• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情背景下的卫生安全能力:对 182 个国家《国际卫生条例》年度报告数据的分析。

Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries.

机构信息

World Health Organisation, WHO Health Emergency Program, Geneva, Switzerland.

World Health Organisation, WHO Health Emergency Program, Geneva, Switzerland.

出版信息

Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.

DOI:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5
PMID:32199075
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7271261/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Public health measures to prevent, detect, and respond to events are essential to control public health risks, including infectious disease outbreaks, as highlighted in the International Health Regulations (IHR). In light of the outbreak of 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19), we aimed to review existing health security capacities against public health risks and events.

METHODS

We used 18 indicators from the IHR State Party Annual Reporting (SPAR) tool and associated data from national SPAR reports to develop five indices: (1) prevent, (2) detect, (3) respond, (4) enabling function, and (5) operational readiness. We used SPAR 2018 data for all of the indicators and categorised countries into five levels across the indices, in which level 1 indicated the lowest level of national capacity and level 5 the highest. We also analysed data at the regional level (using the six geographical WHO regions).

FINDINGS

Of 182 countries, 52 (28%) had prevent capacities at levels 1 or 2, and 60 (33%) had response capacities at levels 1 or 2. 81 (45%) countries had prevent capacities and 78 (43%) had response capacities at levels 4 or 5, indicating that these countries were operationally ready. 138 (76%) countries scored more highly in the detect index than in the other indices. 44 (24%) countries did not have an effective enabling function for public health risks and events, including infectious disease outbreaks (7 [4%] at level 1 and 37 [20%] at level 2). 102 (56%) countries had level 4 or level 5 enabling function capacities in place. 32 (18%) countries had low readiness (2 [1%] at level 1 and 30 [17%] at level 2), and 104 (57%) countries were operationally ready to prevent, detect, and control an outbreak of a novel infectious disease (66 [36%] at level 4 and 38 [21%] at level 5).

INTERPRETATION

Countries vary widely in terms of their capacity to prevent, detect, and respond to outbreaks. Half of all countries analysed have strong operational readiness capacities in place, which suggests that an effective response to potential health emergencies could be enabled, including to COVID-19. Findings from local risk assessments are needed to fully understand national readiness capacities in relation to COVID-19. Capacity building and collaboration between countries are needed to strengthen global readiness for outbreak control.

FUNDING

None.

摘要

背景

公共卫生措施对于预防、检测和应对事件至关重要,这些措施是控制公共卫生风险的关键,包括传染病的爆发,正如《国际卫生条例(IHR)》所强调的那样。鉴于 2019 年新型冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的爆发,我们旨在审查现有的卫生安全能力,以应对公共卫生风险和事件。

方法

我们使用了 18 项《国际卫生条例(IHR)》缔约国年度报告(SPAR)工具中的指标以及国家 SPAR 报告中的相关数据,制定了五个指数:(1)预防、(2)检测、(3)应对、(4)赋权功能和(5)运营准备就绪。我们使用了 2018 年的 SPAR 数据来计算所有指标,并将各国分为五个指数等级,其中 1 级表示国家能力最低,5 级表示国家能力最高。我们还按区域(使用世卫组织的六个地理区域)对数据进行了分析。

结果

在 182 个国家中,有 52 个(28%)的预防能力处于 1 级或 2 级,有 60 个(33%)的应对能力处于 1 级或 2 级。有 81 个(45%)的国家的预防能力和 78 个(43%)的应对能力处于 4 级或 5 级,表明这些国家已经具备了运作能力。有 138 个(76%)的国家在检测指数上的得分高于其他指数。有 44 个(24%)的国家在公共卫生风险和事件方面没有有效的赋权功能,包括传染病的爆发(1 级有 7 个国家[4%],2 级有 37 个国家[20%])。有 102 个(56%)的国家已经具备了 4 级或 5 级的赋权功能。有 32 个(18%)的国家准备程度较低(1 级有 2 个国家[1%],2 级有 30 个国家[17%]),有 104 个(57%)的国家已经具备了预防、检测和控制新型传染病爆发的运作能力(4 级有 66 个国家[36%],5 级有 38 个国家[21%])。

