• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中组织解剖效率的人工智能评估

Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

作者信息

Nakajima Kei, Takenaka Shin, Kitaguchi Daichi, Tanaka Atsuki, Ryu Kyoko, Takeshita Nobuyoshi, Kinugasa Yusuke, Ito Masaaki

机构信息

Surgical Device Innovation Office, National Cancer Center Hospital East, 6-5-1 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8577, Japan.

Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, 1-5-45, Yushima, Bunkyo-Ku, Tokyo, 113-8510, Japan.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 22;410(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8
PMID:39984705
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11845557/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Several surgical-skill assessment tools emphasize the importance of efficient tissue-dissection, whose assessment relies on human judgment and is thus subject to bias. Automated assessment may help solve this problem. This study aimed to verify the feasibility of surgical-skill assessment using a deep learning-based recognition model.

METHODS

This retrospective study used multicenter intraoperative videos of laparoscopic colorectal surgery (sigmoidectomy or high anterior resection) for colorectal cancer obtained from 766 cases across Japan. Three groups with different skill levels were distinguished: high-, intermediate-, and low-skill. We developed a model to recognize tissue dissection by the monopolar device using deep learning-based computer-vision technology. Tissue-dissection time per monopolar device appearance time (efficient-dissection time ratio) was extracted as a quantitative parameter describing efficient dissection. We automatically measured the efficient-dissection time ratio using the recognition model of 8 surgical instruments and tissue-dissection on/off classification model. The efficient-dissection time ratio was compared among groups; the feasibility of distinguishing them was explored using the model. The model-calculated parameters were evaluated to determine whether they could differentiate high-, intermediate-, and low-skill groups.

RESULTS

The tissue-dissection recognition model had an overall accuracy of 0.91. There was a moderate correlation (0.542; 95% confidence interval, 0.288-0.724; P < 0.001) between manually and automatically measured efficient-dissection time ratios. Efficient-dissection time ratios by this model were significantly higher in the high-skill than in intermediate-skill (P = 0.0081) and low-skill (P = 0.0249) groups.

CONCLUSION

An automated efficient-dissection assessment model using a monopolar device was constructed with a feasible automated skill-assessment method.

摘要

目的

几种手术技能评估工具强调了高效组织解剖的重要性,其评估依赖于人为判断,因此容易产生偏差。自动评估可能有助于解决这一问题。本研究旨在验证使用基于深度学习的识别模型进行手术技能评估的可行性。

方法

这项回顾性研究使用了从日本各地766例结肠癌腹腔镜结直肠手术(乙状结肠切除术或高位前切除术)中获取的多中心术中视频。区分了三组不同技能水平的人群:高技能、中等技能和低技能。我们使用基于深度学习的计算机视觉技术开发了一个模型,用于识别单极设备的组织解剖情况。将每个单极设备出现时间的组织解剖时间(高效解剖时间比)提取为描述高效解剖的定量参数。我们使用8种手术器械的识别模型和组织解剖开/关分类模型自动测量高效解剖时间比。比较了各组之间的高效解剖时间比;使用该模型探索区分它们的可行性。对模型计算的参数进行评估,以确定它们是否能够区分高技能、中等技能和低技能组。

结果

组织解剖识别模型的总体准确率为0.91。手动测量和自动测量的高效解剖时间比之间存在中等程度的相关性(0.542;95%置信区间,0.288 - 0.724;P < 0.001)。该模型得出的高技能组的高效解剖时间比显著高于中等技能组(P = 0.0081)和低技能组(P = 0.0249)。

