• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

原发性单纯性腹股沟疝的慢性疼痛与不适:一项比较经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放式修补手术并进行3年随访的前瞻性研究。

Chronic Pain and Discomfort in Primary Uncomplicated Groin Hernia: A Prospective Study Comparing Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) to Open Repair Surgery With a 3-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Consalvo Vincenzo, D'Auria Francesca, Salsano Vincenzo

机构信息

AOU San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi d'Aragona, Salerno, Italy, Clinique Clementville, Montpellier, France.

AOU Maggiore della Caritá, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:119-123.

PMID:32212137
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chronic pain still occurs in 10-12% of patients who undergo surgical groin hernia repair. Considering the high prevalence of this pathology, we performed a single-center prospective study comparing the laparoscopic trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) approach to the standard surgical open technique for primary uncomplicated hernia repair.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 278 patients was extracted from our dataset: 121 received a laparoscopic TAPP approach, and 157 were treated by the Lichtenstein technique in case of inguinal hernia or by the deployment of a polypropylene plug in case of femoral hernia. Both groups were followed-up for 3 years.

RESULTS

A significant difference in haematoma/seroma collection was found (P=0.001) among the groups. Wound infection (P=0.001) and pain perception in the perioperative and early post-operative period were significantly reduced in the TAPP group (P=0.0023 and P<0.0021, respectively). Chronic discomfort at 3-year follow-up was higher in the open approach (P=0.0044), while operative time was marginally shorter compared to TAPP (P =0.002).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of chronic pain and the overall complication rate were significantly lower with the TAPP approach. Based on our findings, the TAPP approach deserves to be considered as the treatment of choice for uncomplicated single-site primary hernia surgery. Further studies with a larger sample will be needed to confirm these preliminary data.

摘要

背景

接受腹股沟疝修补手术的患者中,仍有10% - 12%会出现慢性疼痛。鉴于这种病症的高发病率,我们开展了一项单中心前瞻性研究,比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与标准外科开放技术用于原发性单纯疝修补的效果。

方法

从我们的数据集中提取了278例患者的前瞻性队列:121例接受腹腔镜TAPP手术,157例腹股沟疝患者采用利氏修补术治疗,股疝患者则采用聚丙烯补片植入术治疗。两组均随访3年。

结果

两组间血肿/血清肿形成情况存在显著差异(P = 0.001)。TAPP组的伤口感染(P = 0.001)以及围手术期和术后早期的疼痛感知均显著降低(分别为P = 0.0023和P < 0.0021)。开放手术组在3年随访时的慢性不适发生率更高(P = 0.0044),而手术时间比TAPP组略短(P = 0.002)。

结论

TAPP手术方式的慢性疼痛发生率和总体并发症率显著更低。基于我们的研究结果,TAPP手术方式值得被视为单纯单部位原发性疝手术的首选治疗方法。需要进一步开展更大样本量的研究来证实这些初步数据。

相似文献

1
Chronic Pain and Discomfort in Primary Uncomplicated Groin Hernia: A Prospective Study Comparing Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) to Open Repair Surgery With a 3-Year Follow-Up.原发性单纯性腹股沟疝的慢性疼痛与不适:一项比较经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放式修补手术并进行3年随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:119-123.
2
A prospective randomized comparison of testicular functions, sexual functions and quality of life following laparoscopic totally extra-peritoneal (TEP) and trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repairs.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)和经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术后睾丸功能、性功能及生活质量的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Mar;31(3):1478-1486. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5142-0. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
3
A comparative analysis of trans-abdominal pre-peritoneal repair in uncomplicated vs complicated inguinal hernia repair.对比分析单纯性腹股沟疝修补术与复杂性腹股沟疝修补术经腹腹膜前修补术的疗效。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2023 Jul;16(3):354-361. doi: 10.1111/ases.13163. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
4
[Operative strategy and short-term efficacy of recurrent groin hernia].[复发性腹股沟疝的手术策略及短期疗效]
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2018 Jul 25;21(7):761-765.
5
Outcomes After Laparoscopic Transabdominal Pre-Peritoneal Repair (TAPP) For Groin Hernia In A Single Consultant Series.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)治疗腹股沟疝的单中心系列研究结果。
Ulster Med J. 2022 Jan;91(1):4-8. Epub 2022 Feb 11.
6
The change in groin pain perception after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair with glue fixation: a prospective trial of a single surgeon's experience.经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术中使用胶固定后腹股沟疼痛感知的变化:一位单刀医生经验的前瞻性试验。
Surg Endosc. 2018 Oct;32(10):4284-4289. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-6178-0. Epub 2018 Mar 30.
7
Lichtenstein versus TIPP versus TAPP versus TEP for primary inguinal hernia, a matched propensity score study on the French Club Hernie Registry.经匹配倾向评分的法国疝学会登记研究:腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)、完全腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)与经腹疝修补术(TIPP)、Lichtenstein 修补术治疗原发性腹股沟疝的对比。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1165-1177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02737-8. Epub 2023 Feb 8.
8
Laparoscopic transperitoneal inguinal hernioplasty (TAPP) after radical open retropubic prostatectomy: special features and clinical outcomes.腹腔镜经腹腔腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在根治性开放耻骨后前列腺切除术之后的应用:特殊特征和临床结局。
Hernia. 2019 Apr;23(2):281-286. doi: 10.1007/s10029-018-1846-5. Epub 2018 Nov 7.
9
A prospective randomized study comparing laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein repair for bilateral inguinal hernias.一项比较腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦修补术治疗双侧腹股沟疝的前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2018 Jul;216(1):78-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.07.016. Epub 2017 Jul 19.
10
Assessment of the incidence of chronic pain and discomfort after primary inguinal hernia repair.原发性腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛和不适发生率的评估。
J Surg Res. 2016 Dec;206(2):391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2016.08.027. Epub 2016 Aug 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of short- and long-term efficacy and economic indicators between transabdominal preperitoneal and open tension-free repair for inguinal hernia in adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.成人腹股沟疝经腹腹膜前修补术与开放式无张力修补术的短期和长期疗效及经济指标比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Hernia. 2025 Aug 7;29(1):248. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03435-3.
2
Comparison of the therapeutic effects of different pneumoperitoneum pressures on laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair: a randomized controlled trail.不同气腹压力对腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术治疗效果的比较:一项随机对照试验
Acta Cir Bras. 2024 Dec 6;39:e399824. doi: 10.1590/acb399824. eCollection 2024.
3
Comparison of modified tumescent and conventional laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: a retrospective clinical study.
改良肿胀技术与传统腹腔镜经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的比较:一项回顾性临床研究。
J Int Med Res. 2024 Jan;52(1):3000605231220789. doi: 10.1177/03000605231220789.
4
Evaluation of long-term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.单侧与双侧环形切口经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的长期慢性疼痛及预后评估
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Feb 16;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12556. eCollection 2022 Jul.