Department of Medical Ultrasonography, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Department of Medical Ultrasonography, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.
Clin Breast Cancer. 2020 Aug;20(4):317-325. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2020.02.009. Epub 2020 Feb 27.
We analyzed the clinical and ultrasound characteristics associated with false-negative mammography results in women with dense breasts.
The present study included 191 women (mean age, 54.47 ± 11.61 years; range, 31-75 years) who had presented from July 2015 to June 2018 with pathologically confirmed breast cancer. The mammography, conventional ultrasound, and elastography imaging results of these patients were reviewed. Breast density and screening cancer probability from mammography and conventional ultrasound imaging were scored using the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors independently associated with the false-negative results on breast mammographic screening.
Of 191 confirmed breast cancer cases, 55 (28.8%) were assigned to category ≤ 3, and 136 (71.2%) were assigned to category ≥ 4a according to the mammography findings. All the breasts were graded mammographically as dense. A rougher margin (odds ratio [OR], 8.123; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.731-38.127) was the strongest independent factor associated with negative results, followed by a lower stiffness ratio (OR, 7.773; 95% CI, 2.574-23.473), negative axillary lymph node status (OR, 5.066; 95% CI, 1.028-24.955), and softer lesions (OR, 1.037; 95% CI, 1.001-1.075).
Women with dense breasts, a lower lesion/glandular tissue stiffness ratio, and softer cancer can easily lead to a misdiagnosis using mammography. By giving sufficient attention to the margin, earlier stage cancer with negative lymph node status are more likely to benefit from supplemental ultrasound imaging.
我们分析了致密型乳腺女性中假阴性乳腺 X 线摄影结果的临床和超声特征。
本研究纳入了 191 名(平均年龄 54.47±11.61 岁,范围 31-75 岁)女性患者,这些患者均于 2015 年 7 月至 2018 年 6 月因经病理证实的乳腺癌就诊。回顾这些患者的乳腺 X 线摄影、常规超声和弹性成像结果。使用乳腺影像报告和数据系统(Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System)对乳腺 X 线摄影和常规超声成像的乳腺密度和筛查癌症概率进行评分。采用多变量逻辑回归分析确定与乳腺 X 线摄影筛查假阴性结果独立相关的因素。
在 191 例经病理证实的乳腺癌病例中,根据乳腺 X 线摄影结果,55 例(28.8%)被归类为≤3 类,136 例(71.2%)被归类为≥4a 类。所有乳房均被乳腺 X 线摄影评为致密型。更粗糙的边缘(比值比 [OR],8.123;95%置信区间 [CI],1.731-38.127)是与阴性结果最相关的最强独立因素,其次是较低的硬度比(OR,7.773;95%CI,2.574-23.473)、阴性腋窝淋巴结状态(OR,5.066;95%CI,1.028-24.955)和较软的病变(OR,1.037;95%CI,1.001-1.075)。
致密型乳腺、病变/腺体组织硬度比降低和更软的癌症患者,使用乳腺 X 线摄影很容易误诊。通过充分关注边缘,具有阴性淋巴结状态的早期癌症更有可能受益于补充超声成像。