• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

标签作为政治身份的信号:#BlackLivesMatter(黑人的命也是命)和#AllLivesMatter(所有人的命都是命)。

Hashtags as signals of political identity: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.

机构信息

Department of Applied Mathematics, University of California, Merced, CA, United States of America.

Department of Cognitive & Information Sciences, University of California, Merced, CA, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286524. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0286524
PMID:37289780
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10249887/
Abstract

We investigate perceptions of tweets marked with the #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter hashtags, as well as how the presence or absence of those hashtags changed the meaning and subsequent interpretation of tweets in U.S. participants. We found a strong effect of partisanship on perceptions of the tweets, such that participants on the political left were more likely to view #AllLivesMatter tweets as racist and offensive, while participants on the political right were more likely to view #BlackLivesMatter tweets as racist and offensive. Moreover, we found that political identity explained evaluation results far better than other measured demographics. Additionally, to assess the influence of hashtags themselves, we removed them from tweets in which they originally appeared and added them to selected neutral tweets. Our results have implications for our understanding of how social identity, and particularly political identity, shapes how individuals perceive and engage with the world.

摘要

我们研究了带有#BlackLivesMatter 和#AllLivesMatter 标签的推文的认知,以及这些标签的存在或缺失如何改变了美国参与者对推文的意义和后续解释。我们发现党派立场对推文的认知有很大影响,例如,政治左派的参与者更有可能认为#AllLivesMatter 推文是种族主义和冒犯性的,而政治右派的参与者更有可能认为#BlackLivesMatter 推文是种族主义和冒犯性的。此外,我们发现政治身份比其他衡量的人口统计学因素更能解释评估结果。此外,为了评估标签本身的影响,我们从最初出现标签的推文中删除了标签,并将其添加到选定的中性推文中。我们的研究结果对我们理解社会身份,特别是政治身份如何塑造个人对世界的认知和参与具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/214712acd185/pone.0286524.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/19e03fa94055/pone.0286524.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/c22319bc7f18/pone.0286524.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/ff87356623b2/pone.0286524.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/2daadbbb769a/pone.0286524.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/dc871a62ef8f/pone.0286524.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/214712acd185/pone.0286524.g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/19e03fa94055/pone.0286524.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/c22319bc7f18/pone.0286524.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/ff87356623b2/pone.0286524.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/2daadbbb769a/pone.0286524.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/dc871a62ef8f/pone.0286524.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/20f9/10249887/214712acd185/pone.0286524.g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Hashtags as signals of political identity: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.标签作为政治身份的信号:#BlackLivesMatter(黑人的命也是命)和#AllLivesMatter(所有人的命都是命)。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 8;18(6):e0286524. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286524. eCollection 2023.
2
Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.抗议与反抗议之间的分歧言论:#黑人的命也是命#和#所有人的命都是命#。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195644. eCollection 2018.
3
Social media discourse on ageism, sexism, and racism: Analysis of 150 million tweets over 15 years.社交媒体上的年龄歧视、性别歧视和种族主义言论:对 15 年来 1.5 亿条推文的分析。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2024 Oct;72(10):3149-3155. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19047. Epub 2024 Jul 3.
4
Analysis of Twitter Activity and Engagement From Annual Meetings of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the Society of Interventional Radiology.分析血管外科学会和介入放射学会年会的推特活动和参与度。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2021 Oct;76:481-487. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2021.03.011. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
5
More tweets, more votes: social media as a quantitative indicator of political behavior.更多的推文,更多的投票:社交媒体作为政治行为的量化指标。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 27;8(11):e79449. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079449. eCollection 2013.
6
An analysis of emotions and the prominence of positivity in #BlackLivesMatter tweets.分析#BlackLivesMatter 推文中的情绪和积极性的突出表现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Aug 30;119(35):e2205767119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2205767119. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
7
A 10-Year Social Media Analysis Exploring Hospital Online Support of Black Lives Matter and the Black Community.一项长达 10 年的社交媒体分析,旨在探讨医院对“黑人的命也是命”运动和黑人社区的在线支持。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Oct 1;4(10):e2126714. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.26714.
8
#Radiology: A 7-Year Analysis of Radiology-Associated Hashtags.放射学:对与放射学相关主题标签的7年分析。
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2018 Sep;47(5):296-301. doi: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2018.04.005. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
9
Misinformation and the US Ebola communication crisis: analyzing the veracity and content of social media messages related to a fear-inducing infectious disease outbreak.错误信息与美国埃博拉疫情传播危机:分析与引发恐慌的传染病爆发相关的社交媒体信息的真实性和内容
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 7;20(1):550. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08697-3.
10
Development and dissemination of structured hashtags for radiation oncology: Two-Year trends.放射肿瘤学结构化主题标签的开发与传播:两年趋势
Clin Transl Radiat Oncol. 2022 Oct 25;39:100524. doi: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.09.007. eCollection 2023 Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
How opinion variation among in-groups can skew perceptions of ideological polarization.群体内部的意见差异如何扭曲对意识形态两极分化的认知。
PNAS Nexus. 2025 Jun 6;4(7):pgaf184. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgaf184. eCollection 2025 Jul.
2
The evolution of similarity-biased social learning.相似性偏向社会学习的演变
Evol Hum Sci. 2025 Jan 20;7:e4. doi: 10.1017/ehs.2024.46. eCollection 2025.
3
Noise and opinion dynamics: how ambiguity promotes pro-majority consensus in the presence of confirmation bias.噪声与观点动态:在存在确认偏差的情况下,模糊性如何促进多数派共识。

