• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在加拿大的中风细胞治疗试验中,患者和医生参与的潜在障碍和促进因素有哪些?一项利益攸关方访谈研究。

What are potential barriers and enablers to patient and physician participation in Canadian cell therapy trials for stroke? A stakeholder interview study.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Clinical Epidemiology Program, Blueprint Translational Research Group, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e034354. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034354.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034354
PMID:32198301
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7103795/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Early phase cell therapy trials face many barriers to successful, timely completion. To optimise the conduct of a planned clinical trial of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy for chronic stroke, we sought patient and physician views on possible barriers and enablers that may influence their participation.

DESIGN

Semistructured interview study.

SETTING

Patients were recruited from three rehabilitation centres in Ontario, Canada; physicians were recruited from across Canada through snowball sampling.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirteen chronic stroke patients (patients who had experienced a stroke at least 3 months prior; 10 male, 3 female) and 15 physicians (stroke physiatrists; 9 male, 6 female) participated in our interview study. Data adequacy was reached after 13 patient interviews and 13 physician interviews.

METHODS

Interview guides and directed content analysis were based on the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Interviews were coded, and relevant themes were identified.

RESULTS

Most patients were optimistic about participating in an MSC therapy clinical trial, and many expressed interest in participating, even if it was a randomised controlled trial with the possibility of being allocated to a placebo group. However, the method of administration of cells (intravascular preferred to intracerebral) and goal of the trial (efficacy preferred to safety) may influence their intention to participate. All physicians expressed interest in screening for the trial, though many stated they were less motivated to contribute to a safety trial. Physicians also identified several time-related barriers and the need for resources to ensure feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel application of the TDF helped identify key potential barriers and enablers prior to conducting a clinical trial of MSC therapy for stroke. This will be used to refine the design and conduct of our trial. A similar approach may be adopted by other investigators considering early phase cell therapy trials.

摘要

目的

早期细胞治疗试验面临许多障碍,难以成功及时完成。为了优化计划中的骨髓间充质干细胞(MSC)治疗慢性中风的临床试验的实施,我们调查了患者和医生对可能影响其参与的障碍和促进因素的看法。

设计

半结构式访谈研究。

地点

患者在加拿大安大略省的三家康复中心招募;医生通过滚雪球抽样在加拿大各地招募。

参与者

13 名慢性中风患者(中风至少 3 个月前发病;10 名男性,3 名女性)和 15 名医生(中风物理治疗师;9 名男性,6 名女性)参加了我们的访谈研究。进行了 13 次患者访谈和 13 次医生访谈后,达到了数据充足性。

方法

访谈指南和定向内容分析基于理论领域框架(TDF)。对访谈进行编码,并确定了相关主题。

结果

大多数患者对参与 MSC 治疗临床试验持乐观态度,许多患者表示有兴趣参与,即使这是一项随机对照试验,有可能被分配到安慰剂组。然而,细胞的给药方式(血管内优于脑内)和试验的目标(疗效优于安全性)可能会影响他们的参与意愿。所有医生都表示有兴趣参与该试验的筛选,但许多医生表示,他们对参与安全性试验的动力较小。医生还确定了一些与时间相关的障碍和资源需求,以确保可行性。

结论

在进行骨髓间充质干细胞治疗中风的临床试验之前,该 TDF 的新颖应用有助于确定关键的潜在障碍和促进因素。这将用于改进我们试验的设计和实施。其他考虑早期细胞治疗试验的研究人员也可以采用类似的方法。

