Suppr超能文献

低预后营养指数预示接受放化疗的IIIB期非小细胞肺癌患者临床结局不佳。

Low Prognostic Nutritional Index Predicts Poor Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Stage IIIB Non-small-cell Lung Carcinoma Undergoing Chemoradiotherapy.

作者信息

Ozdemir Yurday, Topkan Erkan, Mertsoylu Huseyin, Selek Ugur

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.

Department of Medical Oncology, Baskent University Medical Faculty, Adana, Turkey.

出版信息

Cancer Manag Res. 2020 Mar 16;12:1959-1967. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S248034. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the prognostic utility of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in stage IIIB non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

A total of 358 stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received a total dose of 60-66 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy and ≥1 cycle(s) of platinum-based chemotherapy were analyzed. The receiver operating curve analysis was utilized to identify the optimal PNI cut-off value demonstrating a significant connection with the overall survival (OS), locoregional progression-free survival (LRPFS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

At a median follow-up time of 22.5 months (range: 2.4-123.5), 30.2% and 14% of the patients were still alive and free of disease progression, respectively.The median OS, LRPFS, and PFS were 25.2 [95% confidence interval (CI): 36.3-46.6 months], 15.4 (95% CI: 26.6-35.3 months), and 10.7 (95% CI: 36.8-69.9 months), individually, for the whole study accomplice. The ROC analysis revealed an optimum rounded cut-off that associated meaningfully with each of the OS [area under the curve (AUC): 84.1%; sensitivity: 75.9%;72.4% specificity], LRPFS (AUC: 92.4%; sensitivity: 87.9%; 85.1% specificity), and PFS (AUC: 80.1%; sensitivity: 73.7%; 71.6% specificity) at a value of 40.5. Comparative analyses revealed that the patients presenting with PNI≤40.5 had significantly inferior OS (16.8 vs 36.7; P<0.001), LRPFS (11.5 vs 19.5; P<0.001), and PFS (8.6 vs 13.6; P<0.001) outcomes compared to patients with PNI>40.5. In univariate analyses, lower T-stage (1-2 vs 3-4; P< 0.001), lower N-stage (N2 vs N3; P< 0.001), anemia status (absent vs present; P< 0.001), weight loss status (<5% vs ≥5%; P< 0.001), and PNI group (≤40.5 vs >40.5; P<0.001) were the factors found to be associated with OS, LRPFS and PFS results. The results of multivariate analysis exhibited that the PNI was independently associated with each of the OS (P<0.001), LRPFS (P<0.001), and PFS (P<0.001) outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The pretreatment PNI appears to be a robust novel prognostic factor that stratifies patients with stage IIIB NSCLC into two significantly distinct survival groups after CRT.

摘要

目的

探讨预后营养指数(PNI)在接受同步放化疗(CRT)的IIIB期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者中的预后价值。

方法

分析了358例接受总剂量60 - 66 Gy(2 Gy/分次)放疗和≥1周期铂类化疗的IIIB期NSCLC患者。采用受试者工作特征曲线分析来确定与总生存期(OS)、局部区域无进展生存期(LRPFS)和无进展生存期(PFS)有显著关联的最佳PNI临界值。

结果

在中位随访时间22.5个月(范围:2.4 - 123.5个月)时,分别有30.2%和14%的患者仍存活且无疾病进展。整个研究队列的中位OS、LRPFS和PFS分别为25.2[95%置信区间(CI):36.3 - 46.6个月]、15.4(95% CI:26.6 - 35.3个月)和10.7(95% CI:36.8 - 69.9个月)。ROC分析显示,在PNI值为40.5时,与OS[曲线下面积(AUC):84.1%;敏感度:75.9%;特异度:72.4%]、LRPFS(AUC:92.4%;敏感度:87.9%;特异度:85.1%)和PFS(AUC:80.1%;敏感度:73.7%;特异度:71.6%)均有显著相关性的最佳临界值。比较分析显示,PNI≤40.5的患者与PNI>40.5的患者相比,OS(16.8对36.7;P<0.001)、LRPFS(11.5对19.5;P<0.001)和PFS(8.6对13.6;P<0.001)结果显著更差。在单因素分析中,较低的T分期(1 - 2期对3 - 4期;P<0.001)、较低的N分期(N2期对N3期;P<0.001)、贫血状态(无对有;P<0.001)、体重减轻状态(<5%对≥5%;P<0.001)以及PNI分组(≤40.5对>40.5;P<0.001)是与OS、LRPFS和PFS结果相关的因素。多因素分析结果显示,PNI与OS(P<0.001)、LRPFS(P<0.001)和PFS(P<0.001)结果均独立相关。

结论

治疗前PNI似乎是一个强有力的新预后因素,可将IIIB期NSCLC患者在CRT后分为两个显著不同的生存组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验