Kumana C R, Ma J T, Kung A, Kou M, Lauder I
Department of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital.
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1988 Sep 5;5(3):225-31. doi: 10.1016/s0168-8227(88)80092-5.
Insulin/sulphonylurea-treated diabetics attending a busy university diabetic clinic were studied to determine whether issuing drug information sheets and/or age influenced understanding and behaviour regarding their disease and its treatment, especially with respect to avoiding hypoglycaemia. Patients were each asked 10 basic questions (each correct answer scoring 1), stratified by age (20 were less than or equal to 45 years and 91 greater than 45 years). According to a single-blind randomised protocol, they were issued or not issued with drug information sheets (providing information to correctly answer all 10 questions). After 2-3 months, 107 (88 aged greater than 45 years) were retested and asked whether they recalled an information sheet, read it themselves or had it read to them. Whether or not patients received sheets, corresponding mean aggregate scores were very similar in both age groups and there was no correlation with age. Second test scores yielded clinically and statistically significant increments in both the sheet and no sheet groups, respective mean aggregate scores increasing from 4.48 to 5.80 and 5.14 to 6.27 (P less than 0.001). Among patients issued with sheets, 32 who recalled reading them achieved the greatest improvement in mean scores (4.53 to 6.16, P less than 0.001). Active interaction/communication (participation in first test, recall and reading of information sheet) had a favourable educational impact irrespective of age, but merely issuing drug information sheets had no benefit.
对在一所繁忙的大学糖尿病诊所就诊的接受胰岛素/磺脲类药物治疗的糖尿病患者进行了研究,以确定发放药物信息单和/或年龄是否会影响他们对疾病及其治疗的理解和行为,尤其是在避免低血糖方面。每位患者被问到10个基本问题(每个正确答案得1分),并按年龄分层(20人年龄小于或等于45岁,91人年龄大于45岁)。根据单盲随机方案,他们被发放或未发放药物信息单(提供正确回答所有10个问题的信息)。2至3个月后,对107名患者(88名年龄大于45岁)进行了重新测试,并询问他们是否记得信息单、自己阅读过还是让人读给他们听过。无论患者是否收到信息单,两个年龄组的相应平均总分非常相似,且与年龄无关。第二次测试成绩在发放信息单组和未发放信息单组均产生了临床和统计学上的显著提高,各自的平均总分分别从4.48提高到5.80以及从5.14提高到6.27(P<0.001)。在收到信息单的患者中,32名记得阅读过信息单的患者平均得分提高最大(从4.53提高到6.16,P<0.001)。积极的互动/交流(参与第一次测试、记得并阅读信息单)无论年龄大小都有良好的教育影响,但仅仅发放药物信息单并无益处。