Chen Xiaosheng, Reed Phil
Swansea University, UK.
Swansea University, UK.
Behav Processes. 2020 Jun;175:104106. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104106. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
Two experiments examined factors controlling human free-operant performance in relation to predictions based on the nature of bout-initiation and within-bout responding. Overall, responding was higher for a random ratio (RR) than a random interval (RI) schedule, with equal rates of reinforcement. Bout-initiation rates were not different across the two schedules, but within-bout rates were higher on the RR schedule. Response cost reduced overall rates of responding, but tended to suppress bout-initiation responding more than within-bout responding (Experiments 1 & 2). In contrast, reinforcement magnitude increased all forms of responding (Experiment 2). One explanation consistent with these effects is that bout-initiation responses are controlled by overall rates of reinforcement through their impact on the context (i.e. are stimulus-driven), but that within-bout responses are controlled by response reinforcement (i.e. are goal-directed). These current findings are discussed in the light of these theoretical suggestions.
两项实验研究了与基于发作起始性质和发作内反应的预测相关的控制人类自由操作行为的因素。总体而言,在强化率相等的情况下,随机比率(RR)时间表的反应高于随机间隔(RI)时间表。两种时间表的发作起始率没有差异,但RR时间表的发作内率更高。反应代价降低了总体反应率,但往往比发作内反应更能抑制发作起始反应(实验1和2)。相比之下,强化幅度增加了所有形式的反应(实验2)。与这些效应一致的一种解释是,发作起始反应受强化总体率通过其对情境的影响所控制(即受刺激驱动),而发作内反应受反应强化所控制(即目标导向)。根据这些理论建议对当前这些发现进行了讨论。