解释

各国在预防、检测和应对疫情方面的能力差异很大。分析的一半国家都具备了较强的运作能力,这表明能够有效应对潜在的卫生紧急情况,包括 COVID-19。需要进行地方风险评估,以全面了解各国在 COVID-19 方面的准备能力。需要在国家之间开展能力建设和合作,以加强全球对疫情控制的准备。

资金来源

无。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe82/7271261/55b96e26f62e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe82/7271261/8d17051ca00a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe82/7271261/55b96e26f62e/gr2_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe82/7271261/8d17051ca00a/gr1_lrg.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe82/7271261/55b96e26f62e/gr2_lrg.jpg

相似文献

1
Health security capacities in the context of COVID-19 outbreak: an analysis of International Health Regulations annual report data from 182 countries.新冠疫情背景下的卫生安全能力:对 182 个国家《国际卫生条例》年度报告数据的分析。
Lancet. 2020 Mar 28;395(10229):1047-1053. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30553-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
2
Epidemic preparedness and response capacity against infectious disease outbreaks in 186 countries, 2018-2022.186 个国家 2018-2022 年传染病疫情防范和应对能力。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 Nov 7;24(1):1258. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-10168-8.
3
Fighting against the common enemy of COVID-19: a practice of building a community with a shared future for mankind.抗击新冠肺炎这一共同敌人:构建人类命运共同体的实践。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2020 Apr 7;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40249-020-00650-1.
4
The Role of the Global Health Development/Eastern Mediterranean Public Health Network and the Eastern Mediterranean Field Epidemiology Training Programs in Preparedness for COVID-19.全球卫生发展/东地中海公共卫生网络和东地中海现场流行病学培训计划在 COVID-19 应对准备中的作用。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Mar 27;6(1):e18503. doi: 10.2196/18503.
5
Global regulatory agility during covid-19 and other health emergencies.新冠疫情及其他卫生紧急情况期间的全球监管灵活性。
BMJ. 2020 Apr 27;369:m1575. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m1575.
6
Impact of international travel and border control measures on the global spread of the novel 2019 coronavirus outbreak.国际旅行和边境管控措施对 2019 年新型冠状病毒全球传播的影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Mar 31;117(13):7504-7509. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002616117. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
7
Global Preparedness Against COVID-19: We Must Leverage the Power of Digital Health.全球防范 COVID-19:我们必须利用数字健康的力量。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020 Apr 16;6(2):e18980. doi: 10.2196/18980.
8
Rethinking the COVID-19 Pandemic: Back to Public Health.重新思考 COVID-19 大流行:回归公共卫生。
Ann Glob Health. 2020 Oct 8;86(1):133. doi: 10.5334/aogh.3084.
9
WHO International Health Regulations Emergency Committee for the COVID-19 outbreak.世界卫生组织 COVID-19 疫情国际卫生条例突发事件委员会。
Epidemiol Health. 2020;42:e2020013. doi: 10.4178/epih.e2020013. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
10
Declining Public Health Protections within Autocratic Regimes: Impact on Global Public Health Security, Infectious Disease Outbreaks, Epidemics, and Pandemics.专制政权下公共卫生保护措施的减少:对全球公共卫生安全、传染病暴发、流行病和大流行的影响。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2020 Jun;35(3):237-246. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X20000424. Epub 2020 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Timely identification of deteriorating patients from acute respiratory infections at the primary care level in the COVID-19 era: quality improvement collaborative.2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行期间基层医疗中急性呼吸道感染患者病情恶化的及时识别:质量改进协作项目
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 1;14(3):e003390. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003390.
2
Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the diagnosis, tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes of colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.2019年冠状病毒病大流行对结直肠癌诊断、肿瘤特征及生存结局的影响:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Saudi Med. 2025 May-Jun;45(3):169-176. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2025.169. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Ten years of global disease detection and counting: program accomplishments and lessons learned in building global health security.十年全球疾病监测与统计:全球卫生安全建设中的项目成就与经验教训
