• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用电子健康记录进行人群健康管理:以血压显著升高患者为例。

Leveraging the Electronic Health Records for Population Health: A Case Study of Patients With Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure.

机构信息

Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation Yale-New Haven Hospital New Haven CT.

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Department of Internal Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT.

出版信息

J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e015033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015033. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1161/JAHA.119.015033
PMID:32200730
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7428633/
Abstract

Background The digital transformation of medical data provides opportunities to perform digital population health surveillance and identify people inadequately managed in usual care. We leveraged the electronic health records of a large health system to identify patients with markedly elevated blood pressure and characterize their follow-up care pattern. Methods and Results We included 373 861 patients aged 18 to 85 years, who had at least 1 outpatient encounter in the Yale New Haven Health System between January 2013 and December 2017. We described the prevalence and follow-up pattern of patients with at least 1 systolic blood pressure (SBP) ≥160 mm Hg or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) ≥100 mm Hg and patients with at least 1 SBP ≥180 mm Hg or DBP ≥120 mm Hg. Of 373 861 patients included, 56 909 (15.2%) had at least 1 SBP ≥160 mm Hg or DBP ≥100 mm Hg, and 10 476 (2.8%) had at least 1 SBP ≥180 mm Hg or DBP ≥120 mm Hg. Among patients with SBP ≥160 mm Hg or DBP ≥100 mm Hg, only 28.3% had a follow visit within 1 month (time window of follow-up recommended by the guideline) and 19.9% subsequently achieved control targets (SBP <130 mm Hg and DBP <80 mm Hg) within 6 months. Follow-up rate at 1 month and control rate at 6 months for patients with SBP ≥180 mm Hg or DBP ≥120 mm Hg was 31.9% and 17.2%. Conclusions Digital population health surveillance with an electronic health record identified a large number of patients with markedly elevated blood pressure and inadequate follow-up. Many of these patients subsequently failed to achieve control targets.

摘要

背景

医学数据的数字化转型为进行数字人群健康监测和识别在常规护理中管理不当的人群提供了机会。我们利用大型医疗系统的电子健康记录来识别血压明显升高的患者,并描述他们的后续护理模式。

方法和结果

我们纳入了 373861 名年龄在 18 至 85 岁之间的患者,他们在 2013 年 1 月至 2017 年 12 月期间至少在耶鲁纽黑文健康系统有一次门诊就诊。我们描述了至少有一次收缩压(SBP)≥160mmHg 或舒张压(DBP)≥100mmHg 和至少有一次 SBP≥180mmHg 或 DBP≥120mmHg 的患者的患病率和随访模式。在纳入的 373861 名患者中,有 56909 名(15.2%)至少有一次 SBP≥160mmHg 或 DBP≥100mmHg,有 10476 名(2.8%)至少有一次 SBP≥180mmHg 或 DBP≥120mmHg。在 SBP≥160mmHg 或 DBP≥100mmHg 的患者中,只有 28.3%在 1 个月内(指南推荐的随访时间窗口)进行了随访,19.9%在 6 个月内随后达到了控制目标(SBP<130mmHg 和 DBP<80mmHg)。SBP≥180mmHg 或 DBP≥120mmHg 的患者的 1 个月随访率和 6 个月控制率分别为 31.9%和 17.2%。

