Jelinek Lena, Arlt Sönke, Moritz Steffen, Schröder Johanna, Westermann Stefan, Cludius Barbara
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Evangelical Hospital Alsterdorf, Hamburg, Germany.
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Mar 26;22(3):e15312. doi: 10.2196/15312.
Web-based interventions have been shown to be effective for the treatment of depression. However, interventions are often complex and include a variety of elements, making it difficult to identify the most effective component(s).
The aim of this pilot study was to shed light on mechanisms in the online treatment of depression by comparing a single-module, fully automated intervention for depression (internet-based behavioral activation [iBA]) to a nonoverlapping active control intervention and a nonactive control group.
We assessed 104 people with at least mild depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9, >4) via the internet at baseline (t) and 2 weeks (t) and 4 weeks (t) later. After the t assessment, participants were randomly allocated to one of three groups: (1) iBA (n=37), (2) active control using a brief internet-based mindfulness intervention (iMBI, n=32), or (3) care as usual (CAU, n=35). The primary outcome was improvement in depressive symptoms, as measured using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. Secondary parameters included changes in activity, dysfunctional attitudes, and quality of life.
While groups did not differ regarding the change in depression from t to t (η=.007, P=.746) or t to t (η=.008, P=.735), iBA was associated with a larger decrease in dysfunctional attitudes from t to t in comparison to CAU (η=.053, P=.04) and a larger increase in activity from t to t than the pooled control groups (η=.060, P=.02). A change in depression from t to t was mediated by a change in activity from t to t. At t, 22% (6/27) of the participants in the iBA group and 12% (3/25) of the participants in the iMBI group indicated that they did not use the intervention.
Although we did not find support for the short-term efficacy of the single-module iBA regarding depression, long-term effects are still conceivable, potentially initiated by changes in secondary outcomes. Future studies should use a longer intervention and follow-up interval.
DKRS (#DRKS00011562).
基于网络的干预措施已被证明对抑郁症治疗有效。然而,干预措施通常较为复杂,包含多种元素,因此难以确定最有效的组成部分。
本试点研究旨在通过比较针对抑郁症的单模块、全自动干预措施(基于互联网的行为激活[iBA])与不重叠的积极对照干预措施及非积极对照组,来阐明在线治疗抑郁症的机制。
我们通过互联网在基线(t0)、2周后(t1)和4周后(t2)对104名至少有轻度抑郁症状的人(患者健康问卷-9得分>4)进行了评估。在t0评估后,参与者被随机分配到三组中的一组:(1)iBA组(n = 37),(2)使用简短的基于互联网的正念干预措施的积极对照组(iMBI,n = 32),或(3)常规护理组(CAU,n = 35)。主要结局是使用患者健康问卷-9评估的抑郁症状改善情况。次要参数包括活动、功能失调性态度和生活质量的变化。
虽然各组在从t0到t1(η = 0.007,P = 0.746)或从t0到t2(η = 0.008,P = 0.735)的抑郁变化方面没有差异,但与CAU组相比,iBA组在从t0到t1的功能失调性态度下降幅度更大(η = 0.053,P = 0.04),且从t0到t2的活动增加幅度比合并后的对照组更大(η = 0.060,P = 0.02)。从t0到t2的抑郁变化是由从t0到t1的活动变化介导的。在t2时,iBA组22%(6/27)的参与者和iMBI组12%(3/25)的参与者表示他们未使用干预措施。
虽然我们没有找到支持单模块iBA对抑郁症短期疗效的证据,但长期效果仍有可能,可能由次要结局的变化引发。未来的研究应采用更长的干预和随访时间间隔。
DKRS(#DRKS00011562)。