Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR.
University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Acad Emerg Med. 2020 May;27(5):366-374. doi: 10.1111/acem.13927. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
While emergency medical services (EMS) often use endotracheal intubation (ETI) or supraglottic airways (SGA), some patients receive only bag-valve-mask (BVM) ventilation during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA). Our objective was to compare patient characteristics and outcomes for BVM ventilation to advanced airway management (AAM) in adults with OHCA.
Using data from the Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial, we identified patients receiving AAM (ETI or a SGA), BVM ventilation only (BVM-only), and BVM ventilation as a rescue after at least one failed attempt at advanced airway placement (BVM-rescue). The outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), 72-hour survival, survival to hospital discharge, neurologically intact survival (Modified Rankin Scale ≤ 3), and the presence of aspiration on a chest radiograph. Comparisons were made using generalized mixed-effects models while adjusting for age, sex, initial rhythm, EMS-witnessed status, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, response time, study cluster, and advanced life support first on scene.
Of 3,004 patients enrolled, there were 282 BVM-only, 2,129 AAM, and 156 BVM-rescue patients with complete covariates. Shockable initial rhythms (34% vs. 18.6%) and EMS-witnessed arrests (21.6% vs. 11.3%) were more likely in BVM-only than AAM but similar between BVM-rescue and AAM. Compared to AAM, BVM-only patients had similar ROSC (odds ratio [OR] = 1.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.96 to 1.73), but higher 72-hour survival (OR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.42 to 2.69), survival to discharge (OR = 4.47, 95% CI = 3.03 to 6.59), and neurologically intact survival (OR = 7.05, 95% CI = 4.40 to 11.3). Compared to AAM, BVM-rescue patients had similar ROSC (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.47 to 1.12) and 72-hour survival (OR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.66 to 1.77) but higher survival to discharge (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.17 to 3.95) and neurologically intact survival (OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.20 to 5.81). Aspiration incidence was similar.
Bag-valve-mask-only ventilation is associated with improved OHCA outcomes. Despite similar rates of ROSC and 72-hour survival, BVM-rescue ventilation was associated with improved survival to discharge and neurologically intact survival compared to successful AAM.
虽然急救医疗服务(EMS)通常使用气管内插管(ETI)或声门上气道(SGA),但一些患者在院外心脏骤停(OHCA)期间仅接受球囊 - 面罩通气(BVM)。我们的目的是比较 BVM 通气与高级气道管理(AAM)在 OHCA 成人患者中的患者特征和结局。
使用 Pragmatic Airway Resuscitation Trial 的数据,我们确定了接受 AAM(ETI 或 SGA)、仅 BVM 通气(BVM-only)和至少一次高级气道放置失败后使用 BVM 通气作为抢救(BVM-rescue)的患者。结局是自主循环恢复(ROSC)、72 小时生存率、出院生存率、神经功能完整生存率(改良 Rankin 量表≤3)和胸片上存在误吸。使用广义混合效应模型进行比较,同时调整年龄、性别、初始节律、EMS 目击状态、旁观者心肺复苏、反应时间、研究聚类和现场首先进行高级生命支持。
在纳入的 3004 名患者中,有 282 名仅接受 BVM 通气、2129 名接受 AAM 和 156 名接受 BVM 抢救的患者具有完整的协变量。BVM-only 患者的可除颤初始节律(34%比 18.6%)和 EMS 目击的骤停(21.6%比 11.3%)比 AAM 更常见,但 BVM-rescue 与 AAM 之间相似。与 AAM 相比,BVM-only 患者的 ROSC 相似(优势比 [OR] = 1.29,95%置信区间 [CI] = 0.96 至 1.73),但 72 小时生存率(OR = 1.96,95% CI = 1.42 至 2.69)、出院生存率(OR = 4.47,95% CI = 3.03 至 6.59)和神经功能完整生存率(OR = 7.05,95% CI = 4.40 至 11.3)更高。与 AAM 相比,BVM-rescue 患者的 ROSC(OR = 0.73,95% CI = 0.47 至 1.12)和 72 小时生存率(OR = 1.08,95% CI = 0.66 至 1.77)相似,但出院生存率(OR = 2.15,95% CI = 1.17 至 3.95)和神经功能完整生存率(OR = 2.64,95% CI = 1.20 至 5.81)更高。误吸发生率相似。
BVM 仅通气与改善 OHCA 结局相关。尽管 ROSC 和 72 小时生存率相似,但与成功的 AAM 相比,BVM-rescue 通气与出院生存率和神经功能完整生存率的提高相关。