• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单侧与双侧环形切口经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的长期慢性疼痛及预后评估

Evaluation of long-term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.

作者信息

Hayakawa Shunsuke, Hayakawa Tetsushi, Watanabe Kaori, Saito Kenta, Miyai Hirotaka, Ogawa Ryo, Yamamoto Minoru, Kobayashi Kenji, Takiguchi Shuji, Tanaka Moritsugu

机构信息

Department of General surgery Kariya Toyota General Hospital Kariya Japan.

Department of Gastroenterological Surgery Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences Nagoya Japan.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Feb 16;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12556. eCollection 2022 Jul.

DOI:10.1002/ags3.12556
PMID:35847434
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9271018/
Abstract

AIM

This study has two aims: to evaluate long-term chronic pain and complications after circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair (C-TAPP) and compare outcomes of unilateral and bilateral inguinal hernia cases.

METHODS

A postoperative patient questionnaire was used to evaluate pain and complications in 1546 patients who underwent C-TAPP for simple inguinal hernia. Questions concerned satisfaction with surgery, pain at rest, pain at movement, mesh discomfort on a 10-point scale, and complications, such as recurrence. Patients were classified into unilateral (U Group) and bilateral (B Group) groups, and propensity score matching was performed to compare long-term chronic pain and complications.

RESULTS

The questionnaire return rates were 77.5% (1034 cases) and 79.9% (135 cases) in unilateral and bilateral cases. The frequency of moderate-to-severe (≥4 points) pain at rest, pain at movement, and mesh discomfort were 3.2%, 3.6%, and 4.5%, respectively. After propensity score matching, no significant differences in pain at rest ( = .726), at movement ( = .712), or mesh discomfort ( = .981) were detected between the U and B groups. Postoperative complications occurred in 2.1% of all patients, and the recurrence rate was 0.3%. In the post-match comparison, no differences in complications with Clavian-Dindo classification ≥III (U Group 0.7%, B Group 2.1%,  = .622) were detected.

CONCLUSION

C-TAPP, which focuses on the layered structure, showed acceptable results for long-term chronic pain. Bilateral cases did not have worse pain or complications compared to unilateral cases.

摘要

目的

本研究有两个目的:评估经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术(C-TAPP)后的长期慢性疼痛和并发症,并比较单侧和双侧腹股沟疝病例的手术效果。

方法

采用术后患者问卷对1546例行C-TAPP治疗单纯腹股沟疝的患者的疼痛和并发症进行评估。问题包括对手术的满意度、静息痛、活动痛、用10分制评估的补片不适以及并发症,如复发情况。患者分为单侧组(U组)和双侧组(B组),并进行倾向评分匹配以比较长期慢性疼痛和并发症。

结果

单侧和双侧病例的问卷回复率分别为77.5%(1034例)和79.9%(135例)。静息时、活动时中度至重度(≥4分)疼痛以及补片不适的发生率分别为3.2%、3.6%和4.5%。倾向评分匹配后,U组和B组在静息痛(P = 0.726)、活动痛(P = 0.712)或补片不适(P = 0.981)方面未发现显著差异。所有患者术后并发症发生率为2.1%,复发率为0.3%。在匹配后比较中,未发现Clavian-Dindo分类≥III级并发症存在差异(U组0.7%,B组2.1%,P = 0.622)。

结论

注重层次结构的C-TAPP在长期慢性疼痛方面显示出可接受的结果。与单侧病例相比,双侧病例的疼痛或并发症并未更严重。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/262d176ce593/AGS3-6-577-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/d5655fa4af3c/AGS3-6-577-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/3e70bc6ca3e9/AGS3-6-577-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/8d2c698e2206/AGS3-6-577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/12a8591ec7ae/AGS3-6-577-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/262d176ce593/AGS3-6-577-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/d5655fa4af3c/AGS3-6-577-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/3e70bc6ca3e9/AGS3-6-577-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/8d2c698e2206/AGS3-6-577-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/12a8591ec7ae/AGS3-6-577-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5d4/9271018/262d176ce593/AGS3-6-577-g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of long-term chronic pain and outcomes for unilateral vs bilateral circular incision transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair.单侧与双侧环形切口经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的长期慢性疼痛及预后评估
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2022 Feb 16;6(4):577-586. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12556. eCollection 2022 Jul.
2
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal hernioplasty: 1,054 procedures and experience.单切口经腹腹膜前腹腔镜疝修补术:1054 例手术及经验。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1187-1194. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02803-1. Epub 2023 May 28.
3
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与开放网塞修补术治疗双侧原发性腹股沟疝的比较
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 11;4(2):156-162. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12314. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Prospective comparison of two surgical approaches for incarcerated and strangulated inguinal hernia: preperitoneal hernioplasty through the lower abdominal median incision and laparoscope (TAPP).经下腹正中切口腹膜前疝修补术与腹腔镜(TAPP)治疗嵌顿绞窄性腹股沟疝的前瞻性对比研究。
Updates Surg. 2024 Nov;76(7):2603-2610. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01944-x. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
5
Return to Work in Patients With Unilateral Inguinal Hernia Surgery: A Comparative Study Between Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Approach and Lichtenstein Tension-Free Mesh Repair.单侧腹股沟疝手术患者的重返工作情况:腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与李金斯坦无张力疝修补术的比较研究
Cureus. 2023 May 18;15(5):e39202. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39202. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Nationwide Results on Chronic Pain After Bilateral Transabdominal Preperitoneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.双侧经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术后慢性疼痛的全国性结果。
Scand J Surg. 2020 Dec;109(4):289-294. doi: 10.1177/1457496919874483. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
7
Single-incision laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal mesh hernioplasty: results in 182 Japanese patients.单切口腹腔镜经腹腹膜前补片疝修补术:182例日本患者的手术结果
Hernia. 2016 Dec;20(6):797-803. doi: 10.1007/s10029-016-1540-4. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
8
Early Outcomes of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)修补术的早期疗效
Cureus. 2023 Feb 28;15(2):e35567. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35567. eCollection 2023 Feb.
9
Current trends and outcomes for unilateral groin hernia repairs in the United States using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database: A multicenter propensity score matching analysis of 30-day and 1-year outcomes.美国使用腹部核心健康质量协作数据库的单侧腹股沟疝修复的当前趋势和结果:30 天和 1 年结果的多中心倾向评分匹配分析。
Surgery. 2024 Apr;175(4):1071-1080. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.11.033. Epub 2024 Jan 12.
10
Comparison of Early Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Suture Fixation Versus Tack Fixation of Mesh in Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) Repair of Inguinal Hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中采用缝线固定与钉合固定补片患者的早期结局比较。
Cureus. 2022 Jul 13;14(7):e26821. doi: 10.7759/cureus.26821. eCollection 2022 Jul.

