F.M. Kirby Neurobiology Center, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Program in Neuroscience, Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States.
Elife. 2020 Mar 27;9:e53803. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53803.
Assessing the imminence of threatening events using environmental cues enables proactive engagement of appropriate avoidance responses. The neural processes employed to anticipate event occurrence depend upon which cue properties are used to formulate predictions. In serial compound stimulus (SCS) conditioning in mice, repeated presentations of sequential tone (CS1) and white noise (CS2) auditory stimuli immediately prior to an aversive event (US) produces freezing and flight responses to CS1 and CS2, respectively (Fadok et al., 2017). Recent work reported that these responses reflect learned temporal relationships of CS1 and CS2 to the US (Dong et al., 2019). However, we find that frequency and sound pressure levels, not temporal proximity to the US, are the key factors underlying SCS-driven conditioned responses. Moreover, white noise elicits greater physiological and behavioral responses than tones even prior to conditioning. Thus, stimulus salience is the primary determinant of behavior in the SCS paradigm, and represents a potential confound in experiments utilizing multiple sensory stimuli.
利用环境线索评估威胁事件的迫近程度,可以使人们主动做出适当的回避反应。用于预测事件发生的神经过程取决于用于制定预测的线索属性。在小鼠的序列复合刺激(SCS)条件作用中,在厌恶事件(US)之前立即重复呈现顺序的音调(CS1)和白噪声(CS2)听觉刺激,分别会引起 CS1 和 CS2 的冻结和逃避反应(Fadok 等人,2017)。最近的研究报告称,这些反应反映了 CS1 和 CS2 与 US 之间习得的时间关系(Dong 等人,2019)。然而,我们发现,频率和声音压力水平,而不是与 US 的时间接近程度,是 SCS 驱动的条件反应的关键因素。此外,即使在条件作用之前,白噪声也会引起比音调更大的生理和行为反应。因此,刺激显著性是 SCS 范式中行为的主要决定因素,并且在利用多种感觉刺激的实验中代表潜在的混杂因素。