Added Value of Different Types of Elastography in Evaluating Ultrasonography Detected Breast Lesions: A Compared Study With Mammography.

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of ultrasonography (US) and mammography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions after adding different types of elastography to US.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This institutional review board-approved study included 316 breast lesions in 289 women between July 2016 and July 2018. All these lesions were evaluated with conventional US, elastography, and mammography before biopsy or surgery. Elastography, including elasticity imaging (EI), virtual touch tissue imaging (VTI), and virtual touch imaging quantification (VTIQ), were used to downgrade US Breast Imaging-Reporting and Data System category 4A lesions. Diagnostic performances were calculated for mammography, US elastography, and the combination of US and elastography.

RESULTS

The sensitivity of US (100%) was significantly higher than that of mammography (84.6%; P < .001), but the specificity of US (14.5%) was significantly lower than that of mammography (59.1%; P < .001). After adding EI, VTI, and VTIQ to US, the specificity was significantly increased from 14.5% to 69.4%, 72.6%, and 78.0%, respectively (P < .001), and were significantly higher than that of mammography (P = .043, P = .006, and P < .001, respectively). The sensitivity of US + EI (96.2%) and US + VTI (96.2%) was lower than that of US alone, although not significantly (100%; P = .063 and P = .063, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The addition of different types of elastography to US improved the diagnostic performance in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions when compared with mammography.