• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

执业助理医师进行的结肠镜筛查的质量指标。

Quality metrics of screening colonoscopies performed by PAs.

作者信息

Fejleh M Phillip, Shen Ching-Chieh, Chen Jacqueline, Bushong Joseph A, Dieckgraefe Brian K, Sayuk Gregory S

机构信息

M. Phillip Fejleh is a gastroenterology fellow at the University of California at Los Angeles. At Washington University in St. Louis, Mo., Ching-Chieh Shen is an internal medicine resident and Jacqueline Chen is a gastroenterology fellow. Joseph A. Bushong is a PA endoscopist at the St. Louis (Mo.) Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Brian K. Dieckgraefe is an associate professor of medicine at Washington University and practices at St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Gregory S. Sayuk is an associate professor of medicine and psychiatry at Washington University and practices at St. Louis Veterans Affairs Medical Center. The authors have disclosed no potential conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise.

出版信息

JAAPA. 2020 Apr;33(4):43-48. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000657192.96190.ab.

DOI:10.1097/01.JAA.0000657192.96190.ab
PMID:32217907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many communities face a shortage of qualified endoscopists. Training physician assistants (PAs) to perform colonoscopies can expand the availability of colorectal cancer screening. This study examined screening colonoscopy metrics and quality indicators among gastroenterologists, supervised PAs, and gastroenterology fellows.

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing average-risk screening colonoscopy were stratified into one of three groups by endoscopist type. Procedure and pathology reports were reviewed for the technical performance and quality metrics of the providers.

RESULTS

PAs performed comparably to gastroenterologists in technical performance and quality metrics, and demonstrated higher cecal intubation rates than their gastroenterologist colleagues. Comparisons of attending physicians and PAs grouped by years of experience also did not show notable differences in performance.

CONCLUSIONS

In a supervised practice, PAs performed on par with their gastroenterology colleagues on established colonoscopy quality indicators. Following proper training, PAs can be employed in the provision of screening colonoscopy.

摘要

背景

许多社区面临合格内镜医师短缺的问题。培训医师助理(PA)进行结肠镜检查可扩大结直肠癌筛查的可及性。本研究调查了胃肠病学家、受监督的医师助理和胃肠病学住院医师的筛查结肠镜检查指标和质量指标。

方法

接受平均风险筛查结肠镜检查的连续患者按内镜医师类型分为三组之一。审查了操作和病理报告以评估提供者的技术操作和质量指标。

结果

医师助理在技术操作和质量指标方面与胃肠病学家表现相当,并且其盲肠插管率高于胃肠病学同事。按经验年限分组的主治医师和医师助理的比较在操作方面也未显示出显著差异。

结论

在受监督的实践中,医师助理在既定的结肠镜检查质量指标方面与胃肠病学同事表现相当。经过适当培训后,医师助理可受聘进行筛查结肠镜检查。

相似文献

1
Quality metrics of screening colonoscopies performed by PAs.执业助理医师进行的结肠镜筛查的质量指标。
JAAPA. 2020 Apr;33(4):43-48. doi: 10.1097/01.JAA.0000657192.96190.ab.
2
Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).免疫化学粪便潜血试验在结直肠癌筛查项目中结肠镜检查的质量:EQuIPE 研究(评估内镜性能质量指标)。
Gut. 2015 Sep;64(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-307954. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
3
Fellowship Colonoscopy Training and Preparedness for Independent Gastroenterology Practice.结肠镜检查 fellowship 培训与独立胃肠病学实践准备
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2016 Jan;50(1):45-51. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000376.
4
Factors to Improve Endoscopic Screening for Colorectal Cancer.提高结直肠癌内镜筛查效果的因素。
J Gastrointest Cancer. 2021 Mar;52(1):289-293. doi: 10.1007/s12029-020-00402-2.
5
High quality of screening colonoscopy in Austria is not dependent on endoscopist specialty or setting.在奥地利,高质量的结肠镜筛查并不取决于内镜医师的专业或检查地点。
Endoscopy. 2015 Mar;47(3):207-16. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1390910. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
6
Comparisons of screening colonoscopy performed by a nurse practitioner and gastroenterologists: a single-center randomized controlled trial.执业护士与胃肠病学家进行的筛查结肠镜检查比较:一项单中心随机对照试验
Gastroenterol Nurs. 2011 May-Jun;34(3):210-6. doi: 10.1097/SGA.0b013e31821ab5e6.
7
Gender Differences in Colonoscopy: Implications for Clinical Practice and Female Gastroenterologists.结肠镜检查中的性别差异:对临床实践及女性胃肠病学家的启示
Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Mar;67(3):810-816. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07079-y. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
8
Delivering colonoscopy screening for low-income populations in Suffolk County: strategies, outcomes, and benchmarks.在萨福克县为低收入人群提供结肠镜筛查:策略、结果和基准。
Cancer. 2013 Aug 1;119 Suppl 15:2842-8. doi: 10.1002/cncr.28160.
9
Screening colonoscopy: High quality regardless of endoscopist specialty.结肠镜筛查:无论内镜医生的专业如何,都能保证高质量。
Am J Surg. 2019 Mar;217(3):442-444. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.09.009. Epub 2018 Sep 21.
10
Should Assessment of Quality Indicator of Colonoscopy Be Varied Depending on the Colonoscopic Technique Level?结肠镜检查质量指标的评估是否应根据结肠镜检查技术水平而有所不同?
Dig Dis Sci. 2016 Mar;61(3):731-6. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3954-8. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of physician assistants on quality of care: rapid review.医师助理对医疗质量的影响:快速综述
BMJ. 2025 Jul 3;390:e086358. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2025-086358.
2
Trends in and factors associated with family physician-performed screening colonoscopies in the United States: 2016-2021.2016 - 2021年美国家庭医生进行结肠镜筛查的趋势及相关因素
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12858. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12858. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
3
Gastroenterologist focus of clinical practice affects adenoma detection in screening colonoscopy.胃肠病学家的临床实践重点影响筛查结肠镜检查中的腺瘤检出率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 May 19;102(20):e33818. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033818.
4
The cost-effectiveness of physician assistants/associates: A systematic review of international evidence.医师助理/医师助手的成本效益:国际证据的系统评价。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 1;16(11):e0259183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259183. eCollection 2021.