• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用机器学习和空间分析技术进行驾驶员风险评估:来自案例研究的见解。

Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.

机构信息

College of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

College of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145193.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17145193
PMID:32708404
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7400276/
Abstract

Traffic violations usually caused by aggressive driving behavior are often seen as a primary contributor to traffic crashes. Violations are either caused by an unintentional or deliberate act of drivers that jeopardize the lives of fellow drivers, pedestrians, and property. This study is aimed to investigate different traffic violations (overspeeding, wrong-way driving, illegal parking, non-compliance traffic control devices, etc.) using spatial analysis and different machine learning methods. Georeferenced violation data along two expressways (S308 and S219) for the year 2016 was obtained from the traffic police department, in the city of Luzhou, China. Detailed descriptive analysis of the data showed that wrong-way driving was the most common violation type observed. Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation in the ArcMap Geographic Information System (GIS) was used to develop violation hotspots zones to guide on efficient use of limited resources during the treatment of high-risk sites. Lastly, a systematic Machine Learning (ML) framework, such as K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) models (using k = 3, 5, 7, 10, and 12), support vector machine (SVM), and CN2 Rule Inducer, was utilized for classification and prediction of each violation type as a function of several explanatory variables. The predictive performance of proposed ML models was examined using different evaluation metrics, such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), F-score, precision, recall, specificity, and run time. The results also showed that the KNN model with k = 7 using manhattan evaluation had an accuracy of 99% and outperformed the SVM and CN2 Rule Inducer. The outcome of this study could provide the practitioners and decision-makers with essential insights for appropriate engineering and traffic control measures to improve the safety of road-users.

摘要

交通违法行为通常是由攻击性驾驶行为引起的,往往被视为交通事故的主要原因。违规行为要么是驾驶员无意或故意的行为造成的,危及到其他驾驶员、行人和财产的生命安全。本研究旨在使用空间分析和不同的机器学习方法来调查不同的交通违法行为(超速、逆行驾驶、非法停车、不遵守交通控制装置等)。从中国泸州市交通警察部门获得了 2016 年两条高速公路(S308 和 S219)的违规地理参考数据。对数据的详细描述性分析表明,逆行驾驶是观察到的最常见的违规类型。在 ArcMap 地理信息系统(GIS)中使用反距离权重(IDW)插值来开发违规热点区域,以指导在处理高风险地点时有效利用有限的资源。最后,利用 K 最近邻(KNN)模型(k = 3、5、7、10 和 12)、支持向量机(SVM)和 CN2 规则诱导器等系统机器学习(ML)框架,根据几个解释变量对每种违规类型进行分类和预测。使用不同的评估指标,如曲线下面积(AUC)、F 分数、精度、召回率、特异性和运行时间,检查了所提出的 ML 模型的预测性能。结果还表明,曼哈顿评估中 k = 7 的 KNN 模型的准确率为 99%,优于 SVM 和 CN2 规则诱导器。这项研究的结果可以为从业者和决策者提供必要的见解,以采取适当的工程和交通控制措施,提高道路使用者的安全性。