结论

构建了一种使用单极设备的自动高效解剖评估模型,并采用了可行的自动技能评估方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/67bd9ce6ad20/423_2025_3641_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/f31aa91968c8/423_2025_3641_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/3269d2e49ce4/423_2025_3641_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/d203b2fe714e/423_2025_3641_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/67bd9ce6ad20/423_2025_3641_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/f31aa91968c8/423_2025_3641_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/3269d2e49ce4/423_2025_3641_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/d203b2fe714e/423_2025_3641_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f2a3/11845557/67bd9ce6ad20/423_2025_3641_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Artificial intelligence assessment of tissue-dissection efficiency in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中组织解剖效率的人工智能评估
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2025 Feb 22;410(1):80. doi: 10.1007/s00423-025-03641-8.
2
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.腹腔镜手术治疗结直肠癌的临床疗效与成本效益:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450.
3
Developing a deep learning-based surgical-skill assessment model focused on instrument handling in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.开发一种基于深度学习的手术技能评估模型,重点关注腹腔镜结直肠癌手术中的器械操作。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 17;51(9):110260. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110260.
4
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
6
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
7
AI-based Hepatic Steatosis Detection and Integrated Hepatic Assessment from Cardiac CT Attenuation Scans Enhances All-cause Mortality Risk Stratification: A Multi-center Study.基于人工智能的心脏CT衰减扫描检测肝脂肪变性及综合肝脏评估可增强全因死亡风险分层:一项多中心研究
medRxiv. 2025 Jun 11:2025.06.09.25329157. doi: 10.1101/2025.06.09.25329157.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
10
Systemic treatments for metastatic cutaneous melanoma.转移性皮肤黑色素瘤的全身治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 6;2(2):CD011123. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011123.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Automatic surgical skill assessment using a task classification model in laparoscopic sigmoidectomy.使用任务分类模型对腹腔镜乙状结肠切除术进行自动手术技能评估。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Aug 8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-025-12036-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Automated surgical skill assessment in colorectal surgery using a deep learning-based surgical phase recognition model.基于深度学习的手术阶段识别模型在结直肠手术中自动进行手术技能评估。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Nov;38(11):6347-6355. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11208-9. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
2
Machine learning-based Automatic Evaluation of Tissue Handling Skills in Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: A Retrospective Experimental Study.基于机器学习的腹腔镜结直肠癌手术组织处理技能自动评估:一项回顾性实验研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Aug 1;278(2):e250-e255. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005731. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
3
Development and Validation of a Model for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgical Instrument Recognition Using Convolutional Neural Network-Based Instance Segmentation and Videos of Laparoscopic Procedures.
基于卷积神经网络实例分割和腹腔镜手术视频的腹腔镜结直肠手术器械识别模型的开发和验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Aug 1;5(8):e2226265. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26265.
4
Automation of surgical skill assessment using a three-stage machine learning algorithm.使用三阶段机器学习算法实现手术技能评估自动化。
Sci Rep. 2021 Mar 4;11(1):5197. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84295-6.
5
SAGES Video-Based Assessment (VBA) program: a vision for life-long learning for surgeons.SAGES基于视频的评估(VBA)项目:外科医生终身学习的愿景。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Aug;34(8):3285-3288. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07628-y. Epub 2020 May 15.
6
Association of Surgical Skill Assessment With Clinical Outcomes in Cancer Surgery.手术技能评估与癌症手术临床结果的关联。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Jul 1;155(7):590-598. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.1004.
7
Impact of technically qualified surgeons on laparoscopic colorectal resection outcomes: results of a propensity score-matching analysis.技术合格的外科医生对腹腔镜结直肠切除术结果的影响:倾向评分匹配分析的结果。
BJS Open. 2020 Jun;4(3):486-498. doi: 10.1002/bjs5.50263. Epub 2020 Mar 24.
8
Clinical validity of consultant technical skills assessment in the English National Training Programme for Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery.英国国家腹腔镜结直肠外科培训计划中顾问技术技能评估的临床有效性。
Br J Surg. 2015 Jul;102(8):991-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9828. Epub 2015 May 21.
9
Force-Sensing Enhanced Simulation Environment (ForSense) for laparoscopic surgery training and assessment.用于腹腔镜手术训练与评估的力感增强模拟环境(ForSense)
Surgery. 2015 Apr;157(4):723-31. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.015. Epub 2015 Feb 24.
10
World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.《世界医学协会赫尔辛基宣言:涉及人类受试者的医学研究伦理原则》
JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053.