• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大鼠对具有线性反馈函数的随机间隔时间表和随机比率时间表的不同方面表现出臼齿敏感性。

Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.

作者信息

Reed Phil

机构信息

Swansea University.

出版信息

J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):432-43. doi: 10.1037/xan0000065. Epub 2015 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1037/xan0000065
PMID:25915752
Abstract

Three experiments examined the impact of various aspects of reinforcement contingencies on responding maintained by free-operant schedules by food-deprived rats. Experiment 1 demonstrated that random interval (RI) and random-interval-with-positive-response-reinforcer-feedback (RI+) schedules maintained similar rates of responding at a variety of reinforcer frequencies. Experiment 2 demonstrated that a random ratio (RR) schedule maintained higher rates than RI or RI+ schedules, except at high rates of reinforcement, where response rates were similar on all schedules. Experiment 3 again demonstrated that RR schedules produced higher response rates than either RI or RI+ schedules, but modification of the RI+ schedule to prevent ratio strain enhanced response rates relative to an RI schedule. Together these results reveal a pattern of interacting factors in schedule controlled behavior: at high rates of reinforcement, this factor overrides the impact of other controlling factors, but as reinforcement rate decreases the joint impact of interresponse times reinforcement, response-reinforcer feedback functions, and ratio strain are observed.

摘要

三项实验研究了强化偶然性的各个方面对食物剥夺大鼠自由操作式程序维持反应的影响。实验1表明,随机间隔(RI)和带阳性反应强化物反馈的随机间隔(RI+)程序在各种强化物频率下维持着相似的反应速率。实验2表明,随机比率(RR)程序维持的反应速率高于RI或RI+程序,但在高强化率时除外,此时所有程序的反应速率相似。实验3再次表明,RR程序产生的反应速率高于RI或RI+程序,但对RI+程序进行修改以防止比率应变相对于RI程序提高了反应速率。这些结果共同揭示了程序控制行为中相互作用因素的模式:在高强化率时,该因素超越其他控制因素的影响,但随着强化率降低,可观察到反应间隔时间、强化、反应-强化物反馈功能和比率应变的共同影响。

相似文献

1
Rats show molar sensitivity to different aspects of random-interval-with-linear-feedback-functions and random-ratio schedules.大鼠对具有线性反馈函数的随机间隔时间表和随机比率时间表的不同方面表现出臼齿敏感性。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2015 Oct;41(4):432-43. doi: 10.1037/xan0000065. Epub 2015 Apr 27.
2
Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.采用线性反馈回路防止随机间隔时间表上反应应变的程序。
Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):78-84. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0192-z.
3
Free-operant performance on variable interval schedules with a linear feedback loop: no evidence for molar sensitivities in rats.具有线性反馈回路的可变间隔时间表上的自由操作行为:大鼠中无整体敏感性的证据。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2000 Oct;26(4):416-27. doi: 10.1037//0097-7403.26.4.416.
4
Human performance on random interval schedules.人类在随机间隔时间表上的表现。
J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn. 2018 Jul;44(3):309-321. doi: 10.1037/xan0000172.
5
Response rate and sensitivity to the molar feedback function relating response and reinforcement rate on VI+ schedules of reinforcement.在可变间隔加强化(VI+)强化程序中,反应率以及对将反应与强化率联系起来的摩尔反馈函数的敏感性。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2007 Oct;33(4):428-39. doi: 10.1037/0097-7403.33.4.428.
6
An experimental analysis of steady-state response rate components on variable ratio and variable interval schedules of reinforcement.关于强化的可变比率和可变间隔时间表上稳态反应率成分的实验分析。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 2011 Jan;37(1):1-9. doi: 10.1037/a0019387.
7
Rats' performance on variable-interval schedules with a linear feedback loop between response rate and reinforcement rate.大鼠在具有反应率和强化率之间线性反馈回路的可变间隔时间表上的表现。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2003 Mar;79(2):157-73. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2003.79-157.
8
Factors controlling the micro-structure of human free-operant behaviour: Bout-initiation and within-bout responses are effected by different aspects of the schedule.控制人类自由操作行为微观结构的因素:行为起始和行为内反应受强化程序不同方面的影响。
Behav Processes. 2020 Jun;175:104106. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2020.104106. Epub 2020 Mar 21.
9
Parametric manipulation of interresponse-time contingency independent of reinforcement rate.与强化率无关的反应间隔偶然性的参数操纵。
J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process. 1986 Oct;12(4):371-80.
10
Response acquisition with intermittent immediate and delayed conditioned reinforcement.间歇性即时和延迟条件强化的反应获取。
J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Mar;99(2):189-98. doi: 10.1002/jeab.14. Epub 2013 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Bouts, Pauses, and Units of Operant Performance: A Primer.操作性行为表现的发作、停顿与单元:入门指南
Perspect Behav Sci. 2024 Aug 30;47(3):643-674. doi: 10.1007/s40614-024-00419-z. eCollection 2024 Sep.
2
Human free-operant performance varies with a concurrent task: Probability learning without a task, and schedule-consistent with a task.人类的自由操作行为会因一项并发任务而有所不同:无任务时的概率学习,以及与任务一致的时间表。
Learn Behav. 2020 Jun;48(2):254-273. doi: 10.3758/s13420-019-00398-1.
3
Procedure for preventing response strain on random interval schedules with a linear feedback loop.
采用线性反馈回路防止随机间隔时间表上反应应变的程序。
Learn Behav. 2016 Mar;44(1):78-84. doi: 10.3758/s13420-015-0192-z.