Jones Catherine M, Clavier Carole, Potvin Louise
1LSE Health, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
2Regroupement stratégique Politiques publiques et santé des populations, Réseau de recherche en santé des populations, Montréal, Québec Canada.
Policy Sci. 2020;53(1):161-180. doi: 10.1007/s11077-020-09375-2. Epub 2020 Feb 26.
National policy on global health (NPGH) arenas are multisectoral governing arrangements for cooperation between health, development, and foreign affairs sectors in government policy for global health governance. To explore the relationship between national and global processes for governing global health, this paper asks: in what forms of interaction between NPGH arenas and global health governance are learning and networking processes present? In a multiple case study of Norwegian and Swiss NPGH arenas, we collected data on intersectoral policy processes from semi-structured interviews with 33 informants in 2014-2015. Adapting Real-Dato's framework, we analyzed each case separately, producing monographs for comparing NPGH arenas. Analyzing both NPGH arenas for relational structures linking external resources to internal policy arena processes, we found five zones of interactions - including institutions, transgovernmental clubs, and connective forms. These interactions circulate ideas and soften arenas' boundaries. We argue that NPGH is characteristic of transnational governance of global health.
国家全球健康政策(NPGH)领域是政府全球健康治理政策中卫生、发展和外交事务部门之间合作的多部门治理安排。为了探究国家层面和全球层面治理全球健康的过程之间的关系,本文提出以下问题:在NPGH领域与全球健康治理的何种互动形式中存在学习和网络建设过程?在对挪威和瑞士NPGH领域的多案例研究中,我们在2014 - 2015年通过对33名受访者进行半结构化访谈,收集了跨部门政策过程的数据。采用雷亚尔 - 达托的框架,我们分别分析了每个案例,编写了用于比较NPGH领域的专题论文。通过分析两个NPGH领域中连接外部资源与内部政策领域过程的关系结构,我们发现了五个互动区域——包括机构、跨政府俱乐部和连接形式。这些互动传播了理念并模糊了各领域的界限。我们认为,NPGH是全球健康跨国治理的特征。