• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

静态计算机辅助种植手术是否存在学习曲线?一项前瞻性临床研究。

Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study.

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, School of Dentistry, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;49(10):1335-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 23.

DOI:10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.007
PMID:32217033
Abstract

Static computer-assisted surgery (s-CAS) has been introduced to improve the results of implantology. A prospective cohort study was conducted following the STROBE guidelines to determine the presence of a learning curve in s-CAS. Six partially and six totally edentulous patients were treated by two surgeons experienced in implantology but completely inexperienced in s-CAS. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography scans were matched to assess coronal, apical, and angular deviation and the positioning error. The accuracy data were used to evaluate the learning curve. Fifty-six implants were inserted. In partially and totally edentulous patients, the mean (range; standard deviation) coronal deviation was 0.87 (0.34-1.27; 0.35) and 1.24 (0.72-2.67; 0.79); the mean apical deviation was 1.13 (0.48-1.63; 0.39) and 1.52 (0.88-3.84; 1.15); the mean angular deviation was 2.63 (1.89-4.50; 0.98) and 3.59 (1.69-6.30; 1.65); and the mean positioning error was 0.80 (0.32-1.25; 0.35) and 1.14 (0.35-2.56; 0.77), respectively. A typical 'learning curve' effect was not identified for s-CAS.

摘要

静态计算机辅助手术(s-CAS)已被引入以改善种植体学的结果。本研究按照 STROBE 指南进行了前瞻性队列研究,以确定 s-CAS 是否存在学习曲线。由两位具有丰富种植体经验但完全没有 s-CAS 经验的外科医生对六名部分和六名完全无牙患者进行了治疗。对术前和术后计算机断层扫描进行匹配,以评估冠向、根尖和角向偏差以及定位误差。准确性数据用于评估学习曲线。共植入 56 个种植体。在部分和完全无牙患者中,冠向偏差的平均值(范围;标准差)分别为 0.87(0.34-1.27;0.35)和 1.24(0.72-2.67;0.79);根尖偏差的平均值分别为 1.13(0.48-1.63;0.39)和 1.52(0.88-3.84;1.15);角向偏差的平均值分别为 2.63(1.89-4.50;0.98)和 3.59(1.69-6.30;1.65);定位误差的平均值分别为 0.80(0.32-1.25;0.35)和 1.14(0.35-2.56;0.77)。s-CAS 未出现典型的“学习曲线”效应。

相似文献

1
Is there a learning curve in static computer-assisted implant surgery? A prospective clinical study.静态计算机辅助种植手术是否存在学习曲线?一项前瞻性临床研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020 Oct;49(10):1335-1342. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2020.03.007. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
2
Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.计算机辅助口腔种植手术的准确性:一项临床与影像学研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2009 Mar-Apr;24(2):234-42.
3
The accuracy of implant placement with computer-guided surgery in partially edentulous patients and possible influencing factors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.计算机引导手术在部分无牙颌患者中种植体植入精度及可能的影响因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Prosthodont Res. 2022 Jan 11;66(1):29-39. doi: 10.2186/jpr.JPR_D_20_00184. Epub 2021 Jan 26.
4
A clinically relevant accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the edentulous maxilla using mucosa-supported surgical templates.一种使用黏膜支持式手术模板的无牙颌上颌骨中计算机规划种植体植入的临床相关准确性研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Apr;17(2):343-52. doi: 10.1111/cid.12112. Epub 2013 Jul 24.
5
Does a fully digital workflow improve the accuracy of computer-assisted implant surgery in partially edentulous patients? A systematic review of clinical trials.全数字化工作流程是否能提高部分缺牙患者计算机辅助种植手术的准确性?一项临床试验的系统评价。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2020 Dec;22(6):660-671. doi: 10.1111/cid.12937. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
Comparison of the accuracy of dental implant placement using static and dynamic computer-assisted systems: an in vitro study.静态和动态计算机辅助系统在牙种植体植入精度方面的比较:一项体外研究。
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2021 Sep;122(4):343-348. doi: 10.1016/j.jormas.2020.11.008. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
7
Accuracy and complications of computer-designed selective laser sintering surgical guides for flapless dental implant placement and immediate definitive prosthesis installation.无牙颌种植即刻修复中应用计算机设计选择性激光烧结导板的准确性和并发症。
J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):410-9. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110115. Epub 2011 Aug 5.
8
The accuracy of static computer-aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.静态计算机辅助种植手术的准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018 Oct;29 Suppl 16:416-435. doi: 10.1111/clr.13346.
9
Influence of implant macrodesign and insertion connection technology on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.种植体宏观设计和植入连接技术对静态计算机辅助种植手术精度的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):1073-1079. doi: 10.1111/cid.12836. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
10
Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.术者经验对应用立体光刻手术模板种植体植入精度的影响:一项体外研究。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Apr;109(4):248-54. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60053-0.

