School of Nursing, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA, United States of America.
School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States of America.
J Prof Nurs. 2020 Mar-Apr;36(2):77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2019.08.003. Epub 2019 Aug 15.
This paper highlights questions about Canadian nurse regulators' adoption of the U.S.-based NCLEX-RN examination, effective 2015, as the only route to initial registered nurse licensure in all jurisdictions, excluding Quebec. The decision for this change was made by the Canadian Council of Registered Nurses Regulators (CCRNR), an umbrella association of CEO's of provincial regulatory bodies in collaboration with the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN). Adoption and implementation of this new policy was accomplished by the Council of each provincial regulatory body. This change, representing the first international adoption of NCLEX-RN, was deemed successful by CCRNR and NCSBN. However, the Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing (CASN) described the decision as unilateral and unwise, questioning the applicability of NCLEX-RN in the Canadian context, citing significant French language translation issues and unacceptable pass rates. Both authors have had extensive academic nursing experience in U.S. and Canada. Both had many conversations with Canadian colleagues who described the impact on nursing education as disastrous. Most of our American colleagues knew nothing about this change, but once informed, expressed some concerns similar to those of their Canadian counterparts. We suggest that international adoption of a US-based examination for initial licensure merits wider discussion by nursing faculty here and abroad.
本文重点探讨了加拿大护士监管机构自 2015 年起采用基于美国的 NCLEX-RN 考试作为所有司法管辖区(魁北克除外)初始注册护士执照的唯一途径这一问题。这一变化的决定是由加拿大注册护士监管机构理事会(CCRNR)做出的,该理事会是省级监管机构首席执行官的伞式协会,与美国国家州立董事会护理委员会(NCSBN)合作。这一政策的采用和实施是由每个省级监管机构的理事会完成的。这一变化代表了 NCLEX-RN 的首次国际采用,被 CCRNR 和 NCSBN 认为是成功的。然而,加拿大护理学院协会(CASN)将这一决定描述为单方面的和不明智的,质疑 NCLEX-RN 在加拿大背景下的适用性,引用了重大的法语翻译问题和不可接受的通过率。两位作者都在美国和加拿大有丰富的学术护理经验。他们与许多加拿大同事进行了交谈,这些同事描述了这对护理教育的灾难性影响。我们的大多数美国同事对此一无所知,但一旦得知,他们就表达了一些与加拿大同行类似的担忧。我们建议,国际上采用基于美国的考试作为初始许可,值得这里和国外的护理教师进行更广泛的讨论。