Stacchi Claudio, Spinato Sergio, Lombardi Teresa, Bernardello Fabio, Bertoldi Carlo, Zaffe Davide, Nevins Myron
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2020 May/Jun;40(3):e95-e102. doi: 10.11607/prd.4498.
Insufficient crestal bone is a common feature encountered in the edentulous posterior maxilla due to atrophy of the alveolar ridge and maxillary sinus pneumatization. Numerous surgical techniques, grafting materials, and timing protocols have been proposed for implant-supported rehabilitation of posterior maxillae with limited bone height. In the majority of potential implant sites, residual bone height is less than 8 mm and the clinician has to select either a lateral or transcrestal sinus-elevation technique or placing short implants as the correct surgical option. Nevertheless, guidelines for selecting the best option remains mostly based on the personal experience and skills of the surgeon. The role of sinus anatomy in healing and graft remodeling after sinus floor augmentation is crucial. In addition to the evaluation of residual bone height, the clinician should consider that histologic and clinical outcomes are also influenced by the buccal-palatal bone wall distance. Therefore, three main clinical scenarios may be identified and treated with either a lateral or transcrestal sinus-elevation technique or short implants. This article introduces a new decision tree for a minimally invasive approach based on current evidence to help the clinician safely and predictably manage implant-supported treatment of the atrophic posterior maxilla.
由于牙槽嵴萎缩和上颌窦气化,上颌后牙区无牙颌中嵴顶骨量不足是常见现象。对于骨高度有限的上颌后牙区种植支持修复,已提出了多种手术技术、植骨材料和时机方案。在大多数潜在种植位点,剩余骨高度小于8mm,临床医生必须选择侧方或经嵴顶入路的上颌窦提升技术,或者植入短种植体作为正确的手术选择。然而,选择最佳方案的指导原则大多仍基于外科医生的个人经验和技术。上颌窦解剖结构在窦底提升术后愈合和植骨重塑中的作用至关重要。除了评估剩余骨高度外,临床医生还应考虑颊腭骨壁距离也会影响组织学和临床结果。因此,可以确定三种主要临床情况,并采用侧方或经嵴顶入路的上颌窦提升技术或短种植体进行治疗。本文基于当前证据引入一种用于微创方法的新决策树,以帮助临床医生安全、可预测地管理萎缩性上颌后牙区的种植支持治疗。