Suppr超能文献

硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤的最佳手术入路:椎板切除术还是半椎板切除术?

The Optimal Surgical Approach to Intradural Spinal Tumors: Laminectomy or Hemilaminectomy?

作者信息

Goodarzi Amir, Clouse Jared, Capizzano Tatiana, Kim Kee D, Panchal Ripul

机构信息

Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis Medical Center, Sacramento, USA.

Neurological Surgery, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2020 Feb 23;12(2):e7084. doi: 10.7759/cureus.7084.

Abstract

Objective Traditionally, laminectomy has been the preferred surgical approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors. Recent trends towards minimally invasive techniques have generated interest in hemilaminectomy as an effective alternative surgical approach to resect spinal tumors. However, it remains unclear if the potential benefits of hemilaminectomies, used in other routine spinal procedures, apply to intradural spinal tumors. This report presents a six-year single institutional analysis of open resection of intradural tumors using laminectomies as compared to hemilaminectomies. Methods A single institution, multisurgeon, retrospective review of 52 patients undergoing resection of intradural spinal tumors over a six-year period was performed. Estimated blood loss, operative time, post-operative complications, length of stay, and post-operative clinical spinal instability were analyzed and compared between the two surgical techniques. Results The mean follow-up was 34 and 20 months for the laminectomy and hemilaminectomy groups, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in operative times between the two groups (hemilaminectomy: 250.13±76.44 minutes, laminectomy: 244.49±92.85 minutes; p=0.43). Similarly, there was no difference in overall estimated blood loss (hemilaminectomy: 125±74 cc, laminectomy: 256.05±320.8 cc; p=0.27) or mean hospital length of stay (hemilaminectomy: 4.00±2.12 days, laminectomy: 5.26±3.0 days; p=0.60). No patient in either surgical group had post-operative evidence of clinical spinal instability. Conclusion Hemilaminectomy is a viable approach for the resection of intradural spinal tumors, with similar rates of post-operative complications to laminectomy when using an open surgical approach. The laminectomy allows for bilateral exposure of the entire spinal canal and neural foramina; and continues to be the preferred method for resection of large tumors with complex morphology.

摘要

目的 传统上,椎板切除术一直是切除硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤的首选手术方法。近年来,微创技术的发展引发了人们对半椎板切除术作为切除脊髓肿瘤有效替代手术方法的兴趣。然而,半椎板切除术在其他常规脊柱手术中的潜在益处是否适用于硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤仍不清楚。本报告对使用椎板切除术与半椎板切除术开放切除硬脊膜内肿瘤进行了为期六年的单机构分析。方法 对一家机构的52例在六年期间接受硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤切除术的患者进行了多外科医生的回顾性研究。分析并比较了两种手术技术的估计失血量、手术时间、术后并发症、住院时间和术后临床脊柱稳定性。结果 椎板切除术组和半椎板切除术组的平均随访时间分别为34个月和20个月。两组手术时间无统计学显著差异(半椎板切除术:250.13±76.44分钟,椎板切除术:244.49±92.85分钟;p=0.43)。同样,总体估计失血量(半椎板切除术:125±74 cc,椎板切除术:256.05±320.8 cc;p=0.27)或平均住院时间(半椎板切除术:4.00±2.12天,椎板切除术:5.26±3.0天;p=0.60)也无差异。两个手术组均无患者术后出现临床脊柱不稳定的证据。结论 半椎板切除术是切除硬脊膜内脊髓肿瘤的可行方法,采用开放手术方法时,其术后并发症发生率与椎板切除术相似。椎板切除术可双侧暴露整个椎管和神经孔;仍然是切除形态复杂大肿瘤的首选方法。

相似文献

2
Keyhole approaches to intradural pathologies.针对硬膜内病变的锁孔入路
Neurosurg Focus. 2017 Aug;43(2):E5. doi: 10.3171/2017.5.FOCUS17198.
4
Minimally invasive resection of intradural-extramedullary spinal neoplasms.硬脊膜内髓外脊髓肿瘤的微创切除
Neurosurgery. 2006 Feb;58(1 Suppl):ONS52-8; discussion ONS52-8. doi: 10.1227/01.neu.0000192661.08192.1c.
9
Minimally invasive approach for the resection of spinal neoplasm.脊柱肿瘤的微创切除术。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jul 1;36(15):E1018-26. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820019f9.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

7
The technological development of minimally invasive spine surgery.微创脊柱手术的技术发展
Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:293582. doi: 10.1155/2014/293582. Epub 2014 May 21.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验