Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Cytotherapy. 2022 Jun;24(6):629-638. doi: 10.1016/j.jcyt.2021.08.008. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
Early-phase cell therapy clinical trials depend on patient and physician involvement, yet barriers can impede their participation.
To optimize engagement for a planned cell therapy trial to prevent perioperative cardiac complications, the authors conducted semi-structured interviews with at-risk patients and physicians who could potentially be involved in the study. The authors used the theoretical domains framework to systematically identify potential barriers and enablers.
Forty-one interviews were conducted to reach data saturation, and four overall potential barriers to participation (themes) were identified. Theme 1 emphasizes that patients and physicians need accessible information to better understand the benefits and risks of the novel therapy and trial procedures and to address misconceptions. Theme 2 underscores the need for clarity on whether the trial's primary purpose is safety or efficacy, as this may influence patient and physician decisions. Theme 3 recognizes the resource and logistic realities for patients (e.g., convenient follow-up appointments) and physicians (e.g., personnel to assist in trial procedures, competing priorities). Theme 4 describes the importance of social influences (e.g., physicians and family, peers/colleagues) that may affect decisions to participate and the importance of patient preferences (e.g., availability of physicians to discuss the trial, including caregivers in discussions).
Prospectively addressing these issues may help optimize feasibility prior to conducting an expensive, resource-intensive trial.
早期细胞治疗临床试验依赖于患者和医生的参与,但障碍可能会阻碍他们的参与。
为了优化计划中的细胞治疗试验的参与度,以预防围手术期心脏并发症,作者对可能参与研究的高危患者和医生进行了半结构化访谈。作者使用理论领域框架系统地识别潜在的障碍和促进因素。
进行了 41 次访谈以达到数据饱和,并确定了四个总体潜在的参与障碍(主题)。主题 1 强调患者和医生需要易于获取的信息,以更好地了解新疗法和试验程序的益处和风险,并解决误解。主题 2 强调需要明确试验的主要目的是安全性还是疗效,因为这可能会影响患者和医生的决策。主题 3 认识到患者(例如,方便的随访预约)和医生(例如,协助试验程序的人员、竞争优先级)的资源和后勤现实。主题 4 描述了社会影响(例如,医生和家人、同行/同事)的重要性,这些影响可能会影响参与决策的意愿,以及患者偏好(例如,是否有医生讨论试验,包括在讨论中包括照顾者)的重要性。
前瞻性地解决这些问题可能有助于在进行昂贵、资源密集型试验之前优化可行性。