Houbois Christian, Haneder Stefan, Merkt Martin, Holz Jasmin A, Morelli John, Kiel Alexandra, Doerner Jonas, Maintz David, Puesken Michael
From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
St. John's Medical Center, Tulsa, OK.
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2020 Mar/Apr;44(2):236-241. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000988.
The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of slice thickness, iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithm, and kernel selection on measurement accuracy and interobserver variability for semiautomated renal cortex volumetry (RCV) with multislice computed tomography (CT).
Ten patients (62.4 ± 17.2 years) undergoing abdominal biphasic multislice computed tomography were enrolled in this retrospective study. Computed tomography data sets were reconstructed at 1-, 2-, and 5-mm slice thickness with 2 different IR algorithms (iDose, IMRST) and 2 different kernels (IMRS and IMRR) (Philips, the Netherlands). Two readers independently performed semiautomated RCV for each reconstructed data set to calculate left kidney volume (LKV) and split renal function (SRF). Statistics were calculated using analysis of variance with Geisser-Greenhouse correction, followed by Tukey multiple comparisons post hoc test. Statistical significance was defined as P ≤ 0.05.
Semiautomated RCV of 120 data sets (240 kidneys) was successfully performed by both readers. Semiautomated RCV provides comparable results for LKV and SRF with 3 different slice thicknesses, 2 different IR algorithms, and 2 different kernels. Only the 1-mm slice thickness showed significant differences for LKV between IMRR and IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.28 bb) and IMRST versus IMRS (P = 0.02, mean difference = 4.68 cm) for reader 2. Interobserver variability was low between both readers irrespective of slice thickness and reconstruction algorithm (0.82 ≥ P ≥ 0.99).
Semiautomated RCV measurements of LKV and SRF are independent of slice thickness, IR algorithm, and kernel selection. These findings suggest that comparisons between studies using different slice thicknesses and reconstruction algorithms for RCV are valid.
本研究旨在评估层厚、迭代重建(IR)算法和核函数选择对多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)半自动肾皮质容积测定(RCV)测量准确性和观察者间变异性的影响。
本回顾性研究纳入了10例接受腹部双期多层螺旋CT检查的患者(62.4±17.2岁)。使用2种不同的IR算法(iDose、IMRST)和2种不同的核函数(IMRS和IMRR)(荷兰飞利浦公司)将计算机断层扫描数据集重建为1、2和5毫米的层厚。两名阅片者分别对每个重建数据集独立进行半自动RCV,以计算左肾体积(LKV)和分肾功能(SRF)。采用带Geisser-Greenhouse校正的方差分析进行统计计算,随后进行Tukey事后多重比较检验。统计学显著性定义为P≤0.05。
两名阅片者均成功完成了120个数据集(240个肾脏)的半自动RCV。半自动RCV在3种不同层厚、2种不同IR算法和2种不同核函数下对LKV和SRF的测量结果具有可比性。仅对于阅片者2,1毫米层厚在IMRR与IMRS之间的LKV显示出显著差异(P = 0.02,平均差异 = 4.28 bb)以及IMRST与IMRS之间(P = 0.02,平均差异 = 4.68 cm)。无论层厚和重建算法如何,两名阅片者之间的观察者间变异性均较低(0.82≥P≥0.99)。
LKV和SRF的半自动RCV测量与层厚、IR算法和核函数选择无关。这些发现表明,使用不同层厚和重建算法进行RCV的研究之间的比较是有效的。