Suppr超能文献

下背部干扰电流应用时的心率变异性监测:一项横断面研究。

Heart Rate Variability Monitoring during Interferential Current Application in the Lower Back Area: A Cross-Sectional Study.

机构信息

Department of Physiotherapy, University of Seville, Avicena Street, 41009 Seville, Spain.

Facultad de Fisioterapia y Enfermería, Departamento de Enfermería, Universidad de Castilla la Mancha, 45071 Toledo, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3394. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073394.

Abstract

Vasovagal reactions may occur occasionally during electrical stimulation using interferential current (IFC). The purpose of this study was to examine variations in autonomic activity during the application of IFC in asymptomatic participants by analysis of their heart rate variability (HRV). Seventy-three male volunteers were randomly assigned to a placebo group ( = 36; HRV was documented for 10 min, both at rest and during a placebo intervention) and an intervention group ( = 37; HRV was documented for 10 min in two conditions labelled as (1) rest and (2) application of IFC technique on the lumbar segment). The diameters of the Poincaré plot (SD1, SD2), stress score (SS), and the ratio between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity (S/PS) were measured. After interventions, differences amongst the placebo group and the IFC group were found in SD2 ( < 0.001), SS ( = 0.01) and S/PS ratio ( = 0.003). The IFC technique was associated with increased parasympathetic modulation, which could induce a vasovagal reaction. Monitorization of adverse reactions should be implemented during the application of IFC technique. HRV indicators might have a part in prevention of vasovagal reactions. Further studies in patients with lumbar pain are needed to explore possible differences in HRV responses due to the presence of chronic pain.

摘要

血管迷走性反应偶尔可能会在使用干扰电流(IFC)进行电刺激时发生。本研究的目的是通过分析无症状参与者的心率变异性(HRV),来检查在应用 IFC 时自主活动的变化。73 名男性志愿者被随机分为安慰剂组(n = 36;记录了 10 分钟的 HRV,分别在休息时和安慰剂干预时)和干预组(n = 37;在两种情况下记录了 10 分钟的 HRV,分别标记为(1)休息和(2)在腰部应用 IFC 技术)。测量了 Poincaré 图的直径(SD1、SD2)、应激评分(SS)和交感神经与副交感神经活动比(S/PS)。干预后,安慰剂组和 IFC 组之间在 SD2(<0.001)、SS(=0.01)和 S/PS 比值(=0.003)方面存在差异。IFC 技术与副交感神经调节增加有关,这可能会引起血管迷走性反应。在应用 IFC 技术时,应进行不良反应监测。HRV 指标可能在预防血管迷走性反应方面发挥作用。需要对患有腰痛的患者进行进一步研究,以探讨由于慢性疼痛的存在,HRV 反应可能存在的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c53/8036980/3c2366b35b45/ijerph-18-03394-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验