Suppr超能文献

随机、前瞻性、盲法入组、头对头静脉性腿部溃疡愈合试验:比较活性生物工程皮肤移植替代物(Apligraf)与活性冷冻保存人同种异体皮肤(TheraSkin)

Randomized, Prospective, Blinded-Enrollment, Head-To-Head Venous Leg Ulcer Healing Trial Comparing Living, Bioengineered Skin Graft Substitute (Apligraf) with Living, Cryopreserved, Human Skin Allograft (TheraSkin).

作者信息

Towler Michael A, Rush Elaine W, Richardson Melissa K, Williams Calvin L

机构信息

Bon Secours St Francis Wound Healing Center, Suite 100, 131 Commonwealth Drive, Greenville, SC 29615, USA.

Bon Secours St Francis Wound Healing Center, Suite 100, 131 Commonwealth Drive, Greenville, SC 29615, USA.

出版信息

Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 2018 Jul;35(3):357-365. doi: 10.1016/j.cpm.2018.02.006. Epub 2018 Apr 14.

Abstract

Chronic venous leg ulcers are responsible for significant morbidity and health care costs worldwide. This pilot study evaluated the effectiveness 2 biologically active grafts, TheraSkin and Apligraf, in conjunction with compression therapy. The study, not industry-sponsored, was designed and conducted as a prospective, head-to-head, single-site, randomized clinical trial to assess differences in healing rates, adverse outcomes, and treatment costs. The healing rates were different but not statistically significant, there were no adverse outcomes, and TheraSkin averaged $2495.33 and Apligraf averaged $4316.67 per subject. This suggests that TheraSkin may provide equivalent or superior outcomes to Apligraf while reducing costs.

摘要

下肢慢性静脉溃疡在全球范围内导致了严重的发病率和医疗保健费用。这项初步研究评估了两种生物活性移植物TheraSkin和Apligraf联合压迫疗法的有效性。该研究并非由行业赞助,其设计和实施为一项前瞻性、直接比较、单中心、随机临床试验,以评估愈合率、不良结局和治疗成本的差异。愈合率有所不同,但无统计学意义,未出现不良结局,每位受试者使用TheraSkin的平均费用为2495.33美元,使用Apligraf的平均费用为4316.67美元。这表明TheraSkin在降低成本的同时,可能提供与Apligraf相当或更好的疗效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验