• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“校园行动”项目支持青少年体育活动和健康生活方式的研究方案及基线特征

Study protocol and baseline characteristics of "SCHOOL IN ACTION" program on support to physical activity and healthy lifestyles in adolescents.

作者信息

Ferreira da Silva Dos Santos Sueyla, Bordin Drenya, Dornelas de Souza Elaine Fernanda, Freitas Júnior Ismael Forte

机构信息

Institute of Social Science, Education and Zootechnics, Federal University of Amazonas, Parintins, Amazonas, Brazil.

Faculty of Science and Technology, São Paulo State University, Presidente Prudente, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Dec 14;17:100505. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100505. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100505
PMID:32211554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7083769/
Abstract

Physical activity promotes positive effects on people's health, but most adolescents do not engage in sufficient physical activity to receive the benefits. Studies suggest that school-based interventions can be effective in increasing physical activity in adolescents. However, the literature is inconsistent on the effect size and the type of intervention. This paper presents the design of the SCHOOL IN ACTION program to increase physical activity engagement and healthy eating habits. The cluster randomized controlled trial was performed during a period of six months of intervention and 12 months of follow-up in adolescents from four Brazilian public schools. The theoretical model is based on health promoting schools and the social-ecological and self-determination theory. The action strategies were: improvement of exercises intensity during physical education classes and during lunch breaks; vegetable gardening experience; active breaks in non-physical education classes; counselling health to parents and adolescents and changes in the school environment to promote physical activity and healthy eating. Primary variables were physical activity and sedentary behavior (both assessed by accelerometers). Secondary variables were body composition (assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry) and eating habits (assessed by questionnaire and 3-day food recall). Questionnaires were used to assess other information related to life satisfaction, health behavior and socioeconomic information. Statistical analysis will follow the principles of intention-to-treat and will explore the composition data analysis and mediating factors of lifestyle-related behaviors. We propose that SCHOOL IN ACTION program will be effective to provide evidence to increase physical activity and food healthy habits in adolescents' students. : NCT03153176. Follow-up and data analysis.

摘要

体育活动对人们的健康有积极影响,但大多数青少年没有进行足够的体育活动以获得这些益处。研究表明,基于学校的干预措施可以有效增加青少年的体育活动。然而,关于干预措施的效果大小和类型,文献中的说法并不一致。本文介绍了“行动中的学校”计划的设计,该计划旨在提高体育活动参与度和培养健康饮食习惯。这项整群随机对照试验在巴西四所公立学校的青少年中进行,为期6个月的干预期和12个月的随访期。理论模型基于健康促进学校以及社会生态和自我决定理论。行动策略包括:提高体育课和午休期间的运动强度;蔬菜园艺体验;非体育课上的积极休息;为家长和青少年提供健康咨询;改变学校环境以促进体育活动和健康饮食。主要变量是体育活动和久坐行为(均通过加速度计评估)。次要变量是身体成分(通过双能X射线吸收法评估)和饮食习惯(通过问卷调查和3天食物回顾评估)。问卷用于评估与生活满意度、健康行为和社会经济信息相关的其他信息。统计分析将遵循意向性分析原则,并探索生活方式相关行为的构成数据分析和中介因素。我们认为,“行动中的学校”计划将有效地为增加青少年学生的体育活动和健康饮食习惯提供证据。:NCT03153176。随访与数据分析。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e8/7083769/379f096a2c62/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e8/7083769/444c9edd5ce0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e8/7083769/379f096a2c62/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e8/7083769/444c9edd5ce0/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/33e8/7083769/379f096a2c62/gr2.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol and baseline characteristics of "SCHOOL IN ACTION" program on support to physical activity and healthy lifestyles in adolescents.“校园行动”项目支持青少年体育活动和健康生活方式的研究方案及基线特征
Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2019 Dec 14;17:100505. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100505. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Rationale and methods of a cluster-randomized controlled trial to promote active and healthy lifestyles among Brazilian students: the "Fortaleça sua Saúde" program.一项在巴西学生中促进积极健康生活方式的整群随机对照试验的原理与方法:“增强你的健康”计划
BMC Public Health. 2015 Dec 7;15:1212. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2543-2.
3
Impact of school-based vegetable garden and physical activity coordinated health interventions on weight status and weight-related behaviors of ethnically diverse, low-income students: Study design and baseline data of the Texas, Grow! Eat! Go! (TGEG) cluster-randomized controlled trial.基于学校的菜园与体育活动协同健康干预对不同种族、低收入学生体重状况及与体重相关行为的影响:德克萨斯州“种植!饮食!行动!”(TGEG)整群随机对照试验的研究设计与基线数据
BMC Public Health. 2016 Sep 13;16(1):973. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3453-7.
4
Fuel for Fun: a cluster-randomized controlled study of cooking skills, eating behaviors, and physical activity of 4th graders and their families.趣味燃料:一项关于四年级学生及其家庭烹饪技能、饮食行为和身体活动的整群随机对照研究。
BMC Public Health. 2016 May 26;16:444. doi: 10.1186/s12889-016-3118-6.
5
Rationale and design of the school-based SI! Program to face obesity and promote health among Spanish adolescents: A cluster-randomized controlled trial.基于学校的 SI! 计划应对西班牙青少年肥胖和促进健康的理由和设计:一项整群随机对照试验。
Am Heart J. 2019 Sep;215:27-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2019.03.014. Epub 2019 Apr 10.
6
Can High Schools Be an Effective Setting to Promote Healthy Lifestyles? Effects of a Multiple Behavior Change Intervention in Adolescents.高中能否成为促进健康生活方式的有效场所?一项针对青少年多种行为改变干预的效果。
J Adolesc Health. 2019 Apr;64(4):478-486. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2018.09.027. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
7
Effects of a multi-level intervention on the pattern of physical activity among in-school adolescents in Oyo state Nigeria: a cluster randomised trial.尼日利亚奥约州在校青少年身体活动模式的多级干预效果:一项整群随机试验
BMC Public Health. 2017 Oct 23;17(1):833. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4781-y.
8
A cluster randomised trial of an intervention to increase the implementation of physical activity practices in secondary schools: study protocol for scaling up the Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1) program.一项增加中学开展身体活动实践的干预措施的整群随机试验:扩大身体活动 4 每个人(PA4E1)计划的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):883. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-6965-0.
9
A Healthy School Start Plus for prevention of childhood overweight and obesity in disadvantaged areas through parental support in the school setting - study protocol for a parallel group cluster randomised trial.通过学校环境中父母支持预防弱势地区儿童超重和肥胖的健康学校启动加方案 - 一项平行组群组随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 6;18(1):459. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5354-4.
10
A school-based intervention program in promoting leisure-time physical activity: trial protocol.促进课余体力活动的基于学校的干预计划:试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 2;18(1):433. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5320-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of a school-based physical activity intervention on mental health indicators in a sample of Brazilian adolescents: a cluster randomized controlled trial.一项基于学校的体育活动干预对巴西青少年样本心理健康指标的影响:一项整群随机对照试验。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 10;25(1):539. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21620-y.
2
School-based physical activity programs for promoting physical activity and fitness in children and adolescents aged 6 to 18.以学校为基础的身体活动计划促进 6 至 18 岁儿童和青少年身体活动和健康。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Sep 23;9(9):CD007651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007651.pub3.

