• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于评估驾驶风格分类预测模型的系统方法。

A Systematic Methodology to Evaluate Prediction Models for Driving Style Classification.

机构信息

Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería de Sistemas Informáticos, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, 28031 Madrid, Spain.

Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Espíritu Santo, Samborondón 092301, Ecuador.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 18;20(6):1692. doi: 10.3390/s20061692.

DOI:10.3390/s20061692
PMID:32197384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7146739/
Abstract

Identifying driving styles using classification models with in-vehicle data can provide automated feedback to drivers on their driving behavior, particularly if they are driving safely. Although several classification models have been developed for this purpose, there is no consensus on which classifier performs better at identifying driving styles. Therefore, more research is needed to evaluate classification models by comparing performance metrics. In this paper, a data-driven machine-learning methodology for classifying driving styles is introduced. This methodology is grounded in well-established machine-learning (ML) methods and literature related to driving-styles research. The methodology is illustrated through a study involving data collected from 50 drivers from two different cities in a naturalistic setting. Five features were extracted from the raw data. Fifteen experts were involved in the data labeling to derive the ground truth of the dataset. The dataset fed five different models (Support Vector Machines (SVM), Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), fuzzy logic, k-Nearest Neighbor (kNN), and Random Forests (RF)). These models were evaluated in terms of a set of performance metrics and statistical tests. The experimental results from performance metrics showed that SVM outperformed the other four models, achieving an average accuracy of 0.96, F1-Score of 0.9595, Area Under the Curve (AUC) of 0.9730, and Kappa of 0.9375. In addition, Wilcoxon tests indicated that ANN predicts differently to the other four models. These promising results demonstrate that the proposed methodology may support researchers in making informed decisions about which ML model performs better for driving-styles classification.

摘要

使用车载数据的分类模型识别驾驶风格可以为驾驶员的驾驶行为提供自动化反馈,特别是如果他们的驾驶行为安全的话。尽管已经开发了几种分类模型,但对于哪种分类器在识别驾驶风格方面表现更好,尚未达成共识。因此,需要更多的研究通过比较性能指标来评估分类模型。本文提出了一种基于数据驱动的机器学习方法来对驾驶风格进行分类。该方法基于成熟的机器学习(ML)方法和与驾驶风格研究相关的文献。该方法通过一项涉及在自然环境中从两个不同城市的 50 名驾驶员收集数据的研究进行了说明。从原始数据中提取了五个特征。十五位专家参与了数据标注,以得出数据集的真实情况。该数据集馈送到五个不同的模型(支持向量机(SVM)、人工神经网络(ANN)、模糊逻辑、k-最近邻(kNN)和随机森林(RF))。这些模型根据一组性能指标和统计测试进行了评估。性能指标的实验结果表明,SVM 优于其他四个模型,平均准确率为 0.96,F1 得分为 0.9595,曲线下面积(AUC)为 0.9730,Kappa 为 0.9375。此外,Wilcoxon 检验表明,ANN 与其他四个模型的预测方式不同。这些有希望的结果表明,所提出的方法可以为研究人员提供有关哪种 ML 模型在驾驶风格分类方面表现更好的决策信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e73/7146739/4479d29d8136/sensors-20-01692-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e73/7146739/043e90088941/sensors-20-01692-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e73/7146739/4479d29d8136/sensors-20-01692-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e73/7146739/043e90088941/sensors-20-01692-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2e73/7146739/4479d29d8136/sensors-20-01692-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
A Systematic Methodology to Evaluate Prediction Models for Driving Style Classification.一种用于评估驾驶风格分类预测模型的系统方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 18;20(6):1692. doi: 10.3390/s20061692.
2
Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.采用机器学习和空间分析技术进行驾驶员风险评估:来自案例研究的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145193.
3
Detecting lane change maneuvers using SHRP2 naturalistic driving data: A comparative study machine learning techniques.利用 SHRP2 自然驾驶数据检测变道行为:机器学习技术的比较研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Jul;142:105578. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105578. Epub 2020 May 11.
4
Class-imbalanced crash prediction based on real-time traffic and weather data: A driving simulator study.基于实时交通和天气数据的不平衡碰撞预测:驾驶模拟器研究。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020;21(3):201-208. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1723794. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
5
Data-Driven Estimation of a Driving Safety Tolerance Zone Using Imbalanced Machine Learning.基于不平衡机器学习的数据驱动驾驶安全容忍区估计。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jul 15;22(14):5309. doi: 10.3390/s22145309.
6
Joint modeling strategy for using electronic medical records data to build machine learning models: an example of intracerebral hemorrhage.利用电子病历数据构建机器学习模型的联合建模策略:以脑出血为例。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2022 Oct 25;22(1):278. doi: 10.1186/s12911-022-02018-x.
7
Driving behavior recognition using EEG data from a simulated car-following experiment.基于模拟跟车实验中 EEG 数据的驾驶行为识别。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jul;116:30-40. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.11.010. Epub 2017 Nov 23.
8
Interpretable machine learning for evaluating risk factors of freeway crash severity.用于评估高速公路碰撞严重程度风险因素的可解释机器学习。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2024 Sep;31(3):534-550. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2024.2351972. Epub 2024 May 20.
9
A Machine-Learning Approach to Distinguish Passengers and Drivers Reading While Driving.一种基于机器学习的方法,用于区分驾驶时阅读的乘客和司机。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 19;19(14):3174. doi: 10.3390/s19143174.
10
Application of data mining algorithms for improving stress prediction of automobile drivers: A case study in Jordan.应用数据挖掘算法提高汽车驾驶员应激预测能力:以约旦为例的研究
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Nov;114:103474. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.103474. Epub 2019 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Review of Energy Management Methods for Fuel Cell Vehicles: From the Perspective of Driving Cycle Information.基于行驶循环信息视角的燃料电池汽车能量管理方法综述
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Oct 19;23(20):8571. doi: 10.3390/s23208571.
2
A Real-Time Recognition System of Driving Propensity Based on AutoNavi Navigation Data.基于高德导航数据的驾驶倾向性实时识别系统。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jun 28;22(13):4883. doi: 10.3390/s22134883.
3
Modeling Motorcyclists' Aggressive Driving Behavior Using Computational and Statistical Analysis of Real-Time Driving Data to Improve Road Safety and Reduce Accidents.

