exist to increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, but implementation remains slow in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs). Assessing organizational readiness can improve EBI implementation outcomes, but no studies have quantitatively examined the relation between organizational readiness subcomponents and implementation outcomes. This study examines associations between readiness subcomponents and CRC screening EBI implementation outcomes in FQHCs.
We used data from an ongoing parent study to develop an organizational readiness measure using the = MC heuristic. We conducted descriptive and cross-sectional analyses using FQHC clinic ( = 57) data across three states. A clinic contact completed a survey about clinic characteristics and then distributed an EBI-specific survey to clinic staff containing readiness and implementation questions about EBIs (e.g., patient reminders). Pearson correlations assessed bivariate associations between readiness variables and implementation outcomes. We then computed multivariable linear associations between readiness variables and implementation outcomes while controlling for clinic-level variables. One-way analysis of variance tested group differences in readiness subcomponent mean scores using EBI implementation responses.
Respondents' most common job type was medical assistant, and the most frequently implemented EBIs were provider or patient reminders. Organizational structure was associated with implementing patient reminders. Clinics reporting inconsistent implementation had lower organizational structure scores than clinics planning or fully implementing patient reminders.
This study guides researchers in prioritizing organizational structure and selecting specific implementation strategies to improve this construct to implement CRC screening-related EBIs. Future research should examine these associations using a larger sample size to explore additional relations between organizational readiness and implementation outcomes.
基于证据的干预措施(EBIs)旨在提高结直肠癌(CRC)筛查率,但在联邦合格健康中心(FQHCs)的实施速度仍然缓慢。评估组织准备情况可以改善EBI的实施效果,但尚无研究对组织准备情况的子成分与实施效果之间的关系进行定量研究。本研究考察了FQHCs中准备情况子成分与CRC筛查EBI实施效果之间的关联。
我们使用一项正在进行的母研究的数据,采用=MC启发法制定了一项组织准备情况测量方法。我们使用来自三个州的FQHC诊所(=57)的数据进行了描述性和横断面分析。诊所联系人完成了一份关于诊所特征的调查问卷,然后向诊所工作人员分发了一份针对EBI的调查问卷,其中包含有关EBIs(如患者提醒)的准备情况和实施问题。Pearson相关性分析评估了准备情况变量与实施效果之间的双变量关联。然后,我们在控制诊所层面变量的同时,计算了准备情况变量与实施效果之间的多变量线性关联。单向方差分析使用EBI实施反应测试了准备情况子成分平均得分的组间差异。
受访者最常见的工作类型是医疗助理,最常实施的EBIs是提供者或患者提醒。组织结构与实施患者提醒有关。报告实施不一致的诊所的组织结构得分低于计划或完全实施患者提醒的诊所。
本研究指导研究人员在优先考虑组织结构和选择特定实施策略以改善这一结构方面,从而实施与CRC筛查相关的EBIs。未来的研究应该使用更大的样本量来检验这些关联,以探索组织准备情况与实施效果之间的其他关系。