相似文献

1
Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.采用机器学习和空间分析技术进行驾驶员风险评估:来自案例研究的见解。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 18;17(14):5193. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17145193.
2
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
3
Speed violation analysis of heavy vehicles on highways using spatial analysis and machine learning algorithms.利用空间分析和机器学习算法分析高速公路上重型车辆的超速行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Jun;155:106098. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106098. Epub 2021 Apr 7.
4
A systematic approach to macro-level safety assessment and contributing factors analysis considering traffic crashes and violations.考虑交通事故和违规行为的宏观安全评估及影响因素分析的系统方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Jan;194:107323. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2023.107323. Epub 2023 Oct 19.
5
Applying machine learning approaches to analyze the vulnerable road-users' crashes at statewide traffic analysis zones.运用机器学习方法分析全州交通分析区弱势道路使用者的碰撞事故。
J Safety Res. 2019 Sep;70:275-288. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2019.04.008. Epub 2019 May 10.
6
Predicting Future Driving Risk of Crash-Involved Drivers Based on a Systematic Machine Learning Framework.基于系统机器学习框架预测涉及碰撞的驾驶员未来驾驶风险。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Jan 25;16(3):334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16030334.
7
A novel framework for crash frequency prediction: Geographic support vector regression based on agent-based activity models in Greater Melbourne.一种新的事故频率预测框架:基于大墨尔本基于主体活动模型的地理支持向量回归。
Accid Anal Prev. 2024 Nov;207:107747. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2024.107747. Epub 2024 Aug 19.
8
A Systematic Methodology to Evaluate Prediction Models for Driving Style Classification.一种用于评估驾驶风格分类预测模型的系统方法。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 18;20(6):1692. doi: 10.3390/s20061692.
9
Mid-term prediction of at-fault crash driver frequency using fusion deep learning with city-level traffic violation data.利用融合深度学习和城市级交通违法数据对事故肇事司机出险频率进行中期预测。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Feb;150:105910. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105910. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
10
Investigating influence factors of traffic violation using multinomial logit method.运用多项逻辑回归方法调查交通违法影响因素。
Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot. 2021 Mar;28(1):78-85. doi: 10.1080/17457300.2020.1843499. Epub 2020 Nov 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Driving Pattern Analysis, Gear Shift Classification, and Fuel Efficiency in Light-Duty Vehicles: A Machine Learning Approach Using GPS and OBD II PID Signals.轻型车辆的驾驶模式分析、换挡分类及燃油效率:一种使用GPS和OBD II PID信号的机器学习方法
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Jun 28;25(13):4043. doi: 10.3390/s25134043.
2
Temporal Instability of Factors Affecting Injury Severity in Helmet-Wearing and Non-Helmet-Wearing Motorcycle Crashes: A Random Parameter Approach with Heterogeneity in Means and Variances.头盔佩戴与未佩戴摩托车事故中影响损伤严重程度因素的时间不稳定性:一种带有均值和方差异质性的随机参数方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 24;19(17):10526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191710526.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Risky and Aggressive Driving Behavior among Taxi Drivers: Do Spatio-Temporal Attributes Matter?预测出租车司机的高风险驾驶行为和侵略性驾驶行为:时空属性重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jun 2;17(11):3937. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17113937.
2
Short Term Traffic State Prediction via Hyperparameter Optimization Based Classifiers.基于超参数优化的分类器进行短期交通状态预测。
Sensors (Basel). 2020 Jan 27;20(3):685. doi: 10.3390/s20030685.
3
The Dilemma of Road Safety in the Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia: Consequences and Prevention Strategies.
Assessment of Significant Factors Affecting Frequent Lane-Changing Related to Road Safety: An Integrated Approach of the AHP-BWM Model.
评估影响频繁变道相关道路安全的显著因素:层次分析法-逼近理想解排序法的综合方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Oct 11;18(20):10628. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182010628.
4
A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promoting Safe Pedestrian Crossing in Urban Areas.一种用于促进城市地区安全行人过街的新型行人过街服务水平(PCLOS)方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 20;18(16):8813. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168813.
5
Exploring the Injury Severity Risk Factors in Fatal Crashes with Neural Network.利用神经网络探索致命撞车事故中的损伤严重程度风险因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 14;17(20):7466. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207466.
沙特阿拉伯东部省份道路安全的困境:后果与预防策略。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Dec 24;17(1):157. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17010157.
4
Traffic climate, driver behaviour, and accidents involvement in China.中国的交通气候、驾驶行为与事故卷入。
Accid Anal Prev. 2019 Jan;122:119-126. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.09.007. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
5
An examination of the construct and predictive validity of the self-reported speeding behavior model.自我报告超速行为模型的结构效度和预测效度检验。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 Feb;99(Pt A):66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.11.015. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
6
Analysis of driver injury severity in wrong-way driving crashes on controlled-access highways.分析高速公路错误驾驶事故中驾驶员的受伤严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.05.022. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
7
The odds of wrong-way crashes and resulting fatalities: A comprehensive analysis.错误行驶方向的碰撞和由此导致的死亡的几率:全面分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Mar;88:105-16. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.012. Epub 2015 Dec 30.
8
Wrong-way driving crashes on French divided roads.法国分隔式道路上的逆向行驶撞车事故。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Feb;75:69-76. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.11.002. Epub 2014 Nov 22.
9
Personality and attitudes as predictors of risky driving among older drivers.个性与态度对老年驾驶员危险驾驶行为的预测作用
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:318-24. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.07.022. Epub 2014 Aug 8.
10
Interaction between socio-demographic characteristics: traffic rule violations and traffic crash history for young drivers.社会人口统计学特征之间的相互作用:年轻驾驶员的交通规则违规行为与交通事故历史。
Accid Anal Prev. 2014 Nov;72:95-104. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2014.06.015. Epub 2014 Jul 12.