Suppr超能文献

肺腺癌倍增时间:与主要组织学亚型和预后的相关性。

Volume Doubling Times of Lung Adenocarcinomas: Correlation with Predominant Histologic Subtypes and Prognosis.

机构信息

From the Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology (S.P., S.M.L., K.H.D., J.B.S.); Department of Medical Statistics (S.K.), Department of Convergence Medicine (J.G.L.), and Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery (S.C.), University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, 88 Olympic-ro 43 Gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.

出版信息

Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):703-712. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020191835. Epub 2020 Mar 31.

Abstract

Background The volume doubling time (VDT) is a key parameter in the differentiation of aggressive tumors from slow-growing tumors. How different histologic subtypes of primary lung adenocarcinomas vary in their VDT and the prognostic value of this measurement is unknown. Purpose To investigate differences in VDT between the predominant histologic subtypes of primary lung adenocarcinomas and to assess the correlation between VDT and prognosis. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients who underwent at least two serial CT examinations before undergoing operation between July 2010 and December 2018. Three-dimensional tumor segmentation was performed on two CT images and VDTs were calculated. VDTs were compared between predominant histologic subtypes and lesion types by using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Disease-free survival (DFS) was obtained in patients undergoing surgical procedures before July 2017. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of DFS. Results Among 268 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 8 [standard deviation]; 143 men), there were 30 lepidic, 87 acinar, 109 papillary, and 42 solid or micropapillary predominant subtypes. The median VDT was 529 days (interquartile range, 278-872 days) for lung adenocarcinomas. VDTs differed across subtypes ( < .001) and were shortest in solid or micropapillary subtypes (229 days; interquartile range, 77-530 days). Solid lesions (VDT, 248 days) had shorter VDTs than subsolid lesions (part-solid lesions, 665 days; nonsolid lesions, 648 days) ( < .001). In the 148 patients (mean age, 64 years ± 8; 89 men) included in the survival analysis, 35 patients had disease recurrence and 17 patients died. VDT (<400 days) was an independent risk factor for poor DFS (hazard ratio, 2.6; = .01) and higher TNM stage. Adding VDT to TNM stage improved model performance (C-index, 0.69 for TNM stage vs 0.77 for combined VDT class and TNM stage; = .002). Conclusion Volume doubling times varied significantly according to the predominant histologic subtypes of lung adenocarcinoma and had additional prognostic value for disease-free survival. © RSNA, 2020 See also the editorial by Ko in this issue.

摘要

背景 倍增时间(VDT)是区分侵袭性肿瘤和生长缓慢肿瘤的关键参数。不同组织学亚型的原发性肺腺癌在 VDT 方面存在差异,以及该测量值的预后价值尚不清楚。目的 研究原发性肺腺癌主要组织学亚型之间 VDT 的差异,并评估 VDT 与预后之间的相关性。材料与方法 该回顾性研究纳入了 2010 年 7 月至 2018 年 12 月期间至少接受两次连续 CT 检查后行手术的患者。对两次 CT 图像进行三维肿瘤分割,并计算 VDT。采用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验比较不同主要组织学亚型和病变类型之间的 VDT。在 2017 年 7 月前接受手术的患者中获得无病生存(DFS)。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险回归分析确定 DFS 的预测因素。结果 在 268 例患者(平均年龄 64 岁±8[标准差];143 例男性)中,有 30 例为贴壁型、87 例为腺泡型、109 例为乳头型和 42 例为实体或微乳头型为主亚型。肺腺癌的中位 VDT 为 529 天(四分位距,278-872 天)。不同亚型之间的 VDT 存在差异(<.001),实体或微乳头型亚型的 VDT 最短(229 天;四分位距,77-530 天)。实性病变(VDT,248 天)的 VDT 短于亚实性病变(部分实性病变,665 天;非实性病变,648 天)(<.001)。在 148 例(平均年龄 64 岁±8;89 例男性)生存分析患者中,35 例患者出现疾病复发,17 例患者死亡。VDT(<400 天)是 DFS 不良的独立危险因素(危险比,2.6; =.01)和较高的 TNM 分期。将 VDT 加入 TNM 分期可改善模型性能(TNM 分期的 C 指数为 0.69,联合 VDT 分级和 TNM 分期的 C 指数为 0.77; =.002)。结论 根据肺腺癌的主要组织学亚型,VDT 差异显著,对无病生存具有额外的预后价值。RSNA,2020 年 也可参见本期 Ko 的社论。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验