• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

A-LED 先导研究增加拉丁裔的结直肠癌筛查:该计划。

A -Led Pilot Study to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Latinos: The Program.

机构信息

San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, USA.

University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

Health Promot Pract. 2021 Jul;22(4):491-501. doi: 10.1177/1524839920912240. Epub 2020 Mar 22.

DOI:10.1177/1524839920912240
PMID:32202155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8364826/
Abstract

Latinos have lower colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates compared to other racial/ethnic groups in the United States, despite an overall increase in CRC screening over the past 10 years. To address this disparity, we implemented a -led intervention to increase CRC screening test adherence in community-based settings, connecting community members with a partnering federally qualified health center. . To evaluate the /Together Against Cancer (JUNTOS) intervention, by assessing pre-post changes in (1) CRC screening test adherence and (2) CRC knowledge and perceived barriers to CRC screening. We also assessed the feasibility and acceptability of program activities. . JUNTOS was a group-based intervention, delivered by promotores (community health workers), to promote CRC screening test adherence among Latino adults. The intervention consisted of a culturally tailored 2½-hour interactive workshop followed by an appointment scheduling assistance from a promotor. Workshop participants were Latino adults (males and females) aged 50 to 75 years who were not up-to-date with CRC screening guidelines. We conducted interviews before and 6 to 9 months after the workshop to assess program outcomes. . Of the 177 participants included, 118 reported completing the CRC screening test (66.7%) by 6 to 9 months postintervention. We observed baseline to 6- to 9-month increase in CRC knowledge and lower perceived barriers to obtaining CRC screening. Furthermore, the intervention was found to be feasible and acceptable. . Results suggest that JUNTOS can be feasibly implemented in partnership with a federally qualified health center. The current study supports group-based CRC interventions in community and clinic settings.

摘要

拉丁裔美国人的结直肠癌 (CRC) 筛查率低于美国其他种族/族裔群体,尽管在过去 10 年中 CRC 筛查总体有所增加。为了解决这一差异,我们实施了一项以领导人为基础的干预措施,以增加社区环境中 CRC 筛查测试的依从性,将社区成员与合作的联邦合格健康中心联系起来。为了评估/一起对抗癌症(JUNTOS)干预措施,我们评估了(1)CRC 筛查测试依从性和(2)CRC 知识和对 CRC 筛查障碍的感知变化。我们还评估了计划活动的可行性和可接受性。JUNTOS 是一种基于群体的干预措施,由 promotores(社区卫生工作者)提供,以促进拉丁裔成年人对 CRC 筛查测试的依从性。该干预措施包括一个文化上量身定制的 2 个半小时的互动研讨会,然后由 promotor 提供预约安排协助。研讨会参与者是年龄在 50 至 75 岁之间的拉丁裔成年人(男性和女性),他们不符合 CRC 筛查指南的要求。我们在研讨会前和 6 至 9 个月后进行了访谈,以评估项目结果。在 177 名参与者中,有 118 名报告在干预后 6 至 9 个月内完成了 CRC 筛查测试(66.7%)。我们观察到 CRC 知识从基线到 6 至 9 个月有所增加,并且获得 CRC 筛查的感知障碍降低。此外,该干预措施被认为是可行且可接受的。结果表明,JUNTOS 可以与联邦合格健康中心合作进行可行性实施。目前的研究支持社区和诊所环境中的基于群体的 CRC 干预措施。