结论

电子健康记录的数字化人群健康监测发现了大量血压明显升高且随访不足的患者。这些患者中有许多随后未能达到控制目标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/5d99086be100/JAH3-9-e015033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/57a24a13993d/JAH3-9-e015033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/7671525c00c0/JAH3-9-e015033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/5d99086be100/JAH3-9-e015033-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/57a24a13993d/JAH3-9-e015033-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/7671525c00c0/JAH3-9-e015033-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5193/7428633/5d99086be100/JAH3-9-e015033-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Leveraging the Electronic Health Records for Population Health: A Case Study of Patients With Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure.利用电子健康记录进行人群健康管理:以血压显著升高患者为例。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Apr 7;9(7):e015033. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.015033. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Optimal Target Blood Pressure and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Low-Risk Younger Hypertensive Patients.低危年轻高血压患者的最佳目标血压与心血管疾病风险。
Am J Hypertens. 2019 Aug 14;32(9):833-841. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpz067.
3
Long-term Outcomes of the Effects of Home Blood Pressure Telemonitoring and Pharmacist Management on Blood Pressure Among Adults With Uncontrolled Hypertension: Follow-up of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.家庭血压远程监测和药师管理对血压控制不佳的成年人血压影响的长期结果:一项集群随机临床试验的随访。
JAMA Netw Open. 2018 Sep 7;1(5):e181617. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1617.
4
Effectiveness of valsartan for treatment of hypertension: patient profiling and hierarchical modeling of determinants and outcomes (the PREVIEW study).缬沙坦治疗高血压的有效性:患者特征分析及决定因素与结局的分层建模(PREVIEW研究)
Ann Pharmacother. 2009 May;43(5):849-61. doi: 10.1345/aph.1L576. Epub 2009 Apr 7.
5
Nebivolol monotherapy for patients with systolic stage II hypertension: results of a randomized, placebo-controlled trial.比索洛尔单药治疗收缩期 II 期高血压患者:一项随机、安慰剂对照试验的结果。
Clin Ther. 2013 Feb;35(2):142-52. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
6
Efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol monotherapy by baseline systolic blood pressure: a retrospective analysis of pooled data from two multicenter, 12-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, dose-ranging studies in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.根据基线收缩压评估比索洛尔单药治疗的疗效和耐受性:两项多中心、12 周、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行分组、剂量范围研究的汇总数据的回顾性分析,这些研究纳入了轻至中度原发性高血压患者。
Clin Ther. 2009 Sep;31(9):1946-56. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2009.08.028.
7
Achieved blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials.在高危患者中实现血压和心血管结局:ONTARGET 和 TRANSCEND 试验结果。
Lancet. 2017 Jun 3;389(10085):2226-2237. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30754-7. Epub 2017 Apr 5.
8
Blood pressure responses to hypertension treatment and trends in cognitive function in patients with initially difficult-to-treat hypertension: a retrospective subgroup analysis of the Observational Study on Cognitive Function and SBP Reduction (OSCAR) study.初诊难治性高血压患者降压治疗的血压反应与认知功能变化趋势:观察性认知功能与收缩压降低研究(OSCAR)的回顾性亚组分析。
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2012 Feb;14(2):78-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2011.00577.x. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
Status of Hypertension in China: Results From the China Hypertension Survey, 2012-2015.中国高血压现状:2012-2015 年中国高血压调查结果。
Circulation. 2018 May 29;137(22):2344-2356. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.032380. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
10
Efficacy and safety of two ramipril and hydrochlorothiazide fixed-dose combination formulations in adults with stage 1 or stage 2 arterial hypertension evaluated by using ABPM.使用 ABPM 评估两种雷米普利和氢氯噻嗪固定剂量复方制剂在 1 期或 2 期动脉高血压成人中的疗效和安全性。
Clin Ther. 2013 May;35(5):702-10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of clinical care classification terminology in the nursing field: A scoping review.临床护理分类术语在护理领域的应用:一项范围综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2025 May 2;8:100340. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2025.100340. eCollection 2025 Jun.
2
Navigating performance measures for ambulatory antimicrobial stewardship: a review of HEDIS® and other metrics the steward should know.门诊抗菌药物管理的绩效指标解读:对医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS®)及其他管理者应了解的指标的综述
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2024 Dec 13;4(1):e217. doi: 10.1017/ash.2024.468. eCollection 2024.
3
Using Electronic Health Records to Evaluate Treatment Gaps and Disparities in Severe Hypertension.