相似文献

1
What are potential barriers and enablers to patient and physician participation in Canadian cell therapy trials for stroke? A stakeholder interview study.在加拿大的中风细胞治疗试验中,患者和医生参与的潜在障碍和促进因素有哪些?一项利益攸关方访谈研究。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 19;10(3):e034354. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034354.
2
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis.运用理论领域框架探讨临床试验中医护人员行为改变的障碍与促进因素:个体化低温血液透析试验的案例研究
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1965-9.
3
Navigating choice in the face of uncertainty: using a theory informed qualitative approach to identifying potential patient barriers and enablers to participating in an early phase chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy trial.在不确定性面前做出选择:运用理论指导的定性方法,确定参与早期嵌合抗原受体 T(CAR-T)细胞治疗试验的潜在患者障碍和促进因素。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 19;11(3):e043929. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043929.
4
Hematologists' barriers and enablers to screening and recruiting patients to a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy trial: a theory-informed interview study.血液科医生在筛选和招募患者参加嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗试验方面的障碍与促进因素:一项基于理论的访谈研究
Trials. 2021 Mar 25;22(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05121-y.
5
Understanding the Canadian adult CT head rule trial: use of the theoretical domains framework for process evaluation.理解加拿大成人 CT 头部规则试验:使用理论领域框架进行过程评估。
Implement Sci. 2013 Feb 21;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-25.
6
Using the theoretical domains framework to identify barriers and enablers to pediatric asthma management in primary care settings.运用理论领域框架来识别基层医疗环境中儿童哮喘管理的障碍和促进因素。
J Asthma. 2018 Nov;55(11):1223-1236. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1408820. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
7
Understanding potential barriers and enablers to a perioperative early phase cell therapy trial.了解围手术期早期细胞治疗试验的潜在障碍和促进因素。
Cytotherapy. 2022 Jun;24(6):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.08.008. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
8
Understanding practice: factors that influence physician hand hygiene compliance.了解实践:影响医生手部卫生依从性的因素。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2014 Dec;35(12):1511-20. doi: 10.1086/678597. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
9
Identifying the barriers and enablers for a triage, treatment, and transfer clinical intervention to manage acute stroke patients in the emergency department: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework (TDF).识别急诊科用于管理急性中风患者的分诊、治疗和转运临床干预措施的障碍与促进因素:一项使用理论域框架(TDF)的系统评价
Implement Sci. 2016 Nov 28;11(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0524-1.
10
So You Want to Give Stem Cells to Babies? Neonatologists and Parents' Views to Optimize Clinical Trials.想要给婴儿使用干细胞?优化临床试验,听听新生儿科医生和家长的意见。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jul;210:41-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Mapping provider and consumer voices using the AACTT framework: a focus group study of advance care planning.使用AACTT框架映射提供者和消费者的声音:一项关于预先护理计划的焦点小组研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 21;25(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12240-8.
2
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus conservative management for adults with uncomplicated symptomatic gallstones: the C-GALL RCT.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与保守治疗成人单纯症状性胆囊结石的比较:C-GALL RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Jun;28(26):1-151. doi: 10.3310/MNBY3104.
3
Changing patient preferences toward better trial recruitment: an ethical analysis.改变患者对更好的试验招募的偏好:伦理分析。
Trials. 2023 Mar 28;24(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07258-4.
4
Challenges and opportunities for conducting pre-hospital trauma trials: a behavioural investigation.开展院前创伤试验的挑战与机遇:行为学研究。
Trials. 2023 Mar 2;24(1):157. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07184-5.
5
The role of mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for ischemic stroke and recent research developments.间充质干细胞移植在缺血性脑卒中中的作用及近期研究进展。
Front Neurol. 2022 Nov 16;13:1000777. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1000777. eCollection 2022.
6
Behavioural optimisation to address trial conduct challenges: case study in the UK-REBOA trial.行为优化以应对试验实施挑战:英国 UK-REBOA 试验案例研究。
Trials. 2022 May 12;23(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06341-6.
7
How can behavioural science help us design better trials?行为科学如何帮助我们设计出更好的试验?
Trials. 2021 Dec 4;22(1):882. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05853-x.
8
Hematologists' barriers and enablers to screening and recruiting patients to a chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy trial: a theory-informed interview study.血液科医生在筛选和招募患者参加嵌合抗原受体(CAR)T细胞治疗试验方面的障碍与促进因素:一项基于理论的访谈研究
Trials. 2021 Mar 25;22(1):230. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05121-y.

本文引用的文献

1
Action, actor, context, target, time (AACTT): a framework for specifying behaviour.行为、行为者、环境、目标、时间(AACTT):一个用于指定行为的框架。
Implement Sci. 2019 Dec 5;14(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0951-x.
2
From the Lab to Patients: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Stroke.从实验室到患者:间充质干细胞治疗中风的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Transl Stroke Res. 2020 Jun;11(3):345-364. doi: 10.1007/s12975-019-00736-5. Epub 2019 Oct 25.
3
So You Want to Give Stem Cells to Babies? Neonatologists and Parents' Views to Optimize Clinical Trials.想要给婴儿使用干细胞?优化临床试验,听听新生儿科医生和家长的意见。
J Pediatr. 2019 Jul;210:41-47.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.03.005. Epub 2019 Apr 17.
4
Socioeconomic Status and Racial or Ethnic Differences in Participation: Web-Based Survey.参与度方面的社会经济地位及种族或民族差异:基于网络的调查
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 10;8(4):e11865. doi: 10.2196/11865.
5
Determinants of participation in voluntary work: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal cohort studies.参与志愿工作的决定因素:纵向队列研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Nov 2;18(1):1213. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-6077-2.
6
Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Stroke: A Systematic Review of Literature in Pre-Clinical and Clinical Research.间质干细胞疗法治疗中风:临床前和临床研究文献的系统综述。
Cell Transplant. 2018 Dec;27(12):1723-1730. doi: 10.1177/0963689718806846. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
7
Clinical trials recruitment planning: A proposed framework from the Clinical Trials Transformation Initiative.临床试验招募规划:来自临床试验转型倡议的一个拟议框架
Contemp Clin Trials. 2018 Mar;66:74-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2018.01.003. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
8
A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems.运用行为改变理论领域框架调查实施问题指南。
Implement Sci. 2017 Jun 21;12(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0605-9.
9
Barriers and facilitators to healthcare professional behaviour change in clinical trials using the Theoretical Domains Framework: a case study of a trial of individualized temperature-reduced haemodialysis.运用理论领域框架探讨临床试验中医护人员行为改变的障碍与促进因素:个体化低温血液透析试验的案例研究
Trials. 2017 May 22;18(1):227. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-1965-9.
10
Stroke Risk Factors, Genetics, and Prevention.中风风险因素、遗传学与预防
Circ Res. 2017 Feb 3;120(3):472-495. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.116.308398.