相似文献

1
A -Led Pilot Study to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening in Latinos: The Program.A-LED 先导研究增加拉丁裔的结直肠癌筛查:该计划。
Health Promot Pract. 2021 Jul;22(4):491-501. doi: 10.1177/1524839920912240. Epub 2020 Mar 22.
2
Development of a Group-Based Community Health Worker Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos.基于群体的社区卫生工作者干预措施的制定,以增加拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌筛查率。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2021 Mar;19(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1540415320923564. Epub 2020 May 29.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening in health centers: a qualitative study of key informant perspectives.在健康中心实施多层次、多组分干预措施以促进结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:关键知情人观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10749-y.
4
A culturally and linguistically salient pilot intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening among Latinos receiving care in a Federally Qualified Health Center.在一家联邦合格健康中心接受治疗的拉丁裔人群中,开展具有文化和语言针对性的试点干预,以促进结直肠癌筛查。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Jun 1;34(3):310-320. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz010.
5
Evaluating Two Evidence-Based Intervention Strategies to Promote CRC Screening Among Latino Adults in a Primary Care Setting.评估两种循证干预策略,以在初级保健环境中促进拉丁裔成年人的 CRC 筛查。
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2018 Jun;5(3):530-535. doi: 10.1007/s40615-017-0395-4. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
6
Cross-sectional Study of Colorectal Cancer Screening Barriers in a Latino-Serving Federally Qualified Health Center.拉丁裔联邦合格健康中心结直肠癌筛查障碍的横断面研究
J Cancer Educ. 2023 Feb;38(1):193-200. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02097-w. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
7
A culturally tailored navigator program for colorectal cancer screening in a community health center: a randomized, controlled trial.社区卫生中心针对结直肠癌筛查的文化定制导航计划:一项随机对照试验。
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Feb;24(2):211-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0864-x.
8
Colorectal cancer knowledge and screening adherence among low-income Hispanic employees.低收入西班牙裔员工的结直肠癌知识和筛查依从性。
Health Educ Res. 2019 Aug 1;34(4):400-414. doi: 10.1093/her/cyz013.
9
Comparing Latino Community Members' and Clinical Staff's Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Colorectal Cancer Screening.比较拉丁裔社区成员和临床工作人员对结直肠癌筛查障碍和促进因素的观点。
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Dec;37(6):1645-1653. doi: 10.1007/s13187-021-02007-0. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
10
The Effectiveness of a Physician-Only and Physician-Patient Intervention on Colorectal Cancer Screening Discussions Between Providers and African American and Latino Patients.仅医生参与及医生-患者共同参与的干预措施对医疗服务提供者与非裔美国人和拉丁裔患者之间结直肠癌筛查讨论的有效性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Dec;30(12):1780-7. doi: 10.1007/s11606-015-3381-8. Epub 2015 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Improving animated instructional videos for colorectal cancer screening: An application of learner verification and revision.改进结直肠癌筛查的动画教学视频:学习者验证与修订的应用
Transl Behav Med. 2025 Jan 16;15(1). doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibaf020.
2
Effect of a Theory-Based Narrative Video on Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention, Knowledge, and Psychosocial Variables Among a Predominantly Hispanic Population.基于理论的叙事视频对以西班牙裔为主的人群的结直肠癌筛查意愿、知识和心理社会变量的影响。
J Cancer Educ. 2024 Oct;39(5):578-584. doi: 10.1007/s13187-024-02442-9. Epub 2024 May 22.
3
Barriers and facilitators to implementing a multilevel, multicomponent intervention promoting colorectal cancer screening in health centers: a qualitative study of key informant perspectives.