本文引用的文献

1
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines.2017美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会/美国医师助理学会/美国心脏病学学会/美国预防医学学院/美国老年病学会/美国药剂师协会/美国血液学会/美国预防心脏病学会/美国国家医学协会/美国初级保健医师学会成人高血压预防、检测、评估和管理指南:执行摘要:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南工作组报告
Circulation. 2018 Oct 23;138(17):e426-e483. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000597.
2
Characteristics and treatment of African-American and European-American patients with resistant hypertension identified using the electronic health record in an academic health centre: a case-control study.采用电子健康记录识别出的学术医疗中心中具有抗药性高血压的非裔美国人和欧裔美国患者的特征和治疗:一项病例对照研究。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jun 27;8(6):e021640. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-021640.
利用电子健康记录评估重度高血压的治疗差距和差异。
JACC Adv. 2024 Nov 30;4(1):101428. doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101428. eCollection 2025 Jan.
4
Use of electronic health records to characterize patients with uncontrolled hypertension in two large health system networks.利用电子健康记录描述两大医疗系统网络中未控制的高血压患者的特征。
BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024 Sep 18;24(1):497. doi: 10.1186/s12872-024-04161-x.
5
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative Study.显著高血压管理中临床医生遵循指南的障碍:定性研究。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426135. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26135.
6
Hypertension Trends and Disparities Over 12 Years in a Large Health System: Leveraging the Electronic Health Records.高血压趋势与 12 年大型医疗体系中的差异:利用电子健康记录。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 May 7;13(9):e033253. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.123.033253. Epub 2024 Apr 30.
7
The Science of Precision Prevention: Research Opportunities and Clinical Applications to Reduce Cardiovascular Health Disparities.精准预防科学:减少心血管健康差异的研究机遇与临床应用
JACC Adv. 2024 Jan;3(1). doi: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100759. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Barriers to Optimal Clinician Guideline Adherence in the Management of Markedly Elevated Blood Pressure: A Qualitative Content Analysis of Electronic Health Records.显著高血压管理中临床医生最佳遵循指南的障碍:电子健康记录的定性内容分析
medRxiv. 2024 Jan 13:2024.01.12.24301223. doi: 10.1101/2024.01.12.24301223.
9
Development of a Hypertension Electronic Phenotype for Chronic Disease Surveillance in Electronic Health Records: Key Analytic Decisions and Their Effects.开发高血压电子表型用于电子健康记录中的慢性病监测:关键分析决策及其影响。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2023 Sep 14;20:E80. doi: 10.5888/pcd20.230026.
10
Leveraging Electronic Health Records to Construct a Phenotype for Hypertension Surveillance in the United States.利用电子健康记录在美国构建高血压监测的表型。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Nov 15;36(12):677-685. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpad081.
3
Hypertension in Florida: Data From the OneFlorida Clinical Data Research Network.佛罗里达州的高血压:来自 OneFlorida 临床数据研究网络的数据。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Mar 1;15:E27. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170332.
4
Telemedicine and M-Health in Hypertension Management: Technologies, Applications and Clinical Evidence.远程医疗与移动健康在高血压管理中的应用:技术、应用及临床证据
High Blood Press Cardiovasc Prev. 2016 Sep;23(3):187-96. doi: 10.1007/s40292-016-0143-6. Epub 2016 Apr 12.
5
The Kaiser Permanente Northern California Story: Improving Hypertension Control From 44% to 90% in 13 Years (2000 to 2013).北加利福尼亚凯撒医疗集团的故事:13年(2000年至2013年)间将高血压控制率从44%提高到90%
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2016 Apr;18(4):260-1. doi: 10.1111/jch.12803. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
6
Using Electronic Health Records for Population Health Research: A Review of Methods and Applications.利用电子健康记录进行人群健康研究:方法与应用综述。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2016;37:61-81. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032315-021353. Epub 2015 Dec 11.
7
Patient navigators for people with chronic disease: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.慢性病患者的患者导航员:系统评价与荟萃分析方案
Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 14;4:28. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0019-1.
8
Screening for High Blood Pressure in Adults During Ambulatory Nonprimary Care Visits: Opportunities to Improve Hypertension Recognition.门诊非初级保健就诊期间成人高血压筛查:改善高血压识别的机会
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2015 Jun;17(6):431-9. doi: 10.1111/jch.12517. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
9
Systemic implementation strategies to improve hypertension: the Kaiser Permanente Southern California experience.系统实施策略以改善高血压:凯撒永久南加州经验。
Can J Cardiol. 2014 May;30(5):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2014.01.003. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
10
Patient and healthcare provider barriers to hypertension awareness, treatment and follow up: a systematic review and meta-analysis of qualitative and quantitative studies.患者及医疗服务提供者在高血压认知、治疗和随访方面的障碍:定性和定量研究的系统评价与荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2014 Jan 15;9(1):e84238. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084238. eCollection 2014.