• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全市范围内的自行车共享系统对大学生主动交通的影响:一项随机对照试点研究。

The Effects of a Citywide Bike Share System on Active Transportation Among College Students: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

机构信息

University of Missouri-Kansas City, MO, USA.

出版信息

Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):412-418. doi: 10.1177/1090198120914244. Epub 2020 Mar 30.

DOI:10.1177/1090198120914244
PMID:32223340
Abstract

Despite the known health benefits of biking, within the last year, 46% of college students reported not riding a bike. This trend indicates a need to explore interventions to increase bicycling. The purpose of this study was to examine how a free membership to a citywide bike share system, with a campus docking station, affected bicycling and physical activity. Undergraduate students were recruited from a Midwest University to participate in this research study in spring 2018. Each participant wore an activity-tracking device for 3 weeks and was randomly assigned to either an intervention group ( = 29) or a control group ( = 27). Participants in the intervention group received a free 1-month membership to Kansas City's bike share system, B-cycle. Data on the type of activity (e.g., biking), the frequency, duration, and overall steps were collected. A pre- and posttest survey was developed and distributed to assess perceptions and use of bicycles and the bike share system. tests were performed to identify differences between the two groups. Data analyses reveal no significant differences in overall steps or increased biking behavior between the two groups. Furthermore, only two of participants who received a free bike share membership redeemed their membership. Among other barriers, risk of overage fees or not wanting to enter credit/debit card information emerged as major themes that deterred participants. Results from this study will inform future interventions to decrease barriers, increase physical activity, and increase the proportions of trips taken by bike among college students. More specifically, alternative payment methods should be explored to decrease the barriers observed.

摘要

尽管人们已知骑自行车对健康有益,但在过去一年中,仍有 46%的大学生表示不骑自行车。这一趋势表明,需要探索干预措施来增加骑自行车的人数。本研究旨在探讨城市范围内的自行车共享系统(设有校园停靠站)的免费会员资格如何影响骑自行车和身体活动。 2018 年春季,从一所中西部大学招募了本科生参与这项研究。每位参与者佩戴活动跟踪设备 3 周,并被随机分配到干预组(n=29)或对照组(n=27)。干预组的参与者获得了堪萨斯城自行车共享系统 B-cycle 的免费 1 个月会员资格。收集了活动类型(例如骑自行车)、频率、持续时间和总步数的数据。制定并分发了一份预测试和后测试调查,以评估对自行车和自行车共享系统的看法和使用情况。 进行了 检验以确定两组之间的差异。 数据分析显示,两组之间的总步数或骑自行车行为的增加没有显著差异。此外,只有两名获得免费自行车共享会员资格的参与者使用了他们的会员资格。除其他障碍外,超龄费风险或不愿输入信用卡/借记卡信息等问题成为阻止参与者的主要因素。 本研究的结果将为未来减少障碍、增加身体活动和增加大学生自行车出行比例的干预措施提供信息。更具体地说,应该探索替代支付方式来减少观察到的障碍。

相似文献

1
The Effects of a Citywide Bike Share System on Active Transportation Among College Students: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.全市范围内的自行车共享系统对大学生主动交通的影响:一项随机对照试点研究。
Health Educ Behav. 2020 Jun;47(3):412-418. doi: 10.1177/1090198120914244. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
2
Acute Effect of Virtual Reality Exercise Bike Games on College Students' Physiological and Psychological Outcomes.虚拟现实健身车游戏对大学生生理和心理结果的急性影响。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2017 Jul;20(7):453-457. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2017.0042.
3
Socio-Ecological Predictors of Frequent Bike Share Trips: Do Purposes Matter?社会生态因素对共享单车高频使用的预测作用:目的重要吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 20;17(20):7640. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207640.
4
Insights in Public Health: Initiating Bicycle Sharing in Hawai'i: Lessons Learned from a Small Pilot Bike Share Program.公共卫生洞察:在夏威夷启动共享单车项目:小型共享单车试点项目的经验教训
Hawaii J Med Public Health. 2015 Oct;74(10):348-51.
5
Evaluation of free-floating bike-share on a university campus using a multi-method approach.使用多方法途径对大学校园中的共享单车进行评估。
Prev Med Rep. 2019 Aug 28;16:100981. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.100981. eCollection 2019 Dec.
6
Increasing Active Transportation Through E-Bike Use: Pilot Study Comparing the Health Benefits, Attitudes, and Beliefs Surrounding E-Bikes and Conventional Bikes.通过使用电动自行车增加主动出行:一项比较电动自行车和传统自行车对健康益处、态度及信念的试点研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2018 Nov 29;4(4):e10461. doi: 10.2196/10461.
7
Preparing for bike-sharing: insight from focus groups and surveys, Chattanooga, Tennessee, 2010.为共享单车做准备:来自焦点小组和调查的见解,田纳西州查塔努加,2010年
Health Promot Pract. 2013 Jan;14(1):62-8. doi: 10.1177/1524839912447191. Epub 2012 Jul 5.
8
Bike Share Usage and the Built Environment: A Review.自行车共享使用与建成环境:综述。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 21;10:848169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.848169. eCollection 2022.
9
Bringing bike share to a low-income community: lessons learned through community engagement, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2011.将自行车共享引入低收入社区:明尼阿波利斯市(明尼苏达州)社区参与的经验教训,2011 年。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2013 Aug 15;10:E138. doi: 10.5888/pcd10.120274.
10
Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university.城市大学校园内共享单车使用情况的相关因素及其与体重状况的关联。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0270870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270870. eCollection 2022.

引用本文的文献

1
Correlates of bike share use and its association with weight status at an urban university.城市大学校园内共享单车使用情况的相关因素及其与体重状况的关联。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 3;17(8):e0270870. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270870. eCollection 2022.
2
Why Do Students Walk or Cycle for Transportation? Perceived Study Environment and Psychological Determinants as Predictors of Active Transportation by University Students.为什么学生选择步行或骑车出行?以大学生为研究对象,探究其对出行方式选择的感知学习环境和心理决定因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 3;18(4):1390. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18041390.