Hagey Laboratory for Pediatric and Regenerative Medicine, Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Department of Hand, Plastic, and Reconstructive Surgery, BG Trauma Center Ludwigshafen, Ruprecht-Karls-University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Int Wound J. 2020 Aug;17(4):925-936. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13349. Epub 2020 Mar 30.
Cryopreserved human skin allografts (CHSAs) are used for the coverage of major burns when donor sites for autografts are insufficiently available and have clinically shown beneficial effects on chronic non-healing wounds. However, the biologic mechanisms behind the regenerative properties of CHSA remain elusive. Furthermore, the impact of cryopreservation on the immunogenicity of CHSA has not been thoroughly investigated and raised concerns with regard to their clinical application. To investigate the importance and fate of living cells, we compared cryopreserved CHSA with human acellular dermal matrix (ADM) grafts in which living cells had been removed by chemical processing. Both grafts were subcutaneously implanted into C57BL/6 mice and explanted after 1, 3, 7, and 28 days (n = 5 per group). A sham surgery where no graft was implanted served as a control. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and flow cytometry were used to characterise the ultrastructure and cells within CHSA before implantation. Immunofluorescent staining of tissue sections was used to determine the immune reaction against the implanted grafts, the rate of apoptotic cells, and vascularisation as well as collagen content of the overlaying murine dermis. Digital quantification of collagen fibre alignment on tissue sections was used to quantify the degree of fibrosis within the murine dermis. A substantial population of live human cells with intact organelles was identified in CHSA prior to implantation. Subcutaneous pockets with implanted xenografts or ADMs healed without clinically apparent rejection and with a similar cellular immune response. CHSA implantation largely preserved the cellularity of the overlying murine dermis, whereas ADM was associated with a significantly higher rate of cellular apoptosis, identified by cleaved caspase-3 staining, and a stronger dendritic cell infiltration of the murine dermis. CHSA was found to induce a local angiogenic response, leading to significantly more vascularisation of the murine dermis compared with ADM and sham surgery on day 7. By day 28, aggregate collagen-1 content within the murine dermis was greater following CHSA implantation compared with ADM. Collagen fibre alignment of the murine dermis, correlating with the degree of fibrosis, was significantly greater in the ADM group, whereas CHSA maintained the characteristic basket weave pattern of the native murine dermis. Our data indicate that CHSAs promote angiogenesis and collagen-1 production without eliciting a significant fibrotic response in a xenograft model. These findings may provide insight into the beneficial effects clinically observed after treatment of chronic wounds and burns with CHSA.
冷冻保存的同种异体人皮移植物(CHSA)用于覆盖供体部位自体移植物不足的大面积烧伤,并且已在慢性难愈性伤口的临床治疗中显示出有益效果。然而,CHSA 再生特性背后的生物学机制仍难以捉摸。此外,冷冻保存对 CHSA 免疫原性的影响尚未得到彻底研究,这引起了人们对其临床应用的担忧。为了研究活细胞的重要性和命运,我们将冷冻保存的 CHSA 与人去细胞真皮基质(ADM)移植物进行了比较,后者通过化学处理去除了活细胞。这两种移植物均被皮下植入 C57BL/6 小鼠体内,并在植入后 1、3、7 和 28 天(每组 5 只)取出。没有植入移植物的假手术作为对照。透射电子显微镜(TEM)和流式细胞术用于在植入前对 CHSA 的超微结构和细胞进行特征分析。组织切片免疫荧光染色用于确定对植入移植物的免疫反应、凋亡细胞的比率以及覆盖的小鼠真皮的血管生成和胶原蛋白含量。组织切片上胶原纤维排列的数字量化用于量化小鼠真皮内纤维化的程度。在植入前的 CHSA 中鉴定出大量具有完整细胞器的活人类细胞。植入异种移植物或 ADM 的皮下袋愈合,无明显临床排斥反应,并伴有类似的细胞免疫反应。CHSA 植入在很大程度上保留了覆盖的小鼠真皮的细胞性,而 ADM 与细胞凋亡的发生率显著更高相关,这通过 cleaved caspase-3 染色确定,并且 ADM 中树突状细胞对小鼠真皮的浸润也更强。CHSA 被发现可诱导局部血管生成反应,与 ADM 和假手术相比,在第 7 天可显著增加小鼠真皮的血管化。到第 28 天,与 ADM 相比,植入 CHSA 后小鼠真皮内胶原-1 含量增加。与纤维化程度相关的小鼠真皮胶原纤维排列在 ADM 组中显著增加,而 CHSA 保持了天然小鼠真皮的典型篮状图案。我们的数据表明,CHSA 在异种移植模型中不会引起明显的纤维化反应,而是促进血管生成和胶原-1 产生。这些发现可能为临床观察到的 CHSA 治疗慢性伤口和烧伤的有益效果提供了一些启示。