BMC Public Health. 2019 May 10;19(Suppl 3):510. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6769-2.
2
Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China.中国武汉地区 2019 年新型冠状病毒感染患者的临床特征。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 15;395(10223):497-506. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30183-5. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
3
A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019.
Economic Agents' Behaviors During the Coronavirus Pandemic: Theoretical Overview and Prospective Approach.
新冠疫情期间经济主体的行为:理论概述与前瞻性方法
J Knowl Econ. 2022 Apr 7:1-29. doi: 10.1007/s13132-022-01027-5.
4
Impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on national security issues: Indonesia as a case study.新冠疫情对国家安全问题的影响:以印度尼西亚为例
Secur J. 2022;35(4):1067-1086. doi: 10.1057/s41284-021-00314-1. Epub 2021 Oct 6.
5
Health Literacy of the Inland Population in Mitigation Phase 3.2 of the COVID-19 Pandemic in Portugal: A Descriptive Cross-Sectional Study.葡萄牙新冠疫情缓解阶段3.2中内陆人口的健康素养:一项描述性横断面研究
Port J Public Health. 2020 Dec 14;38(2):1-11. doi: 10.1159/000511216.
6
Learning from COVID-19: A Systematic Review of the IHR-SPAR Framework's Role in the Pandemic Response.从新冠疫情中学习:对《国际卫生条例》-战略准备和应对框架在疫情应对中作用的系统评价
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 27;22(5):695. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22050695.
7
Sociocultural practices and COVID-19 prevention: A qualitative study of Mtwara, Shinyanga, and Arusha, Tanzania.社会文化习俗与新冠疫情预防:对坦桑尼亚姆特瓦拉、希尼安加和阿鲁沙的定性研究
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Apr 18;16(3):713. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i3.713. eCollection 2025.
8
Why do International Health Regulations self-assessment capacities (SPAR) scores not predict COVID-19 control outcomes? - analysis of the relationship between SPAR scores and COVID-19 resilience scores in 2021.为何《国际卫生条例》自我评估能力(SPAR)得分无法预测新冠疫情防控成果?——2021年SPAR得分与新冠疫情应对能力得分之间的关系分析
Global Health. 2025 Apr 15;21(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01111-w.
9
Measuring the Nursing Work Environment during Public Health Emergencies: Scale Adaptation and Validation.公共卫生紧急事件期间护理工作环境的测量:量表的改编与验证
J Nurs Manag. 2024 Mar 5;2024:9910079. doi: 10.1155/2024/9910079. eCollection 2024.
10
Normative convergence between global health security and universal health coverage: a qualitative analysis of international health negotiations in the wake of COVID-19.全球卫生安全与全民健康覆盖之间的规范趋同:对新冠疫情后国际卫生谈判的定性分析
Global Health. 2025 Feb 24;21(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12992-025-01099-3.
2019 年中国肺炎患者中的一种新型冠状病毒。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):727-733. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2001017. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
4
Another Decade, Another Coronavirus.又一个十年,又一场冠状病毒疫情。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Feb 20;382(8):760-762. doi: 10.1056/NEJMe2001126. Epub 2020 Jan 24.
5
Joint external evaluation of the International Health Regulation (2005) capacities: current status and lessons learnt in the WHO African region.《国际卫生条例(2005)》能力联合外部评估:世卫组织非洲区域的现状与经验教训
BMJ Glob Health. 2019 Nov 1;4(6):e001312. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2018-001312. eCollection 2019.
6
Anti-Vaccine Decision-Making and Measles Resurgence in the United States.美国的反疫苗决策与麻疹疫情卷土重来
Glob Pediatr Health. 2019 Jul 24;6:2333794X19862949. doi: 10.1177/2333794X19862949. eCollection 2019.
7
Systemic resilience to cross-border infectious disease threat events in Europe.欧洲跨境传染病威胁事件的系统弹性。
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2019 Sep;66(5):1855-1863. doi: 10.1111/tbed.13211. Epub 2019 May 17.
8
Fifteen years post-SARS: Key milestones in Canada's public health emergency response.非典疫情过去十五年:加拿大公共卫生应急响应中的关键里程碑。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018 May 3;44(5):98-101. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v44i05a01.
9
Visibility and transmission: complexities around promoting hand hygiene in young children - a qualitative study.可见性和传播:促进幼儿手部卫生的复杂性 - 一项定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Apr 11;19(1):398. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6729-x.
10
Recognition of aerosol transmission of infectious agents: a commentary.认识传染性病原体的气溶胶传播:评论。
BMC Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-3707-y.