引用本文的文献

1
Case Report: Perioperative Management of a Patient with Glycogen Storage Disease Type IXd.病例报告:IXd型糖原贮积病患者的围手术期管理
Surg Case Rep. 2025;11(1). doi: 10.70352/scrj.cr.25-0239. Epub 2025 Sep 4.
2
Severity classification and risk factors of seroma after transabdominal preperitoneal hernia repair.经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿的严重程度分级及危险因素
Hernia. 2025 May 23;29(1):177. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03366-z.
3
A Simple Procedure for Mesh Suture Fixation in Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Technical Report.

本文引用的文献

1
Short- and Long-Term Outcomes of Transabdominal Preperitoneal, Open Mesh Plug and Open Tissue Inguinal Hernia Repair.经腹腹膜前疝修补术、开放式网塞及开放式组织腹股沟疝修补术的短期和长期疗效。
World J Surg. 2021 Mar;45(3):730-737. doi: 10.1007/s00268-020-05864-w. Epub 2020 Nov 20.
2
Patient-reported chronic pain after open inguinal hernia repair with lightweight or heavyweight mesh: a prospective, patient-reported outcomes study.采用轻质或重磅补片进行开放性腹股沟疝修补术后患者报告的慢性疼痛:一项前瞻性、患者报告结局研究。
Br J Surg. 2020 Nov;107(12):1659-1666. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11755. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
3
Laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair versus open mesh plug repair for bilateral primary inguinal hernia.
机器人腹股沟疝修补术中网片缝合固定的简单操作:技术报告
Cureus. 2025 Apr 9;17(4):e81982. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81982. eCollection 2025 Apr.
4
Little influence of the abandoned sac on seroma formation following laparoscopic transabdominal preperitoneal repair of lateral inguinal hernia.腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补外侧腹股沟疝后,废弃疝囊对血清肿形成影响较小。
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1740-1748. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11523-1. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
5
Modified Frailty Index and Albumin-Fibrinogen Ratio Predicts Postoperative Seroma After Laparoscopic TAPP.改良衰弱指数和白蛋白-纤维蛋白原比值预测腹腔镜经腹腹膜前疝修补术后血清肿。
Clin Interv Aging. 2023 Aug 22;18:1397-1403. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S418338. eCollection 2023.
6
Comparison of short-term outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic transabdominal peritoneal repair for unilateral inguinal hernia: a propensity-score matched analysis.机器人与腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补单侧腹股沟疝的短期疗效比较:倾向评分匹配分析。
Hernia. 2023 Oct;27(5):1131-1138. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02730-7. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
腹腔镜经腹腹膜前修补术与开放网塞修补术治疗双侧原发性腹股沟疝的比较
Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2020 Feb 11;4(2):156-162. doi: 10.1002/ags3.12314. eCollection 2020 Mar.
4
Chronic Pain and Discomfort in Primary Uncomplicated Groin Hernia: A Prospective Study Comparing Trans-Abdominal Pre-Peritoneal (TAPP) to Open Repair Surgery With a 3-Year Follow-Up.原发性单纯性腹股沟疝的慢性疼痛与不适:一项比较经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与开放式修补手术并进行3年随访的前瞻性研究。
Surg Technol Int. 2020 May 28;36:119-123.
5
Long-term outcome and chronic pain in atraumatic fibrin glue versus staple fixation of extra light titanized meshes in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP): a single-center experience.在腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)中,使用无创伤性纤维蛋白胶与钉合固定超轻钛化网比较的长期结果和慢性疼痛:单中心经验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 May;34(5):1929-1938. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06965-x. Epub 2019 Jul 12.
6
Open versus laparoscopic mesh repair of primary unilateral uncomplicated inguinal hernia: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.开放式与腹腔镜网片修补原发性单侧单纯腹股沟疝的比较:系统评价与荟萃分析及试验序贯分析。
Hernia. 2019 Jun;23(3):461-472. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01989-7. Epub 2019 Jun 3.
7
Is young age a risk factor for chronic postoperative inguinal pain after endoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair?年轻是否是内镜完全腹膜外(TEP)修补术后慢性腹股沟术后疼痛的危险因素?
Hernia. 2019 Dec;23(6):1053-1059. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-01882-3. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
8
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
9
Transabdominal Preperitoneal (TAPP) versus Lichtenstein operation for primary inguinal hernia repair - A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)与李金斯坦手术治疗原发性腹股沟疝修补术的比较——一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Surg. 2017 May 10;17(1):55. doi: 10.1186/s12893-017-0253-7.
10
Effectivity of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TAPP) in daily clinical practice: early and long-term result.腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术(TAPP)在日常临床实践中的有效性:早期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Nov;30(11):4985-4994. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4843-8. Epub 2016 Mar 16.