• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术合格的外科医生对腹腔镜结直肠切除术结果的影响:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。

Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis.

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery I, Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo.

Department of Surgery, Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital, Sapporo.

出版信息

BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):486-498. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50263. Epub 2020 Mar 24.

DOI:10.1002/bjs5.50263
PMID:32207580
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7260420/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS) was introduced in Japan to improve the quality of laparoscopic surgery. This cohort study investigated the short- and long-term postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer laparoscopic procedures performed by or with qualified surgeons compared with outcomes for unqualified surgeons.

METHODS

All laparoscopic colorectal resections performed from 2010 to 2013 in 11 Japanese hospitals were reviewed retrospectively. The procedures were categorized as performed by surgeons with or without the ESSQS qualification and patients' clinical, pathological and surgical features were used to match subgroups using propensity scoring. Outcome measures included postoperative and long-term results.

RESULTS

Overall, 1428 procedures were analysed; 586 procedures were performed with ESSQS-qualified surgeons and 842 were done by ESSQS-unqualified surgeons. Upon matching, two cohorts of 426 patients were selected for comparison of short-term results. A prevalence of rectal resection (50·3 versus 40·5 per cent; P < 0·001) and shorter duration of surgery (230 versus 238 min; P = 0·045) was reported for the ESSQS group. Intraoperative and postoperative complication and reoperation rates were significantly lower in the ESSQS group than in the non-ESSQS group (1·2 versus 3·6 per cent, P = 0·014; 4·6 versus 7·5 per cent, P = 0·025; 1·9 versus 3·9 per cent, P = 0·023, respectively). These findings were confirmed after propensity score matching. Cox regression analysis found that non-attendance of ESSQS-qualified surgeons (hazard ratio 12·30, 95 per cent c.i. 1·28 to 119·10; P = 0·038) was independently associated with local recurrence in patients with stage II disease.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic colorectal procedures performed with ESSQS-qualified surgeons showed improved postoperative results. Further studies are needed to investigate the impact of the qualification on long-term oncological outcomes.

摘要

背景

内镜手术技能资格认证系统(ESSQS)在日本引入,旨在提高腹腔镜手术的质量。本队列研究调查了由合格外科医生或与合格外科医生合作进行的结直肠腹腔镜手术与不合格外科医生进行的手术的短期和长期术后结果。

方法

回顾性分析了 2010 年至 2013 年在日本 11 家医院进行的所有腹腔镜结直肠切除术。根据外科医生是否具有 ESSQS 资格对手术进行分类,并使用倾向评分匹配患者的临床、病理和手术特征的亚组。观察指标包括术后和长期结果。

结果

共分析了 1428 例手术;586 例手术由具有 ESSQS 资质的外科医生完成,842 例手术由 ESSQS 不合格的外科医生完成。匹配后,选择了两组 426 例患者进行短期结果比较。ESSQS 组直肠切除术(50.3%比 40.5%;P<0.001)和手术时间更短(230 分钟比 238 分钟;P=0.045)。ESSQS 组术中及术后并发症和再次手术率明显低于非 ESSQS 组(1.2%比 3.6%,P=0.014;4.6%比 7.5%,P=0.025;1.9%比 3.9%,P=0.023)。这些发现在倾向评分匹配后得到了证实。Cox 回归分析发现,Ⅱ期疾病患者中,非 ESSQS 合格外科医生(危险比 12.30,95%可信区间 1.28 至 119.10;P=0.038)是局部复发的独立相关因素。