本文引用的文献

1
A Cancer Education-Plus-Navigation Intervention Implemented Within a Federally Qualified Health Center and Community-Based Settings.在一个联邦合格健康中心和社区环境中实施的癌症教育加导航干预。
J Cancer Educ. 2021 Feb;36(1):152-159. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01611-5.
2
Patients' self-reported barriers to colon cancer screening in federally qualified health center settings.联邦合格医疗中心环境下患者自我报告的结肠癌筛查障碍。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 May 15;15:100896. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100896. eCollection 2019 Sep.
3
Cancer Statistics for Hispanics/Latinos, 2018.
在健康中心实施多层次、多组分干预措施以促进结直肠癌筛查的障碍和促进因素:关键知情人观点的定性研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Mar 29;24(1):404. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-10749-y.
4
Construction of a prognostic model of colon cancer patients based on metabolism-related lncRNAs.基于代谢相关长链非编码RNA构建结肠癌患者预后模型
Front Oncol. 2022 Sep 29;12:944476. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.944476. eCollection 2022.
5
Network Pharmacology-Based Analysis of the Potential Biological Mechanisms of Coix Seed against Colorectal Cancer.基于网络药理学的薏苡仁抗结直肠癌潜在生物学机制分析
Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022 Oct 6;2022:9261768. doi: 10.1155/2022/9261768. eCollection 2022.
6
Design, implementation, and evaluation of community health worker training programs in Latinx communities: A scoping review.拉裔社区社区卫生工作者培训计划的设计、实施和评估:范围综述。
J Community Psychol. 2023 Jan;51(1):382-405. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22910. Epub 2022 Jun 18.
7
Saving a seat at the table for community members: co-creating an attachment-based intervention for low-income Latinx parent-youth dyads using a promotor/a model.为社区成员在决策过程中保留一席之地:采用促进者模式,共同为低收入拉丁裔亲子二元组创建基于依恋关系的干预措施。
Res Psychother. 2022 Feb 4;25(1):598. doi: 10.4081/ripppo.2022.598.
8
Colorectal cancer screening in Uruguay: current assessment and roadmap for the future.乌拉圭的结直肠癌筛查:当前评估与未来路线图。
Psicol Reflex Crit. 2021 Jun 29;34(1):20. doi: 10.1186/s41155-021-00178-9.
9
Development of a Group-Based Community Health Worker Intervention to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Latinos.基于群体的社区卫生工作者干预措施的制定,以增加拉丁裔人群的结直肠癌筛查率。
Hisp Health Care Int. 2021 Mar;19(1):47-54. doi: 10.1177/1540415320923564. Epub 2020 May 29.
2018 年西班牙裔/拉丁裔癌症统计数据。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Nov;68(6):425-445. doi: 10.3322/caac.21494. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
4
Colorectal cancer screening use among insured adults: Is out-of-pocket cost a barrier to routine screening?参保成年人的结直肠癌筛查情况:自付费用是常规筛查的障碍吗?
World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep 5;9(4):31-38. doi: 10.4292/wjgpt.v9.i4.31.
5
Patterns and Trends in Cancer Screening in the United States.美国癌症筛查的模式和趋势。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Jul 26;15:E97. doi: 10.5888/pcd15.170465.
6
A systematic review of clinic and community intervention to increase fecal testing for colorectal cancer in rural and low-income populations in the United States - How, what and when?美国农村和低收入人群结直肠癌粪便检测的临床和社区干预的系统评价 - 如何、什么和何时?
BMC Cancer. 2018 Jan 6;18(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3813-4.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Community Interventions for Colorectal Cancer Screening: Low-Income Hispanic Population.社区结直肠癌筛查干预措施的成本效益:低收入西班牙裔人群
Health Promot Pract. 2018 Nov;19(6):863-872. doi: 10.1177/1524839917750815. Epub 2017 Dec 31.
8
Evaluation of a Promotora-led Intervention on Colorectal Cancer among Hispanics: Findings related to Perceptions and Communications.对一名促进者主导的针对西班牙裔人群结直肠癌干预措施的评估:与认知和沟通相关的结果
Calif J Health Promot. 2013 Sep;11(2):21-31.
9
Patient Navigation for Colonoscopy Completion: Results of an RCT.结肠镜检查完成的患者导航:一项 RCT 的结果。
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):363-372. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.05.010. Epub 2017 Jul 1.
10
Promoting cancer screening among churchgoing Latinas: Fe en Acción/faith in action.在常去教堂做礼拜的拉丁裔女性中推广癌症筛查:“信仰行动”(Fe en Acción/faith in action)。
Health Educ Res. 2017 Apr 1;32(2):163-173. doi: 10.1093/her/cyx033.