• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在一个新的融合活检项目中,磁共振成像-超声融合活检之前指定的PI-RADS v2评估类别的表现。

Performance of PI-RADS v2 assessment categories assigned prior to MR-US fusion biopsy in a new fusion biopsy program.

作者信息

Trent Graham P, Ye Nancy, Chopra Jasleen, Chen Rong, Wong-You-Cheong Jade, Naslund Michael, Siddiqui Mohummad M, Wnorowski Amelia

机构信息

University of Maryland School of Medicine, 655 W Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.

University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 22 South Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201, United States of America.

出版信息

Clin Imaging. 2020 Aug;64:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Mar 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.004
PMID:32220760
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To validate the performance of PI-RADS v2 for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPca, Gleason ≥7) within the context of a new fusion biopsy program.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with a PI-RADS v2 assessment category assigned on pre-biopsy mpMRI between March 2015 and November 2017 were identified. Diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 was calculated using fusion biopsy results as reference standard using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Patient and lesion characteristics were analyzed with one-way ANOVA and Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS

Of 83 patients with 175 lesions, 115/175 (65.7%) were benign, 21/175 (12%) were Gleason 6, and 39/175 (22.3%) were Gleason ≥7. csPCa rates were 0% (0/5) for PI-RADS 1, 7.4% (2/27) for PI-RADS 2, 5.8% (3/52) for PI-RADS 3, 31.2% (24/77) for PI-RADS 4, and 71.4% (10/14) for PI-RADS 5 (p < 0.0001). For prediction of csPCa, patient-level AUC was 0.68 and lesion-level AUC was 0.77. Biopsy threshold of PI-RADS ≥3 was 92.6% sensitive and 22.1% specific. A threshold of PI-RADS ≥4 was 87.2% sensitive and 58.1% specific. Rate of csPca detection on concurrent standard 12 core biopsy only was 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

PI-RADS v2 assessment categories assigned prior to biopsy predict pathologic outcome reasonably well in a new prostate fusion biopsy program. Biopsy threshold of PI-RADS ≥3 is highly sensitive. A threshold of ≥4 increases specificity but misses some csPCa.

摘要

目的

在一项新的融合活检计划背景下,验证PI-RADS v2检测临床显著前列腺癌(csPca,Gleason评分≥7)的性能。

材料与方法

确定2015年3月至2017年11月间在活检前mpMRI上被赋予PI-RADS v2评估类别的患者。以融合活检结果作为参考标准,采用受试者操作特征曲线分析计算PI-RADS v2的诊断性能。采用单因素方差分析和Wilcoxon秩和检验分析患者和病变特征。

结果

83例患者共175个病变,其中115/175(65.7%)为良性,21/175(12%)为Gleason 6级,39/175(22.3%)为Gleason≥7级。PI-RADS 1级的csPCa率为0%(0/5),PI-RADS 2级为7.4%(2/27),PI-RADS 3级为5.8%(3/52),PI-RADS 4级为31.2%(24/77),PI-RADS 5级为71.4%(10/14)(p<0.0001)。对于csPCa的预测,患者水平的AUC为0.68,病变水平的AUC为0.77。PI-RADS≥3的活检阈值敏感性为92.6%,特异性为22.1%。PI-RADS≥4的阈值敏感性为87.2%,特异性为58.1%。仅同时进行标准12针活检时csPca的检出率为6.7%。

结论

在新的前列腺融合活检计划中,活检前赋予的PI-RADS v2评估类别对病理结果的预测相当不错。PI-RADS≥3的活检阈值具有高度敏感性。≥4的阈值可提高特异性,但会遗漏一些csPCa。

相似文献

1
Performance of PI-RADS v2 assessment categories assigned prior to MR-US fusion biopsy in a new fusion biopsy program.在一个新的融合活检项目中,磁共振成像-超声融合活检之前指定的PI-RADS v2评估类别的表现。
Clin Imaging. 2020 Aug;64:29-34. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.03.004. Epub 2020 Mar 13.
2
Association Between Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Score for the Index Lesion and Multifocal, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)评分与指数病变和多灶性、临床显著前列腺癌的相关性。
Eur Urol Oncol. 2018 May;1(1):29-36. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.01.002. Epub 2018 May 15.
3
How to make clinical decisions to avoid unnecessary prostate screening in biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADs v2 score ≤ 3?如何在 PI-RADS v2 评分≤3 的初次活检无前列腺癌的男性中做出临床决策以避免不必要的前列腺筛查?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2020 Jan;25(1):175-186. doi: 10.1007/s10147-019-01524-9. Epub 2019 Aug 31.
4
Structured approach to resolving discordance between PI-RADS v2.1 score and targeted prostate biopsy results: an opportunity for quality improvement.采用结构化方法解决 PI-RADS v2.1 评分与靶向前列腺活检结果之间的差异:提高质量的机会。
Abdom Radiol (NY). 2022 Aug;47(8):2917-2927. doi: 10.1007/s00261-022-03562-w. Epub 2022 Jun 8.
5
Analysis of PI-RADS 4 cases: Management recommendations for negatively biopsied patients.PI-RADS 4 类病例分析:阴性穿刺活检患者的管理建议。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Apr;113:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.01.030. Epub 2019 Feb 1.
6
Assessment of PI-RADS v2 for the Detection of Prostate Cancer.前列腺影像报告和数据系统(PI-RADS)v2版在前列腺癌检测中的评估
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):726-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.011. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
7
Can the addition of clinical information improve the accuracy of PI-RADS version 2 for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in positive MRI?临床信息的加入能否提高 PI-RADS 版本 2 对 MRI 阳性中临床显著前列腺癌的诊断准确性?
Clin Radiol. 2020 Feb;75(2):157.e1-157.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.09.139. Epub 2019 Nov 2.
8
Comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and PI-RADS version 2.1 for the detection of transition zone prostate cancer.PI-RADS 版本 2 与 PI-RADS 版本 2.1 对移行区前列腺癌检测的比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2019 Dec;121:108704. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108704. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
9
Prospective PI-RADS v2.1 Atypical Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Nodules With Marked Restricted Diffusion: Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Multiparametric MRI.前瞻性 PI-RADS v2.1 伴显著弥散受限的不典型前列腺增生结节:多参数 MRI 检测临床显著前列腺癌。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2021 Aug;217(2):395-403. doi: 10.2214/AJR.20.24370. Epub 2020 Sep 2.
10
Development of a nomogram combining multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and PSA-related parameters to enhance the detection of clinically significant cancer across different region.开发一种结合多参数磁共振成像和前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)相关参数的列线图,以提高不同区域临床显著性癌症的检测率。
Prostate. 2022 Apr;82(5):556-565. doi: 10.1002/pros.24302. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Active Surveillance Strategies for Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Comparative Benefits and Cost-effectiveness.主动监测策略在低级别前列腺癌中的应用:比较效益和成本效益。
Radiology. 2021 Sep;300(3):594-604. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021204321. Epub 2021 Jul 13.