Department of Hematology, St. Luke's International Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Division of Hematology, Department of Internal Medicine, Aichi Medical University Hospital, Aichi, Japan.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2020 Oct;55(10):1955-1965. doi: 10.1038/s41409-020-0856-y. Epub 2020 Mar 12.
Reduced-intensity conditioning (RIC) has been facilitating allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for patients originally considered ineligible for HCT with myeloablative conditioning. Fludarabine (Flu) with reduced doses of busulfan (Bu) (Flu + Bu) and Flu with reduced doses of melphalan (Mel) (Flu + Mel) are widely used RIC regimens for acute myeloid leukemia (AML). A nationwide retrospective study comparing clinical outcomes of adult patients with AML receiving first allo-HCT after RIC between 2001 and 2010 was performed. Cumulative incidences of relapse were not significantly different among the Flu + ivBu-based (FBiv), Flu + poBu-based (FBpo), and Flu + Mel-based (FM) groups (p = 0.29). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was significantly lower in patients receiving FBiv compared with FBpo (p = 0.003) and FM (p < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, there was no significant difference in overall survival, but FM was associated with a significantly lower risk of relapse (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.85, p = 0.002), higher NRM (HR = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.10-2.33, p = 0.013) and better leukemia-free survival (HR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63-0.95, p = 0.015) compared with FBiv. These results suggest that Flu + Mel has a more intense disease control potential and Flu + ivBu is less toxic than the other. Both RIC regimens provide similar survival outcomes and are effective and useful regimens for patients with AML who received allo-HCT.
对于原本不符合清髓性预处理条件而不能进行造血细胞移植(HCT)的患者,降低强度预处理(RIC)已促进异基因造血细胞移植(allo-HCT)的开展。氟达拉滨(Flu)联合小剂量白消安(Bu)(Flu+Bui)和氟达拉滨联合小剂量马法兰(Mel)(Flu+Mel)是广泛应用于急性髓系白血病(AML)的 RIC 方案。本研究开展了一项回顾性全国性研究,比较了 2001 年至 2010 年期间接受 RIC 后首次 allo-HCT 的 AML 成年患者的临床结局。Flu+Bui 组(FBiv)、Flu+poBu 组(FBpo)和 Flu+Mel 组(FM)的复发累积发生率无显著差异(p=0.29)。与 FBpo 组(p=0.003)和 FM 组(p<0.001)相比,FBiv 组的非复发死亡率(NRM)显著降低。多变量分析显示,总生存无显著差异,但 FM 组的复发风险显著降低(风险比(HR)=0.65,95%置信区间(CI):0.50-0.85,p=0.002),NRM 更高(HR=1.60,95% CI:1.10-2.33,p=0.013),白血病无复发生存(HR=0.77,95% CI:0.63-0.95,p=0.015)更好。这些结果表明,Flu+Mel 具有更强的疾病控制潜力,而 Flu+ivBu 比其他方案毒性更小。两种 RIC 方案的生存结局相似,是接受 allo-HCT 的 AML 患者的有效且有用的方案。