引用本文的文献

1
Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Educational Strategies.计算机辅助种植手术:对教学、学习和教育策略的影响
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2025 Aug;11(4):e70197. doi: 10.1002/cre2.70197.
2
Inferior Alveolar Nerve Impairment Following Third-Molar Extraction: Management of Complications and Medicolegal Considerations.拔除第三磨牙后下牙槽神经损伤:并发症的处理及法医学考量
J Clin Med. 2025 Mar 29;14(7):2349. doi: 10.3390/jcm14072349.
3
Influence of template design on the accuracy of static computer-assisted implant surgery.
模板设计对静态计算机辅助种植手术准确性的影响。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2025 Feb;17(1):22-35. doi: 10.4047/jap.2025.17.1.22. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
4
Training outcomes of novice clinicians in the use of dynamic computer assisted implant surgery: A prospective comparative study.新手临床医生使用动态计算机辅助种植手术的培训效果:一项前瞻性比较研究。
J Dent Sci. 2024 Dec;19(Suppl 2):S122-S127. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.07.018. Epub 2024 Jul 31.
5
Influence of dental implant clinical experience on the accuracy of robot-assisted immediate implant placement: an in vitro study.种植体临床经验对机器人辅助即刻种植精度的影响:一项体外研究。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Sep 5;28(9):515. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05890-1.
6
High-precision all-in-one dual robotic arm strategy in oral implant surgery.口腔种植手术中的高精度一体化双机器人手臂策略
BDJ Open. 2024 Jun 3;10(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41405-024-00231-6.
7
Accuracy of implant placement with computer-aided static, dynamic, and robot-assisted surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials.计算机辅助静态、动态和机器人辅助手术中植入物放置的准确性:临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Mar 21;24(1):359. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04033-y.
8
Accuracy and Self-Confidence Level of Freehand Drilling and Dynamic Navigation System of Dental Implants: An In Vitro Study.牙种植体徒手钻孔与动态导航系统的准确性和自信水平:一项体外研究。
Cureus. 2023 Nov 29;15(11):e49618. doi: 10.7759/cureus.49618. eCollection 2023 Nov.
9
Accuracy Analysis of Computer-Assisted and Guided Dental Implantology by Comparing 3D Planning Data and Actual Implant Placement in a Mandibular Training Model: A Monocentric Comparison between Dental Students and Trained Implantologists.通过比较下颌骨训练模型中的三维规划数据和实际种植体植入情况对计算机辅助和引导式牙种植学进行准确性分析:牙科学生与训练有素的种植学家的单中心比较
J Pers Med. 2023 Jun 24;13(7):1037. doi: 10.3390/jpm13071037.
10
Can computer-guided surgery help orthodontics in miniscrew insertion and corticotomies? A narrative review.计算机辅助手术能否助力正畸中的微螺钉植入和皮质切开术?一项叙述性综述。
Front Oral Health. 2023 May 31;4:1196813. doi: 10.3389/froh.2023.1196813. eCollection 2023.