本文引用的文献

1
Strategic identity signaling in heterogeneous networks.异质网络中的战略身份信号传递。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Mar 8;119(10):e2117898119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2117898119. Epub 2022 Mar 3.
2
Covert signaling is an adaptive communication strategy in diverse populations.隐性信号是不同种群中的一种适应性沟通策略。
Psychol Rev. 2022 Jul;129(4):812-829. doi: 10.1037/rev0000344. Epub 2021 Dec 30.
3
Implicit racism, colour blindness, and narrow definitions of discrimination: Why some White people prefer 'All Lives Matter' to 'Black Lives Matter'.
R Soc Open Sci. 2024 Apr 24;11(4):231071. doi: 10.1098/rsos.231071. eCollection 2024 Apr.
4
Social identity bias and communication network clustering interact to shape patterns of opinion dynamics.社会认同偏见和沟通网络聚类相互作用,形成意见动态的模式。
J R Soc Interface. 2023 Dec;20(209):20230372. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2023.0372. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
5
Analyzing the dynamics of social media texts using coherency network analysis: a case study of the tweets with the co-hashtags of #BlackLivesMatter and #StopAsianHate.使用连贯网络分析来分析社交媒体文本的动态:以带有#黑人的命也是命#和#停止亚裔仇恨#共同主题标签的推文为例的研究
Front Res Metr Anal. 2023 Oct 18;8:1239726. doi: 10.3389/frma.2023.1239726. eCollection 2023.
隐性种族主义、色盲症和对歧视的狭隘定义:为什么一些白人更喜欢“所有生命都重要”而不是“黑人的命也是命”。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2021 Oct;60(4):1136-1153. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12458. Epub 2021 May 12.
4
Intraclass correlation - A discussion and demonstration of basic features.组内相关系数 - 基本特征的讨论与演示。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 22;14(7):e0219854. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219854. eCollection 2019.
5
Divergent discourse between protests and counter-protests: #BlackLivesMatter and #AllLivesMatter.抗议与反抗议之间的分歧言论:#黑人的命也是命#和#所有人的命都是命#。
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 18;13(4):e0195644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195644. eCollection 2018.
6
The Evolution of Covert Signaling.隐性信号的演变。
Sci Rep. 2018 Mar 20;8(1):4905. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22926-1.
7
The Partisan Brain: An Identity-Based Model of Political Belief.《党派大脑:基于身份认同的政治信仰模式》
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Mar;22(3):213-224. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.01.004. Epub 2018 Feb 20.
8
Social identity and cooperation in cultural evolution.文化进化中的社会认同与合作。
Behav Processes. 2019 Apr;161:108-116. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.11.015. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
9
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
10
Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes?为什么自由主义者爱喝拿铁咖啡?
AJS. 2015 Mar;120(5):1473-511. doi: 10.1086/681254.