Suppr超能文献

忧郁型与非忧郁型重度抑郁症比较。

Melancholic versus Nonmelancholic Major Depression Compared.

机构信息

International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorders Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States; Lucio Bini Mood Disorders Centers, Cagliari and Rome, Italy.

International Consortium for Mood & Psychotic Disorders Research, McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA, United States; Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University School of Medicine, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2020 Apr 1;266:760-765. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.139. Epub 2020 Jan 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The concept of melancholia has been associated with psychiatric nosology for centuries. Nevertheless, its definition, relationship to the contemporary concept of Major Depressive Disorder, and clinical implications remain uncertain.

METHODS

In a total sample of 3211 closely evaluated patient-subjects diagnosed with DSM-5 Major Depressive or Bipolar Disorder and meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depression with melancholic features or not at a European mood disorder center, we matched 1833 for depression severity (baseline HDRS score ≥18) and compared rates and ratings of characteristics of interest between the subgroups, using bivariate and multivariate methods.

RESULTS

Observed prevalence of melancholic features was 35.2% in the 1833 subjects matched for severity, and 21.0% among all 3211 subjects. Diagnosis was highly dependent on depression-severity measured three ways. Very few clinical characteristics differed between melancholic and nonmelancholic subjects matched for illness-severity; more suicidal ideation with melancholic features was a notable exception.

CONCLUSIONS

Study findings leave the distinction of melancholic features from depression-severity unclear and the potential clinical value of diagnosing melancholic features uncertain.

摘要

背景

几个世纪以来,忧郁症的概念一直与精神病学的分类学有关。然而,其定义、与当代重性抑郁障碍概念的关系以及临床意义仍不确定。

方法

在一个欧洲心境障碍中心,对符合 DSM-5 重性抑郁或双相障碍诊断标准且符合 DSM-5 重性抑郁伴有忧郁特征或不伴有忧郁特征的诊断标准的 3211 例经过仔细评估的患者进行了总样本研究,我们对 1833 例抑郁严重程度(基线 HDRS 评分≥18)进行了匹配,并使用双变量和多变量方法比较了亚组之间感兴趣特征的发生率和评分。

结果

在严重程度匹配的 1833 例患者中,观察到忧郁特征的患病率为 35.2%,在所有 3211 例患者中为 21.0%。诊断高度依赖于三种方法测量的抑郁严重程度。在严重程度匹配的忧郁症和非忧郁症患者中,很少有临床特征存在差异;忧郁特征的自杀意念更多,这是一个显著的例外。

结论

研究结果表明,忧郁特征与抑郁严重程度的区别尚不清楚,忧郁特征诊断的潜在临床价值也不确定。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验