• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)评估再犯风险的优势和因素之间的相互作用。

Assessing the Interactions between Strengths and Risk Factors of Recidivism through the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY).

机构信息

Health Research Center, Faculty of Psychology, University of Almería, 04120 La Cañada, Almería, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062112.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17062112
PMID:32209969
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7142985/
Abstract

Instruments that assess recidivism risk in young people are used widely in the sphere of juvenile justice worldwide. Traditionally, research has focused on the study of risk factors presented by young offenders, and how these relate to criminal recidivism. In present-day research, protective factors have also come into their own, having proven to encourage non-recidivism in young offenders. This paper presents a study carried out with 594 young offenders. The instrument used for assessing risk of recidivism in young offenders was the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY). In the results found here, one can observe how the young offenders who did not reoffend presented a greater level of protective factors than the repeating offenders. The youths with a prior arrest record scored higher in the risk domains than the reoffenders without a prior arrest record. The case of young repeat offenders who already had an arrest record represents a high-risk profile, or a profile of a criminal career. Crimes committed by young people can be isolated incidents in their life. In most youths, criminal behavior does not persist beyond legal age. Protective factors prove to be important in juvenile justice when planning an individualized intervention for the young offender.

摘要

在全球范围内,评估年轻人累犯风险的工具在少年司法领域得到广泛应用。传统上,研究主要集中在研究年轻罪犯表现出的风险因素,以及这些因素与犯罪累犯的关系上。在当今的研究中,保护因素也开始发挥作用,事实证明,这些因素可以鼓励年轻罪犯不再累犯。本文介绍了一项对 594 名年轻罪犯进行的研究。用于评估年轻罪犯累犯风险的工具是青少年暴力风险结构化评估工具(SAVRY)。在发现的结果中,可以观察到没有再次犯罪的年轻罪犯比再次犯罪的罪犯表现出更多的保护因素。有先前被捕记录的青少年在风险领域的得分高于没有先前被捕记录的再犯罪者。那些已经有被捕记录的年轻惯犯代表着高风险特征或犯罪生涯特征。年轻人犯罪可能只是他们生活中的孤立事件。在大多数青少年中,犯罪行为不会持续到法定年龄之后。在为年轻罪犯制定个性化干预措施时,保护因素在少年司法中被证明是很重要的。

相似文献

1
Assessing the Interactions between Strengths and Risk Factors of Recidivism through the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY).通过青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)评估再犯风险的优势和因素之间的相互作用。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 23;17(6):2112. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062112.
2
Risk Assessment in Juvenile and Young Adult Offenders: Predictive Validity of the SAVRY and SAPROF-YV.青少年和年轻成年罪犯的风险评估:SAVRY 和 SAPROF-YV 的预测效度。
Assessment. 2022 Mar;29(2):181-197. doi: 10.1177/1073191120959740. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
Use of structured professional judgment by probation officers to assess risk for recidivism in adolescent offenders.缓刑监督官运用结构化专业判断来评估青少年罪犯再次犯罪的风险。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):652-663. doi: 10.1037/pas0000414.
4
Predicting Reoffending Using the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY): A 5-Year Follow-Up Study of Male Juvenile Offenders in Hunan Province, China.使用青少年暴力风险结构化评估(SAVRY)预测再犯罪:对中国湖南省男性少年犯的5年随访研究
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169251. eCollection 2017.
5
Predicting risk of recidivism in Spanish young offenders: Comparative analysis of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI.预测西班牙年轻罪犯再犯风险:SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的比较分析。
Psicothema. 2020 May;32(2):221-228. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2019.275.
6
Differences between juvenile offenders with and without substance use problems in the prevalence and impact of risk and protective factors for criminal recidivism.有物质使用问题和没有物质使用问题的青少年罪犯在犯罪再犯的风险和保护因素的流行程度和影响方面存在差异。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2014 Jan 1;134:267-274. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2013.10.012. Epub 2013 Oct 28.
7
Examining the validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) for predicting probation outcomes among adjudicated juvenile offenders.探讨青少年暴力风险结构化评估量表(SAVRY)在预测被判决的少年犯缓刑结果方面的有效性。
Behav Sci Law. 2013 Mar-Apr;31(2):256-70. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2060. Epub 2013 Apr 22.
8
Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.性犯罪少年被告中的保护因素与累犯情况
Sex Abuse. 2015 Feb;27(1):71-90. doi: 10.1177/1079063214554958. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
9
The Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth for Young Spanish Offenders.青少年暴力风险结构化评估对西班牙年轻罪犯的预测效度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00577. eCollection 2017.
10
Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY) with Indigenous and Caucasian female and male adolescents on probation.《青少年结构化暴力风险评估量表(SAVRY)对在押的土著和白种男女青少年的预测效度》
Psychol Assess. 2020 Jun;32(6):594-607. doi: 10.1037/pas0000816. Epub 2020 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Social predictors of the transition from anomie to deviance in adolescence.青少年从失范到越轨的社会预测因素。
PLoS One. 2022 Jun 22;17(6):e0269236. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0269236. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
How to Improve the YLS/CMI? Exploring a Particularly Predictive Combination of Items.如何提高 YLS/CMI?探索项目的特别预测组合。
Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2020 Jul;64(9):922-937. doi: 10.1177/0306624X19881926. Epub 2019 Oct 14.
2
Sociodemographic variables, risk factors, and protective factors contributing to youth recidivism.导致青少年累犯的社会人口学变量、风险因素和保护因素。
Psicothema. 2019 May;31(2):128-133. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2018.257.
3
Male antisocial behaviour in adolescence and beyond.青少年及成年期男性的反社会行为。
Nat Hum Behav. 2018;2:177-186. Epub 2018 Feb 21.
4
Assessing Protective Factors for Adolescent Offending: A Conceptually Informed Examination of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI.评估青少年犯罪的保护因素:对青少年暴力风险评估指南(SAVRY)和青少年服务与案件管理工具(YLS/CMI)的概念性深入考察
Assessment. 2020 Jul;27(5):959-975. doi: 10.1177/1073191118768435. Epub 2018 May 2.
5
Do risk assessment tools help manage and reduce risk of violence and reoffending? A systematic review.风险评估工具是否有助于管理和降低暴力行为和再犯罪的风险?系统评价。
Law Hum Behav. 2018 Jun;42(3):181-214. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000280. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
6
Are risk assessments racially biased?: Field study of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI in probation.风险评估存在种族偏见吗?:缓刑中SAVRY和YLS/CMI的实地研究。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Jun;29(6):664-678. doi: 10.1037/pas0000445.
7
The Predictive Validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth for Young Spanish Offenders.青少年暴力风险结构化评估对西班牙年轻罪犯的预测效度。
Front Psychol. 2017 Apr 12;8:577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00577. eCollection 2017.
8
Are adolescent risk assessment tools sensitive to change? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and the YLS/CMI.青少年风险评估工具是否敏感于变化?SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的框架和检验。
Law Hum Behav. 2017 Jun;41(3):244-257. doi: 10.1037/lhb0000238. Epub 2017 Apr 6.
9
Does reassessment of risk improve predictions? A framework and examination of the SAVRY and YLS/CMI.重新评估风险是否能提高预测准确性?SAVRY 和 YLS/CMI 的框架和检验。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Sep;29(9):1096-1110. doi: 10.1037/pas0000402. Epub 2016 Nov 7.
10
Identifying Risk and Protective Factors in Recidivist Juvenile Offenders: A Decision Tree Approach.识别累犯少年犯的风险和保护因素:一种决策树方法。
PLoS One. 2016 Sep 9;11(9):e0160423. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160423. eCollection 2016.