• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

本地社会政治事件对线上极右翼社区群体凝聚力的影响。

The effects of local socio-political events on group cohesion in online far-right communities.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Dundee, Dundee, United Kingdom.

Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2020 Mar 30;15(3):e0230302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230302. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0230302
PMID:32226045
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7105128/
Abstract

In recent years, the reach and influence of far-right ideologies have been extended through online communities with devastating effects in the real world. In this research, we examine how far-right online communities can be empowered by socio-political events that are significant to them. Using over 14 years of data extracted from an Australian national sub-forum of a global online white supremacist community, we investigate whether the group cohesion of the community is affected by local race riots. Our analysis shows that the online community, not only became more cohesive after the riots, but was also reinvigorated by highly active new members who joined during the week of the riots or soon after. These changes were maintained over the longer-term, highlighting pervasive ramifications of the local socio-political context for this white supremacist community. Pre-registered analyses of data extracted from other white supremacist online communities (in South Africa and the United Kingdom) show similar effects on some of the indicators of group cohesion, but of reduced magnitude, and not as enduring as the effects found in the context of the Australian far-right online community.

摘要

近年来,极右翼意识形态通过具有破坏性影响的网络社区扩大了其影响力和传播范围。在本研究中,我们考察了极右翼网络社区如何被对他们具有重要意义的社会政治事件所赋予权力。我们使用从一个全球性的白人至上主义网络社区的澳大利亚国家分论坛中提取的超过 14 年的数据,研究了社区的群体凝聚力是否受到当地种族骚乱的影响。我们的分析表明,该网络社区不仅在骚乱后变得更加团结,而且还受到在骚乱期间或之后一周内加入的高度活跃的新成员的激励。这些变化在较长时间内得以维持,突显了当地社会政治环境对这个白人至上主义社区的普遍影响。对从其他白人至上主义网络社区(南非和英国)提取的数据进行的预先注册分析显示,在一些群体凝聚力指标上也存在类似的影响,但程度较小,而且不如澳大利亚极右翼网络社区背景下的影响持久。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/6c901d923b52/pone.0230302.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/94902448ffa6/pone.0230302.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/9dd75edf9350/pone.0230302.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/63e581bc2821/pone.0230302.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/e501e664f4bc/pone.0230302.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/c6f511d99ff4/pone.0230302.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/989958bc853c/pone.0230302.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/6c901d923b52/pone.0230302.g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/94902448ffa6/pone.0230302.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/9dd75edf9350/pone.0230302.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/63e581bc2821/pone.0230302.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/e501e664f4bc/pone.0230302.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/c6f511d99ff4/pone.0230302.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/989958bc853c/pone.0230302.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5bd6/7105128/6c901d923b52/pone.0230302.g007.jpg

相似文献

1
The effects of local socio-political events on group cohesion in online far-right communities.本地社会政治事件对线上极右翼社区群体凝聚力的影响。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 30;15(3):e0230302. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230302. eCollection 2020.
2
Online social cohesion reflects real-world group action in Syria during the Arab Spring.网络社会凝聚力反映了阿拉伯之春期间叙利亚现实世界中的群体行动。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 16;16(7):e0254087. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254087. eCollection 2021.
3
Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms.量化在线平台中的社会组织与政治两极分化。
Nature. 2021 Dec;600(7888):264-268. doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04167-x. Epub 2021 Dec 1.
4
Tweeting From Left to Right: Is Online Political Communication More Than an Echo Chamber?从左到右发推文:网络政治交流是否不止是一个回音室?
Psychol Sci. 2015 Oct;26(10):1531-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594620. Epub 2015 Aug 21.
5
Finding uncommon ground: Extremist online forum engagement predicts integrative complexity.寻找共同点:极端主义在线论坛参与度预测整合复杂性。
PLoS One. 2021 Jan 19;16(1):e0245651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245651. eCollection 2021.
6
Online and Social Media Data As an Imperfect Continuous Panel Survey.在线和社交媒体数据作为一种不完美的连续面板调查。
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 5;11(1):e0145406. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0145406. eCollection 2016.
7
The class politics of prejudice: Brexit and the land of no-hope and glory.阶级偏见政治:英国脱欧与没有希望和荣耀之地。
Br J Sociol. 2017 Nov;68 Suppl 1:S265-S280. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12329.
8
Cohesion and Coalition Formation in the European Parliament: Roll-Call Votes and Twitter Activities.欧洲议会中的凝聚力与联盟形成:唱名表决与推特活动
PLoS One. 2016 Nov 11;11(11):e0166586. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166586. eCollection 2016.
9
Hashtags as signals of political identity: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.标签作为政治身份的信号:#BlackLivesMatter(黑人的命也是命)和#AllLivesMatter(所有人的命都是命)。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286524. eCollection 2023.
10
The New Right and family politics.新右派与家庭政治。
Econ Soc. 1992 May;21(2):93-128. doi: 10.1080/03085149200000006.

引用本文的文献

1
Online communities come with real-world consequences for individuals and societies.网络社区对个人和社会都有着现实世界的影响。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Aug 2;2(1):71. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00112-6.
2
Youth are united online to fight against involution: a study of group cohesion on Weibo.年轻人在网上团结起来对抗内卷:一项关于微博群体凝聚力的研究。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 18;14:1014331. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1014331. eCollection 2023.
3
Online Intergroup Polarization Across Political Fault Lines: An Integrative Review.跨越政治分歧的在线群体间极化:一项综合综述。

本文引用的文献

1
Informal social communication.非正式社交沟通。
Psychol Rev. 1950 Sep;57(5):271-82. doi: 10.1037/h0056932.
2
Collective action and psychological change: the emergence of new social identities.集体行动与心理变化:新社会身份的出现
Br J Soc Psychol. 2000 Dec;39 Pt 4:579-604. doi: 10.1348/014466600164642.
3
Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.自我效能感:迈向行为改变的统一理论
Front Psychol. 2021 Oct 18;12:641215. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641215. eCollection 2021.
Psychol Rev. 1977 Mar;84(2):191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191.