Dale Timothy D, Watts Phillip C, Jones David, Pounder Kieran, Everest David J, Begon Michael E, Chantrey Julian
1Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB UK.
2Department of Ecology, University of Oulu, 90014 Oulu, Finland.
Eur J Wildl Res. 2016;62(5):589-599. doi: 10.1007/s10344-016-1031-z. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Rapid development in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology has revolutionised the speed and accuracy of many diagnostic assays. However, comparatively few wildlife epidemiological studies use quantitative PCR (qPCR) for pathogen detection, even fewer employ an internal control, to ensure confidence in negative results, and PCR's ability to multiplex and therefore detect several targets in a single reaction is underutilised. Here, we describe the development of two multiplex qPCR assays for the red and grey squirrel that detect the pathogens squirrelpox virus (SQPV) and adenovirus in squirrels (SADV), both of which cause mortality in the red squirrel. Both assays use a section of the squirrel phosphoglycerate kinase gene as an endogenous internal control that identifies and compensates for both, inadequate sampling or PCR inhibition. Tests on infected squirrel tissue demonstrate that simple swab samples (particularly from distal antebrachial skin) are sufficient to detect and identify the relative quantity of SQPV DNA in both squirrel species, while rectal swabs and blood cell pellets can be used to reliably indicate SADV infection. These assays are sensitive and specific with an endogenous internal control providing confidence in negative results and allowing comparison across laboratories. Using such assays should prove advantageous in wildlife studies with limited resources while allowing the maximum data yield.
聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术的快速发展彻底改变了许多诊断检测的速度和准确性。然而,相对较少的野生动物流行病学研究使用定量PCR(qPCR)进行病原体检测,更少的研究采用内部对照以确保对阴性结果的可信度,而且PCR的多重检测能力,即能够在单一反应中检测多个目标,也未得到充分利用。在此,我们描述了针对红松鼠和灰松鼠开发的两种多重qPCR检测方法,它们可检测松鼠痘病毒(SQPV)和松鼠腺病毒(SADV)这两种病原体,这两种病原体都会导致红松鼠死亡。两种检测方法均使用松鼠磷酸甘油酸激酶基因的一段序列作为内源性内部对照,以识别并补偿采样不足或PCR抑制的情况。对感染松鼠组织的检测表明,简单的拭子样本(特别是来自前臂远端皮肤的样本)足以检测和鉴定两种松鼠物种中SQPV DNA的相对数量,而直肠拭子和血细胞沉淀可用于可靠地指示SADV感染。这些检测方法灵敏且特异,内源性内部对照为阴性结果提供了可信度,并允许在不同实验室之间进行比较。在资源有限的野生动物研究中使用此类检测方法应具有优势,同时能获得最大的数据产出。