本文引用的文献

1
Driver behavior profiling: An investigation with different smartphone sensors and machine learning.驾驶员行为分析:基于不同智能手机传感器和机器学习的调查
PLoS One. 2017 Apr 10;12(4):e0174959. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174959. eCollection 2017.
2
The multidimensional driving style inventory a decade later: Review of the literature and re-evaluation of the scale.十年后的多维驾驶风格量表:文献综述与量表重新评估
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Aug;93:179-188. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.038. Epub 2016 May 18.
3
A Review of Intelligent Driving Style Analysis Systems and Related Artificial Intelligence Algorithms.
基于实时驾驶数据的计算和统计分析来建模摩托车驾驶员的侵略性驾驶行为,以提高道路安全和减少事故。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7704. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137704.
4
Driver Behavior Profiling and Recognition Using Deep-Learning Methods: In Accordance with Traffic Regulations and Experts Guidelines.基于交通法规和专家指南的深度学习方法的驾驶员行为分析与识别
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;19(3):1470. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031470.
5
A Collision Relationship-Based Driving Behavior Decision-Making Method for an Intelligent Land Vehicle at a Disorderly Intersection via DRQN.一种基于碰撞关系的智能陆地车辆在无序交叉路口通过深度循环Q网络的驾驶行为决策方法
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;22(2):636. doi: 10.3390/s22020636.
6
A systematic review on sensor-based driver behaviour studies: coherent taxonomy, motivations, challenges, recommendations, substantial analysis and future directions.基于传感器的驾驶员行为研究的系统综述:连贯的分类法、动机、挑战、建议、实质分析及未来方向。
PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 Aug 25;7:e632. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.632. eCollection 2021.
7
A PID-Type Fuzzy Logic Controller-Based Approach for Motion Control Applications.一种基于PID型模糊逻辑控制器的运动控制应用方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Sep 17;20(18):5323. doi: 10.3390/s20185323.
智能驾驶风格分析系统及相关人工智能算法综述
Sensors (Basel). 2015 Dec 4;15(12):30653-82. doi: 10.3390/s151229822.
4
A Review of Research on Driving Styles and Road Safety.驾驶风格与道路安全研究综述
Hum Factors. 2015 Nov;57(7):1248-75. doi: 10.1177/0018720815591313. Epub 2015 Jun 30.
5
Fuzzy logic: A "simple" solution for complexities in neurosciences?模糊逻辑:解决神经科学复杂性的“简单”方法?
Surg Neurol Int. 2011 Feb 26;2:24. doi: 10.4103/2152-7806.77177.
6
A user's guide to support vector machines.支持向量机用户指南。
Methods Mol Biol. 2010;609:223-39. doi: 10.1007/978-1-60327-241-4_13.
7
A primer on the use of modern missing-data methods in psychosomatic medicine research.心身医学研究中现代缺失数据方法的使用入门。
Psychosom Med. 2006 May-Jun;68(3):427-36. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221275.75056.d8.
8
The multidimensional driving style inventory--scale construct and validation.多维驾驶风格量表——量表构建与验证
Accid Anal Prev. 2004 May;36(3):323-32. doi: 10.1016/S0001-4575(03)00010-1.
9
Human factors in the causation of road traffic crashes.道路交通事故成因中的人为因素。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2000;16(9):819-26. doi: 10.1023/a:1007649804201.
10
Behavioral correlates of individual differences in road-traffic crash risk: an examination method and findings.道路交通碰撞风险个体差异的行为关联:一种检验方法及研究结果
Psychol Bull. 1993 Mar;113(2):279-94. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.113.2.279.