Georgetown-Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.
Hematology/Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Temple Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Mol Cancer Ther. 2020 Jun;19(6):1373-1382. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-19-0531. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
Patients with prostate cancer with tumors harboring defects in DNA-repair genes (DRD) generally do not respond well to AR-directed therapy. Furthermore, canonical pathways evolve during disease progression and may affect treatment with existing therapies. Due to the limited treatment options after failure of hormonal and taxane therapy, and the tumor heterogeneity induced by DRD, we sought to characterize the alterations in primary and metastatic prostate cancer. Tumors from 1,027 patients with advanced prostate cancer that underwent comprehensive genomic profiling for routine clinical care were reviewed to assess DRD mutation rates (27-gene panel) and co-occurring mutations in select canonical prostate cancer pathways. DRD alterations were identified in 20 genes and in 17% of patients (BRCA2 and ATM most common) occurring with slightly higher frequency in specimens from metastatic biopsy sites and men older than 50 years of age. Microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) and tumor mutational burden-high occurred with 3% frequency in the overall cohort but were not enriched in metastatic disease. Biomarkers previously associated with antitumor immunity are found at high frequencies in MSI-H patients, including JAK1 (68%) and PTEN (32%). Lastly, mutations in TP53, AR, PTEN, APC, CTNNB1, and PIK3CA were all significantly enriched in metastatic samples. We identified clinically significant subgroups of patients demonstrating (1) defects in DNA-repair pathways, (2) intrinsic prostate cancer signaling pathways that may prevent antitumor immunity, and (3) distinct genomic differences between localized and metastatic prostate cancer. These results lend support that genomic profiling for advanced prostate cancer may identify actionable targets not routinely used in the current metastatic paradigm.
携带有 DNA 修复基因 (DRD) 缺陷的前列腺癌患者通常对 AR 靶向治疗反应不佳。此外,在疾病进展过程中会出现经典途径,这可能会影响现有治疗方法的疗效。由于激素和紫杉烷治疗失败后治疗选择有限,以及 DRD 引起的肿瘤异质性,我们试图描述原发性和转移性前列腺癌的改变。对接受常规临床护理的 1027 例晚期前列腺癌患者进行全面基因组分析的肿瘤进行了回顾性评估,以评估 DRD 突变率(27 基因检测)和选择的经典前列腺癌途径中的共同突变。在 20 个基因中发现了 DRD 改变,在 17%的患者中(BRCA2 和 ATM 最常见),在转移性活检部位的标本和年龄大于 50 岁的男性中,DRD 改变的发生率略高。在整个队列中,微卫星不稳定性高(MSI-H)和肿瘤突变负担高的发生率为 3%,但在转移性疾病中并未富集。先前与抗肿瘤免疫相关的生物标志物在 MSI-H 患者中发现频率较高,包括 JAK1(68%)和 PTEN(32%)。最后,TP53、AR、PTEN、APC、CTNNB1 和 PIK3CA 的突变在转移性样本中均明显富集。我们确定了具有临床意义的患者亚组,这些患者表现出(1)DNA 修复途径缺陷,(2)可能阻止抗肿瘤免疫的内在前列腺癌信号通路,以及(3)局限性和转移性前列腺癌之间的明显基因组差异。这些结果支持对晚期前列腺癌进行基因组分析可以确定当前转移性范例中未常规使用的可操作靶标。