结论

由具有 ESSQS 资质的外科医生进行的腹腔镜结直肠手术术后结果改善。需要进一步研究该资质对长期肿瘤学结果的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/ae4ba03777a4/BJS5-4-486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/88d26b858677/BJS5-4-486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/2053926c2740/BJS5-4-486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/dfdfdf5b1e57/BJS5-4-486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/ae4ba03777a4/BJS5-4-486-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/88d26b858677/BJS5-4-486-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/2053926c2740/BJS5-4-486-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/dfdfdf5b1e57/BJS5-4-486-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/26d3/7260420/ae4ba03777a4/BJS5-4-486-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis.技术合格的外科医生对腹腔镜结直肠切除术结果的影响:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):486-498. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50263. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
2
Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: short-term outcomes: a single-center and retrospective analysis.内镜手术技能资格认证系统在腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的应用价值:短期疗效:单中心回顾性分析
BMC Surg. 2019 Jul 11;19(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12893-019-0528-2.
3
Impact of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system on the oncological safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center retrospective cohort study.内镜手术技能资质体系对腹腔镜胃癌根治术肿瘤安全性的影响:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Oct;38(10):5693-5703. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11153-7. Epub 2024 Aug 12.
4
The usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy: a single-center, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.内镜手术技能资格认证系统在腹腔镜右半结肠切除术的应用:单中心回顾性分析及倾向评分匹配研究。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jan 16;408(1):33. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-02810-x.
5
Impact of the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System on the safety of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.内镜外科技能资格认证系统对胃癌腹腔镜胃切除术安全性的影响。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Nov;35(11):6089-6100. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08102-5. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
6
Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic multivisceral resection: Japanese multicenter analysis.腹腔镜多脏器切除内镜手术技能资格认定系统的效果:日本多中心分析
Surg Endosc. 2022 May;36(5):3068-3075. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08605-9. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
7
Impact of Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification on Laparoscopic Resections for Rectal Cancer in Japan: The EnSSURE Study.日本内镜外科技能资质对直肠癌腹腔镜切除术的影响:EnSSURE研究
Ann Surg Open. 2022 Apr 22;3(2):e160. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000160. eCollection 2022 Jun.
8
Usefulness of the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic colectomy for transverse colon cancer: a Japanese multicenter analysis.日本多中心分析:内镜手术技能资格系统在横结肠癌腹腔镜结肠切除术的应用。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Jul 10;408(1):271. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03008-x.
9
Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System: propensity-score matched cohort analysis of accredited supervisors in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery.内镜手术技能资格认证系统:腹腔镜直肠癌手术认证导师的倾向评分匹配队列分析。
Br J Surg. 2023 Nov 9;110(12):1834-1839. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad282.
10
Does the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System improve patients' outcome following laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer? A multicentre, retrospective analysis with propensity score matching.内镜外科技能资格认证系统能否改善结肠癌腹腔镜手术后的患者预后?一项采用倾向评分匹配的多中心回顾性分析。
World J Surg Oncol. 2021 Feb 19;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12957-021-02155-z.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic surgical skill assessment using a task classification model in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.使用任务分类模型对腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术进行自动手术技能评估。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12036-1.
2
Real-time automatic detection of gynecological laparoscopic surgical instruments and exploration in surgical skills assessment application: a cross-sectional study.实时自动检测妇科腹腔镜手术器械及其在手术技能评估应用中的探索:一项横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Sep 1;111(9):5882-5892. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002699. Epub 2025 Jun 12.
3
Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic conversion in colorectal cancer surgery; is there any improvement over time at a population level?腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中转:在人群水平上是否随着时间的推移而有所改善?
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jul;32(7):3234-3246. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6042-2. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
2
