Suppr超能文献

包括5%葡萄糖和富血小板血浆的再生注射疗法治疗腕管综合征:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Regenerative Injections Including 5% Dextrose and Platelet-Rich Plasma for the Treatment of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Lin Chih-Peng, Chang Ke-Vin, Huang Yi-Kai, Wu Wei-Ting, Özçakar Levent

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10048, Taiwan.

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei 10048, Taiwan.

出版信息

Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2020 Mar 18;13(3):49. doi: 10.3390/ph13030049.

Abstract

This network meta-analysis aimed to integrate the available direct and indirect evidence on regenerative injections-including 5% dextrose (D5W) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)-for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Literature reports comparing D5W and PRP injections with non-surgical managements of CTS were systematically reviewed. The main outcome was the standardized mean difference (SMD) of the symptom severity and functional status scales of the Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire at three months after injections. Ranking probabilities of the SMD of each treatment were acquired by using simulation. Ten studies with 497 patients and comparing five treatments (D5W, PRP, splinting, corticosteroid, and normal saline) were included. The results of the simulation of rank probabilities showed that D5W injection was likely to be the best treatment, followed by PRP injection, in terms of clinical effectiveness in providing symptom relief. With respect to functional improvement, splinting ranked higher than PRP and D5W injections. Lastly, corticosteroid and saline injections were consistently ranked fourth and fifth in terms of therapeutic effects on symptom severity and functional status. D5W and PRP injections are more effective than splinting and corticosteroid or saline injection for relieving the symptoms of CTS. Compared with splinting, D5W and PRP injections do not provide better functional recovery. More studies investigating the long-term effectiveness of regenerative injections in CTS are needed in the future.

摘要

这项网络荟萃分析旨在整合有关再生注射(包括5%葡萄糖(D5W)和富血小板血浆(PRP))治疗腕管综合征(CTS)的现有直接和间接证据。系统回顾了比较D5W和PRP注射与CTS非手术治疗的文献报告。主要结局是注射后三个月时波士顿腕管综合征问卷症状严重程度和功能状态量表的标准化均数差(SMD)。通过模拟获得每种治疗SMD的排序概率。纳入了10项研究,共497例患者,比较了五种治疗方法(D5W、PRP、夹板固定、皮质类固醇和生理盐水)。排序概率模拟结果显示,就缓解症状的临床有效性而言,D5W注射可能是最佳治疗方法,其次是PRP注射。在功能改善方面,夹板固定的排名高于PRP和D5W注射。最后,就对症状严重程度和功能状态的治疗效果而言,皮质类固醇和生理盐水注射一直排在第四和第五位。D5W和PRP注射在缓解CTS症状方面比夹板固定、皮质类固醇或生理盐水注射更有效。与夹板固定相比,D5W和PRP注射并不能带来更好的功能恢复。未来需要更多研究来调查再生注射对CTS的长期有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验