本文引用的文献

1
Are school-based physical activity interventions effective and equitable? A meta-analysis of cluster randomized controlled trials with accelerometer-assessed activity.基于学校的身体活动干预措施是否有效且公平?使用加速度计评估活动的整群随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Obes Rev. 2019 Jun;20(6):859-870. doi: 10.1111/obr.12823. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
2
Exercise, health outcomes, and pædiatric obesity: A systematic review of meta-analyses.运动、健康结果和儿科肥胖:荟萃分析的系统评价。
J Sci Med Sport. 2019 Jan;22(1):76-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2018.07.006. Epub 2018 Jul 24.
3
Examining individual, interpersonal, and environmental influences on children's physical activity levels.
考察个体、人际和环境因素对儿童身体活动水平的影响。
SSM Popul Health. 2017 Nov 16;4:76-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2017.11.004. eCollection 2018 Apr.
4
Development, Implementation, and Evaluation of an Interdisciplinary Theory- and Evidence-Based Intervention to Prevent Childhood Obesity: Theoretical and Methodological Lessons Learned.一种基于理论和证据的跨学科干预措施预防儿童肥胖的开发、实施与评估:经验教训与理论方法
Front Public Health. 2017 Dec 22;5:352. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00352. eCollection 2017.
5
Socio-cultural determinants of physical activity across the life course: a 'Determinants of Diet and Physical Activity' (DEDIPAC) umbrella systematic literature review.一生中身体活动的社会文化决定因素:“饮食与身体活动决定因素”(DEDIPAC)综合系统文献综述
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Dec 20;14(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0627-3.
6
The influence of physical activity, sedentary behavior on health-related quality of life among the general population of children and adolescents: A systematic review.身体活动和久坐行为对儿童及青少年普通人群健康相关生活质量的影响:一项系统综述。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 9;12(11):e0187668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187668. eCollection 2017.
7
An internet-supported school physical activity intervention in low socioeconomic status communities: results from the Activity and Motivation in Physical Education (AMPED) cluster randomised controlled trial.在社会经济地位较低的社区中开展基于互联网的学校体育活动干预:来自体育教育活动与动机(AMPED)集群随机对照试验的结果。
Br J Sports Med. 2019 Mar;53(6):341-347. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2017-097904. Epub 2017 Oct 9.
8
The effectiveness of school-based physical activity interventions for adolescent girls: A systematic review and meta-analysis.基于学校的身体活动干预对少女有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prev Med. 2017 Dec;105:237-249. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.09.018. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
9
A systematic review and meta-analysis of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity levels in secondary school physical education lessons.中学体育课中中等至剧烈身体活动水平的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017 Apr 24;14(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s12966-017-0504-0.
10
Health Benefits of Light-Intensity Physical Activity: A Systematic Review of Accelerometer Data of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).低强度身体活动的健康益处:对全国健康和营养检查调查(NHANES)加速度计数据的系统评价。
Sports Med. 2017 Sep;47(9):1769-1793. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0724-0.