Mentor Tutoring: An Efficient Method for Teaching Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Skills in a General Hospital.导师辅导:综合医院中教授腹腔镜结直肠手术技能的有效方法。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Dec;27(6):479-484. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000487.
3
The Balance Between Surgical Resident Education and Patient Safety in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Surgical Resident's Performance has No Negative Impact.
腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中组织解剖效率的人工智能评估
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 22;410(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8.
4
Risk factors for anastomotic leakage in rectal cancer surgery reflecting current practices.反映当前实践情况的直肠癌手术吻合口漏的危险因素。
Surg Today. 2025 Jan 11. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02988-7.
5
Artificial intelligence-enhanced navigation for nerve recognition and surgical education in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.人工智能增强导航在腹腔镜结直肠手术中的神经识别与手术教育应用
Surg Endosc. 2025 Feb;39(2):1388-1396. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11489-0. Epub 2025 Jan 6.
6
Effect of endoscopic surgical skill qualification system for laparoscopic rectal surgery: Japanese multicenter analysis.腹腔镜直肠手术的内镜手术技能资格认定系统的效果:日本多中心分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Jan;39(1):394-400. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11407-4. Epub 2024 Nov 19.
7
Automated surgical skill assessment in colorectal surgery using a deep learning-based surgical phase recognition model.基于深度学习的手术阶段识别模型在结直肠手术中自动进行手术技能评估。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6347-6355. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11208-9. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
8
C-reactive protein-to-albumin ratio as a risk factor for anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer with intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence imaging.C 反应蛋白-白蛋白比值作为术中应用吲哚菁绿荧光成像行直肠前切除术治疗直肠癌后吻合口漏的危险因素。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Aug;38(8):4236-4244. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10940-6. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
9
Development of a laparoscopic sigmoidectomy simulator: Sigmaster.腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术模拟器的研制:Sigmaster。
Surg Today. 2024 Oct;54(10):1272-1276. doi: 10.1007/s00595-024-02855-5. Epub 2024 May 14.
10
Evaluation of the advantage of surgeons certified by the endoscopic surgical skill qualification system participating in laparoscopic low anterior rectal resection.评估通过内镜手术技能资格系统认证的外科医生参与腹腔镜低位前切除术的优势。
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2023 Dec 14;8(3):464-470. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12763. eCollection 2024 May.
腹腔镜结直肠手术中外科住院医师教育与患者安全之间的平衡:外科住院医师的表现无负面影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2017 Aug;27(4):295-300. doi: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000426.
4
Supervision by a technically qualified surgeon affects the proficiency and safety of laparoscopic colectomy performed by novice surgeons.技术合格的外科医生的监督影响新手外科医生进行腹腔镜结直肠切除术的熟练程度和安全性。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Jan;32(1):436-442. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5701-z. Epub 2017 Jun 29.
5
Survival outcomes following laparoscopic versus open D3 dissection for stage II or III colon cancer (JCOG0404): a phase 3, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹 D3 解剖治疗 II 期或 III 期结肠癌的生存结局(JCOG0404):一项 III 期随机对照临床试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Apr;2(4):261-268. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30207-2. Epub 2017 Feb 2.
6
Impact of surgeon laparoscopic training and case volume of laparoscopic surgery on conversion during elective laparoscopic colorectal surgery.外科医生腹腔镜培训及腹腔镜手术病例量对择期腹腔镜结直肠手术中转率的影响。
Colorectal Dis. 2017 Jan;19(1):76-85. doi: 10.1111/codi.13402.
7
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection on Pathological Outcomes in Rectal Cancer: The ALaCaRT Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助与开放手术切除直肠癌对病理结局的影响:ALA-CART 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1356-63. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.12009.
8
Effect of Laparoscopic-Assisted Resection vs Open Resection of Stage II or III Rectal Cancer on Pathologic Outcomes: The ACOSOG Z6051 Randomized Clinical Trial.腹腔镜辅助切除术与开放性切除术治疗Ⅱ期或Ⅲ期直肠癌对病理结果的影响:美国外科医师学会肿瘤学组Z6051随机临床试验
JAMA. 2015 Oct 6;314(13):1346-55. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.10529.
9
A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗直肠癌的随机对照研究。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 2;372(14):1324-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414882.
10
Mortality after common rectal surgery in Japan: a study on low anterior resection from a newly established nationwide large-scale clinical database.日本常见直肠手术后的死亡率:一项基于新建立的全国性大规模临床数据库的低位前切除术研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Sep;57(9):1075-81. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000176.